Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/437,260

400G SILICON PHOTONIC INTEGRATED OPTICAL MODULE WITH PHOTOELECTRIC INTEGRATED SUBSTRATE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 09, 2024
Priority
Feb 21, 2023 — CN 202310149731.1
Examiner
STAHL, MICHAEL J
Art Unit
2874
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Shunyun Technology (Zhongshan) Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1130 granted / 1256 resolved
+22.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1284
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
38.9%
-1.1% vs TC avg
§102
41.3%
+1.3% vs TC avg
§112
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1256 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objection Claim 8 is objected to because lines 4-6 recite that the laser assembly has a "photo detector active area". It is believed that this may be a typo since it is not clear why a laser assembly (i.e., a light emitting device) would have a "photo detector" active area. Accordingly, it appears that in line 5, "photo detector" should be deleted and "a" should be replaced with "an". Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 1 is indefinite because there is insufficient antecedent basis for "the other side of the recessed groove" as recited in lines 7 and 9. The earlier text of claim 1 does not establish that the recessed groove has only two sides. Claim 1 could be clarified by replacing "the other side" with "another side" in each of lines 7 and 9. Claims 2-10 are indefinite by dependence from claim 1. Claim 6 is also indefinite because line 5 recites "the locating groove" but lines 2-3 recite a plurality of locating grooves. It appears that "the locating groove" should be replaced with "each locating groove" in line 5. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 would be allowable if the indefiniteness issues mentioned above are resolved (and for claim 8, if it is amended to overcome the informality objection). US 2023/0194808 A1 is regarded as the closest prior art of record. '808 discloses a module including a PCB substrate 201, a fiber array 210, a detector assembly 107-1, a laser assembly 204-1, and a silicon substrate 203 including optical waveguides 105 / 106, the silicon substrate being attached in a recessed groove 215 in the PCB substrate. However, '808 does not disclose or suggest at least a surface circuit board mounted at an upper side of the silicon substrate; a fiber port of the fiber array being provided with a light reflecting surface; a first microlens located directly below the light reflecting surface; or a second microlens located directly below the detector assembly or the laser assembly. There is no apparent motivation or suggestion to substantially redesign the '808 device in order to add these extra elements in the recited positions. Conclusion The additional references listed on the attached 892 form disclose other examples of optical modules associated with a PCB. Contact Information Examiner: 571-272-2360 Examiner's direct supervisor: 571-272-2397 Official correspondence by fax: 571-273-8300 Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Should you have questions about Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /Michael Stahl/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2874
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 09, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638642
INSTALLING AN OPTICAL FIBER
3y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12619124
DEVICE FOR SWITCHING OPTICAL SIGNAL
2y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12619028
MULTIFUNCTIONAL SELF-SUSTAINED HOSTING APPARATUS AND RELATED BIDIRECTIONAL OPTICAL SUB ASSEMBLY BASED ON PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12613379
SPLICE-ON OPTICAL CONNECTORS FOR MULTICORE FIBERS
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12613389
LOCKING RING FOR A CABLE CLOSURE
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+7.5%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1256 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month