Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/438,350

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING SERVICES FOR USER EQUIPMENT BASED ON ENERGY CONSTRAINTS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 09, 2024
Examiner
APPIAH, CHARLES NANA
Art Unit
2641
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
39%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
55%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 39% of cases
39%
Career Allow Rate
20 granted / 51 resolved
-22.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
69
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.4%
+12.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 51 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to the application filed on 02/09/2024. Claims 1-16 are pending with claims 1, 5, 9 and 13 being independent. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Cheng et al. (US 2024/0031896 A1). Regarding claim 1, Cheng discloses a method performed by a base station in a wireless communication system, the method comprising: identifying whether a cell is a network energy savings (NES) cell ([0056] NESAI from network apparatus 520, wherein the NESAI may comprise a cell barred field or a cell reservation filed for NWES configured to differentiate between non-NES UEs and NES-capable UEs); and in case that the cell is the NES cell and the cell is allowed an access of a terminal ([0057] In some implementations, the cell barred field or the cell reservation field may indicate whether the NES-capable UEs are allowed camping on the NES cell), transmitting, to the terminal, a message comprising information indicating that the cell is allowed the access of the terminal ([0063] In some implementations, processor 522 may determine a NESAI, wherein the NESAI comprises a cell barred field or a cell reservation field for NWES configured to differentiate between non-NES UEs and NES-capable UEs. Processor 522 may transmit, via transceiver 526, the NESAI to communication apparatus 510), wherein the terminal is capable of supporting energy savings ([0062] In some implementations, processor 512 may receive, via transceiver 516, a UE capability enquiry from the network node. Processor 512 may transmit, via transceiver 516, a UE capability information to the network node to indicate whether the cell reselection for the NES cell is supported). Regarding claim 2, Cheng discloses wherein the message comprises a system information block 1 to determine the cell barring status ([0032] In some implementations, in the MIB, the UE may receive cellBarredforNWES (i.e., the cell barred field or the cell reservation field) with information element (IE) types of barred or not barred. The cellBarredforNWES with the value “barred” may mean that a cell is barred, and the UE is not allowed to camp on the barred cell and [0058] receiving, via transceiver 516, the NESAI from the network node through a MIB, a SIB, a PEI, a PDCCH in a PO, or a PDSCH in the PO). Regarding claim 3, Cheng further discloses wherein the information is used for accessing the cell or camping restriction [0032] In some implementations, in the MIB, the UE may receive cellBarredforNWES (i.e., the cell barred field or the cell reservation field) with information element (IE) types of barred or not barred. The cellBarredforNWES with the value “barred” may mean that a cell is barred, and the UE is not allowed to camp on the barred cell). Regarding claim 4, Cheng further discloses in case that the cell is barred to the terminal, transmitting, to the terminal, the message without the information (Fig. 1, CELLBARREDFOR NWES THROUGH MIB SIB, ([0032] In some implementations, in the MIB, the UE may receive cellBarredforNWES (i.e., the cell barred field or the cell reservation field) with information element (IE) types of barred or not barred. The cellBarredforNWES with the value “barred” may mean that a cell is barred, and the UE is not allowed to camp on the barred cell). Regarding claim 5, Cheng discloses a method performed by a terminal in a wireless communication system, the method comprising: in case that a cell is network energy savings (NES) cell and the cell is allowed an access of the terminal (([0056] NESAI from network apparatus 520, wherein the NESAI may comprise a cell barred field or a cell reservation filed for NWES configured to differentiate between non-NES UEs and NES-capable UEs)), receiving, from a bases station, a message comprising information on indicating the cell is allowed the access of the terminal ([0056] In some implementations, processor 512 may receive, via transceiver 516, a NESAI from network apparatus 520, wherein the NESAI may comprise a cell barred field or a cell reservation field for NWES configured to differentiate between non-NES UEs and NES-capable UEs. Processor 512 may perform a cell reselection for a NES cell based on the NESAI), and