Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/439,108

DISHWASHING APPLIANCE WITH COLOR MATCHING SOUND INSULATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 12, 2024
Examiner
SHAHINIAN, LEVON J
Art Unit
1711
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Haier US Appliance Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
699 granted / 819 resolved
+20.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -7% lift
Without
With
+-6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
838
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
69.7%
+29.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 819 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The communication dated 2/9/2026 has been entered and fully considered. Claim 10 was amended. Claims 1-18 are currently pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions The restriction requirement between Groups I and II, as set forth in the Office action mailed on 12/10/2025, has been reconsidered and is hereby withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-6, 10-12, and 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Rockwell et al. U.S. Publication 2012/0298154 (henceforth referred to as Rockwell). As for claim 1, Rockwell teaches a dishwashing appliance (Fig. 17: part 1700), comprising: a tub (Fig. 18: part 1702) defining a wash chamber (Fig. 18: part 1718) therein for receipt of articles for washing; a sump (Fig. 18: part 1815) positioned at a bottom of the wash chamber for receiving fluid from the wash chamber; a pump (Fig. 18: part 1704) in fluid communication with the wash chamber and the sump; and an acoustic barrier (Fig. 18: parts 1708 and 1716) positioned outside the tub, wherein a portion (Fig. 18: part 1708) of the acoustic barrier is visible from outside of the dishwashing appliance, and wherein the acoustic barrier is color matched with an adjacent external portion of the dishwashing appliance (Fig. 17). As for claim 2, Rockwell further teaches that the adjacent external portion of the dishwashing appliance comprises a front surface of a door of the dishwashing appliance (Fig. 17). As for claim 3, Rockwell further teaches that the adjacent external portion of the dishwashing appliance comprises a toe kick (paragraph [0073]). As for claim 5, Rockwell further teaches that the acoustic barrier comprises a sound blanket (Fig. 19: part 20) extending along at least one side of the tub (paragraph [0004]; Fig. 18). As for claim 6, Rockwell further teaches that the acoustic barrier comprises sound insulation formed of a fiber material (paragraph [0003]). As for claim 10, Rockwell teaches a dishwashing appliance (Fig. 17: part 1700) comprising: a tub (Fig. 18: part 1702) defining a wash chamber (Fig. 18: part 1718) therein for receipt of articles for washing; a sump (Fig. 18: part 1815) positioned at a bottom of the wash chamber for receiving fluid from the wash chamber; a pump (Fig. 18: part 1704) in fluid communication with the wash chamber and the sump; a cosmetic panel (Fig. 17; the outer surface of access door 1720) defining at least one external surface of the dishwashing appliance, wherein the at least one external surface comprises a color (Fig. 17); and an acoustic barrier (Fig. 18: parts 1708 and 1716) positioned within the dishwashing appliance, wherein a portion (Fig. 18: part 1708) of the acoustic barrier is visible from outside of the dishwashing appliance, and wherein the portion of the acoustic barrier comprises the color (Fig. 17). As for claim 11, Rockwell further teaches that the cosmetic panel is a door panel and the at least one external surface of the dishwashing appliance comprises a front surface of a door of the dishwashing appliance (Fig. 17). As for claim 12, Rockwell further teaches that the cosmetic panel comprises a toe kick (paragraph [0073]). As for claim 14, Rockwell further teaches that the acoustic barrier comprises a sound blanket (Fig. 19: part 20) extending along at least one side of the tub (paragraph [0004]; Fig. 18). As for claim 15, Rockwell further teaches that the acoustic barrier comprises sound insulation formed of a fiber material (paragraph [0003]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 7-9 and 16-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rockwell et al. U.S. Publication 2012/0298154 (henceforth referred to as Rockwell). Rockwell teaches the features as per above. Examiner takes official notice that using paint, dyes, or other common colorants to make an appliance aesthetically pleasing is old and well known in the art. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. As for claims 8 and 17, Rockwell further teaches that the acoustic barrier comprises a first material configured for acoustically insulating the dishwashing appliance (Fig. 19: part 22) and a layer of a second material on a portion of the exterior of the acoustic barrier (Fig. 19: part 20). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4 and 13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Rockwell et al. U.S. Publication 2012/0298154, the closest prior art, differs from the instant claims in failing to teach cutout defined in the toe kick, wherein the portion of the acoustic barrier is visible from outside of the dishwashing appliance through the cutout defined in the toe kick. Furthermore, it would not have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the dishwashing appliance taught by Rockwell as claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEVON J SHAHINIAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1384. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:30am-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Barr can be reached at (571)272-1414. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LEVON J SHAHINIAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 12, 2024
Application Filed
May 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637795
CONDITIONING SYSTEM FOR A COMBINATION LAUNDRY APPLIANCE
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637796
LAUNDRY SYSTEM AND METHOD TO REDUCE TEXTILE MICROFIBER RELEASE
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635845
DISHWASHING APPLIANCE AND ELECTRIC MOTOR FOR A FLUID PUMP THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12642034
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636685
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (-6.9%)
2y 6m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 819 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month