Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/437,948

Stress-Responsive Composites

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 09, 2024
Priority
Apr 20, 2018 — provisional 62/660,796 +2 more
Examiner
ILLING, CAITLIN NORINE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Arizona Board of Regents on Behalf of Arizona State University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
23 granted / 47 resolved
-11.1% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+37.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
91
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
54.3%
+14.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 47 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Makyla et al (Fluorescent Protein Senses and Reports Mechanical Damage in Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites, May 2013, Advanced Materials, Vol. 25, p.2633-2752) Makyla teaches a method for making a fiber-reinforced polymer composite, comprising a step of contacting a fiber with a first solution of 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane, rinsing the fiber with a second solution of toluene and drying it, contacting the fiber with a third solution of eYFP, rinsing the fiber with a fourth solution of a phosphate buffer, and drying the fiber (Supporting Information, p.2, Glass surface modification), wherein the eYFP layer is UV-sensitive/fluorescent (Supporting Information, p.9, Figure S3). The functionalized fiber is then combined with an epoxy polymer matrix material, and the composite material is cured (Supporting Information, p.3, Preparation of glass-epoxy composites), followed by irradiation with a light source (Supporting Information, p.4, Confocal laser scanning microscopy, excitation light and emission light). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Makyla is the closest prior art, which teaches the basic claimed material as set forth above. However, Makyla does not teach the usage of cinnamoyl chloride. Although cinnamoyl moieties are known to have mechanophoric properties when incorporated into polymers (see Nofen et al, below), prior art alone or in combination does not teach the functionalization of fibers with cinnamoyl chloride. One of ordinary skill in the art would not have found it obvious to substitute the eYFP mechanophore taught by Makyla with cinnamoyl chloride. Additional Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Nofen et al (Stress-sensing thermoset polymer networks via grafted cinnamoyl/cyclobutane mechanophore units in epoxy, 04 Nov 2016, Polymer Chemistry, Vol. 7, p.7429-7259) teaches epoxy resins functionalized with mechanophoric cinnamoyl units. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CAITLIN N ILLING whose telephone number is (571)270-1940. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Eashoo can be reached at (571)272-1197. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.N.I./Examiner, Art Unit 1767 /MARK EASHOO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1767
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 09, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703783
MATERIAL FOR A POLYSTYRENE-BASED FOOD PACKAGING AND PREPARATION METHOD
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12668671
FINELY DIVIDED AQUEOUS PARTICLE-STABILIZED PICKERING EMULSION AND PARTICLES PRODUCED THEREFROM
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12636234
POLYURETHANE-BASED COMPOSITE MATERIAL PRODUCTION METHOD, POLYURETHANE-BASED COMPOSITE MATERIAL, AND MATERIAL FOR DENTAL CUTTING
3y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12589056
CURABLE COMPOSITION FOR DENTAL IMPRESSION
3y 10m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583947
METHOD FOR PRODUCING FLUOROPOLYMER
5y 6m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+37.7%)
3y 7m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 47 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month