identifying whether the terminal is allowed to access the cell , wherein the termina is capable of supporting energy savings ([0062] In some implementations, processor 512 may receive, via transceiver 516, a UE capability enquiry from the network node. Processor 512 may transmit, via transceiver 516, a UE capability information to the network node to indicate whether the cell reselection for the NES cell is supported). Regarding claim 6, Cheng further discloses wherein the message comprises a system information block 1 to determine the cell barring status ([0032] In some implementations, in the MIB, the UE may receive cellBarredforNWES (i.e., the cell barred field or the cell reservation field) with information element (IE) types of barred or not barred. The cellBarredforNWES with the value “barred” may mean that a cell is barred, and the UE is not allowed to camp on the barred cell and [0058] receiving, via transceiver 516, the NESAI from the network node through a MIB, a SIB, a PEI, a PDCCH in a PO, or a PDSCH in the PO). Regarding claim 7, Cheng further discloses wherein the information is used for accessing the cell or camping restriction ([0032] In some implementations, in the MIB, the UE may receive cellBarredforNWES (i.e., the cell barred field or the cell reservation field) with information element (IE) types of barred or not barred. The cellBarredforNWES with the value “barred” may mean that a cell is barred, and the UE is not allowed to camp on the barred cell). Regarding claim 8, Cheng further discloses comprising: in case that the cell is barred to the terminal, receiving, from the base station, the message without the information (Fig. 1, CELLBARREDFOR NWES THROUGH MIB SIB, ([0032] In some implementations, in the MIB, the UE may receive cellBarredforNWES (i.e., the cell barred field or the cell reservation field) with information element (IE) types of barred or not barred. The cellBarredforNWES with the value “barred” may mean that a cell is barred, and the UE is not allowed to camp on the barred cell). Regarding claim 9, Cheng discloses a base station (Fig. 5, Network Apparatus, 520) in a wireless communication system, the base station comprising a transceiver (526); and at least one processor (522) coupled to the transceiver and configured to: identify whether a cell is a network energy savings (NES) cell ([0056] NESAI from network apparatus 520, wherein the NESAI may comprise a cell barred field or a cell reservation filed for NWES configured to differentiate between non-NES UEs and NES-capable UEs); and in case that the cell is the NES cell and the cell is allowed an access of a terminal ([0057] In some implementations, the cell barred field or the cell reservation field may indicate whether the NES-capable UEs are allowed camping on the NES cell), transmit, to the terminal, a message comprising information indicating that the cell is allowed the access of the terminal ([0063] In some implementations, processor 522 may determine a NESAI, wherein the NESAI comprises a cell barred field or a cell reservation field for NWES configured to differentiate between non-NES UEs and NES-capable UEs. Processor 522 may transmit, via transceiver 526, the NESAI to communication apparatus 510), wherein the terminal is capable of supporting energy savings ([0062] In some implementations, processor 512 may receive, via transceiver 516, a UE capability enquiry from the network node. Processor 512 may transmit, via transceiver 516, a UE capability information to the network node to indicate whether the cell reselection for the NES cell is supported). Regarding claim 11, Cheng further discloses wherein the message comprises a system information block 1 to determine the cell barring status ([0032] In some implementations, in the MIB, the UE may receive cellBarredforNWES (i.e., the cell barred field or the cell reservation field) with information element (IE) types of barred or not barred. The cellBarredforNWES with the value “barred” may mean that a cell is barred, and the UE is not allowed to camp on the barred cell and [0058] receiving, via transceiver 516, the NESAI from the network node through a MIB, a SIB, a PEI, a PDCCH in a PO, or a PDSCH in the PO). Regarding claim 12, Cheng further discloses wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: in case that the cell is barred to the terminal, transmit, to the terminal, the message without the information (Fig. 1, CELLBARREDFOR NWES THROUGH MIB SIB, ([0032] In some implementations, in the MIB, the UE may receive cellBarredforNWES (i.e., the cell barred field or the cell reservation field) with information element (IE) types of barred or not barred. The cellBarredforNWES with the value “barred” may mean that a cell is barred, and the UE is not allowed to camp on the barred cell). Regarding claim 13, Cheng discloses a terminal (Fig. 5, Network Apparatus, 510) in a wireless communication system, the base station comprising a transceiver (516); and at least one processor (512) coupled to the transceiver and configured to: identify whether a cell is a network energy savings (NES) cell ([0056] NESAI from network apparatus 520, wherein the NESAI may comprise a cell barred field or a cell reservation filed for NWES configured to differentiate between non-NES UEs and NES-capable UEs); and in case that the cell is the NES cell and the cell is allowed an access of a terminal ([0057] In some implementations, the cell barred field or the cell reservation field may indicate whether the NES-capable UEs are allowed camping on the NES cell), transmit, to the terminal, a message comprising information indicating that the cell is allowed the access of the terminal ([0063] In some implementations, processor 522 may determine a NESAI, wherein the NESAI comprises a cell barred field or a cell reservation field for NWES configured to differentiate between non-NES UEs and NES-capable UEs. Processor 522 may transmit, via transceiver 526, the NESAI to communication apparatus 510), wherein the terminal is capable of supporting energy savings ([0062] In some implementations, processor 512 may receive, via transceiver 516, a UE capability enquiry from the network node. Processor 512 may transmit, via transceiver 516, a UE capability information to the network node to indicate whether the cell reselection for the NES cell is supported). Regarding claim 14, Cheng further discloses wherein the message comprises a system information block 1 to determine the cell barring status ([0032] In some implementations, in the MIB, the UE may receive cellBarredforNWES (i.e., the cell barred field or the cell reservation field) with information element (IE) types of barred or not barred. The cellBarredforNWES with the value “barred” may mean that a cell is barred, and the UE is not allowed to camp on the barred cell and [0058] receiving, via transceiver 516, the NESAI from the network node through a MIB, a SIB, a PEI, a PDCCH in a PO, or a PDSCH in the PO). Regarding claim 15, Cheng further discloses wherein the information is used for accessing the cell or camping restriction [0032] In some implementations, in the MIB, the UE may receive cellBarredforNWES (i.e., the cell barred field or the cell reservation field) with information element (IE) types of barred or not barred. The cellBarredforNWES with the value “barred” may mean that a cell is barred, and the UE is not allowed to camp on the barred cell). Regarding claim 16, Cheng further discloses wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: in case that the cell is barred to the terminal, receive from the base station, the message without the information (Fig. 1, CELLBARREDFOR NWES THROUGH MIB SIB, ([0032] In some implementations, in the MIB, the UE may receive cellBarredforNWES (i.e., the cell barred field or the cell reservation field) with information element (IE) types of barred or not barred. The cellBarredforNWES with the value “barred” may mean that a cell is barred, and the UE is not allowed to camp on the barred cell). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Choe (US 2025/0159603 A1) discloses a method for performing a network energy saving (NES) operation by determining whether or not to perform the NES operation. Yue et al. (US 2026/0019922 A1) discloses a method and apparatus for access restriction in an energy saving network. Chen (WO 2024/213015 A1) discloses a wireless communication method for a network energy saving (NES) system. Diogo (GB 2637824 A) discloses a method for a user equipment to manage cell barring in a telecommunications network during cell selection and/or reselection. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES N APPIAH whose telephone number is (571)272-7904. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00-5:30 M-TH. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARLES N APPIAH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 09, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603954
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTHENTICATION OF TELEPHONE CALLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604157
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING DETECTING AN EXTERNAL OBJECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584951
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR AUTOMATIC SIGNAL DETECTION BASED ON POWER DISTRIBUTION BY FREQUENCY OVER TIME WITHIN A SPECTRUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581003
HANDHELD ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12579237
INTELLIGENT GALLERY MANAGEMENT FOR BIOMETRICS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
39%
Grant Probability
55%
With Interview (+15.9%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 51 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month