Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/439,163

AUTONOMOUS SWIMMING POOL CLEANER

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Feb 12, 2024
Priority
Feb 13, 2023 — provisional 63/445,197
Examiner
FULL, SIDNEY DANIELLE
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Zodiac Pool Care Europe
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
107 granted / 153 resolved
At TC average
Strong +68% interview lift
Without
With
+67.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
202
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.0%
+10.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 153 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office action is in response to amendments filed on 06/11/2026. Claims 1, 6-9, and 16-22 are pending. The previously filed claim interpretations are withdrawn, as necessitated by the cancellation of claims 4-5 and 12-13. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 6-9, 16-20, and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by LaCalle Bayo (US 2017/0114560). Regarding claim 1, LaCalle Bayo (US 2017/0114560) discloses an autonomous pool cleaner (includes items 100 and 200; figs. 1-3) for a swimming pool or spa (pp. [0001] and [0115]), wherein the autonomous pool cleaner comprises: a body (outer structure items 100, 200; fig. 1) comprising a front end (designated in annotated fig. 3 below), a back end (designated in annotated fig. 3 below) opposite the front end, a top side (designated in annotated fig. 3 below) extending between the front end and the back end (fig. 1), and a bottom side (not explicitly shown; on bottom side of body relative to top side; partially designated in annotated fig. 3 below) opposite the top side; at least one brushing system (items 51, 52, 53, 54; figs. 1 and 11), wherein the at least one brushing system is proximate to the front end of the body (brushing system is proximate to front end of body; figs. 1 and 3) and is configured to perform a cleaning operation (the brushing system is capable of performing a cleaning operation, i.e. dragging dirt towards center of device; pp. [0126] and [0131]; figs. 1 and 5); and one or more propellers (items 204; fig. 2), wherein the one or more propellers are controllable such that (i) the autonomous pool cleaner comprises six degrees of freedom (pp. [0145]; propellers 204 are capable of moving the pool cleaner in all degrees, i.e. forward, reverse, rotation, gripping, withdrawing, and lateral displacement) and (ii) the autonomous pool cleaner is configured to clean at least a vertical wall of the swimming pool or spa while the top side of the body is facing upwards (pool cleaner is capable of cleaning vertical, sloped wall a portion of the brushing system, i.e. frontmost brushes 51, in contact with the fall and top side facing upwards). PNG media_image1.png 462 737 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Fig. 3. Regarding claim 6, LaCalle Bayo discloses the autonomous pool cleaner as claimed in claim 1, wherein the one or more propellers are on an exterior of a housing (propellers 204 are on an exterior of a housing portion, i.e. housing 200, of pool cleaner) of the autonomous pool cleaner (fig. 3). Regarding claim 7, LaCalle Bayo discloses the autonomous pool cleaner as claimed in claim 1, where the one or more propellers comprises two propellers (propellers 204 include two propellers 204; fig. 3) on opposite sides of the autonomous pool cleaner (designated in annotated fig. 2 below; propellers 204 are on opposite left and right sides of pool cleaner). Regarding claim 8, LaCalle Bayo discloses the autonomous pool cleaner as claimed in claim 1, wherein the autonomous pool cleaner further comprises an inlet for receiving water (via inlet on turbines 4; pp. [0137]; fig. 1) and an outlet (not explicitly shown; pp. [0137], defined as outlet to drive water in opposite direction from inlet to the support surface of rollers) for discharging water from the autonomous pool cleaner, wherein the outlet comprises means for minimizing a flow reaction force from a pump of the autonomous pool cleaner (pp. [0137-0138]; pump 8 is connected to suction mouth 30 and flow of water from inlet to outlet drive the adherence to the surface). Regarding claim 9, LaCalle Bayo discloses the autonomous pool cleaner as claimed in claim 1, wherein the autonomous pool cleaner further comprises an inlet (defined as inlet through entire turbine 4; pp. [0137]; fig. 1), the inlet comprising a first channel (defined as uppermost channel in which water first enters turbine, i.e. vertical direction in view of fig. 1 of body) for receiving water from a first direction (defined as vertical direction in view of fig. 1) and a second channel (pp. [0137]; defined as opposite end of inlet in which water passes normal to surface to be cleaned, i.e. horizontal direction in view of fig. 1) for receiving water from a second direction (defined as horizontal direction in view of fig. 1). Regarding claim 16, LaCalle Bayo discloses an autonomous pool cleaner (includes items 100 and 200; figs. 1-3) for a swimming pool or spa (pp. [0001] and [0115]), wherein the autonomous pool cleaner comprises: a body (outer structure items 100, 200; fig. 1); a non-variable buoyancy (pp. [0137-0138]; includes turbines 4 and suction mouth 30; figs. 1 and 3); and one or more propellers (items 204; fig. 2), wherein the one or more propellers are configured to propel the autonomous pool cleaner within the swimming pool or spa with six degrees of freedom (pp. [0145]; propellers 204 are capable of moving the pool cleaner in all degrees, i.e. forward, reverse, rotation, gripping, withdrawing, and lateral displacement). Regarding claim 17, LaCalle Bayo discloses the autonomous pool cleaner as claimed in claim 16, wherein the one or more propellers are on an exterior of a housing (propellers 204 are on an exterior of a housing portion, i.e. housing 200, of pool cleaner) of the autonomous pool cleaner (fig. 3). Regarding claim 18, LaCalle Bayo discloses the autonomous pool cleaner as claimed in claim 16, where the one or more propellers comprises two propellers (propellers 204 include two propellers 204; fig. 3) on opposite sides of the autonomous pool cleaner (designated in annotated fig. 2 below; propellers 204 are on opposite left and right sides of pool cleaner). Regarding claim 19, LaCalle Bayo discloses the autonomous pool cleaner as claimed in claim 16, wherein the autonomous pool cleaner further comprises an inlet for receiving water (via inlet on turbines 4; pp. [0137]; fig. 1) and an outlet (not explicitly shown; pp. [0137], defined as outlet to drive water in opposite direction from inlet to the support surface of rollers) for discharging water from the autonomous pool cleaner, wherein the outlet comprises means for minimizing a flow reaction force from a pump of the autonomous pool cleaner (pp. [0137-0138]; pump 8 is connected to suction mouth 30 and flow of water from inlet to outlet drive the adherence to the surface). Regarding claim 20, LaCalle Bayo discloses the autonomous pool cleaner as claimed in claim 16, wherein the autonomous pool cleaner further comprises an inlet (defined as inlet through entire turbine 4; pp. [0137]; fig. 1), the inlet comprising a first channel (defined as uppermost channel in which water first enters turbine, i.e. vertical direction in view of fig. 1 of body) for receiving water from a first direction (defined as vertical direction in view of fig. 1) and a second channel (pp. [0137]; defined as opposite end of inlet in which water passes normal to surface to be cleaned, i.e. horizontal direction in view of fig. 1) for receiving water from a second direction (defined as horizontal direction in view of fig. 1). Regarding claim 22, LaCalle Bayo discloses the autonomous pool cleaner as claimed in claim 16, wherein the non-variable buoyancy is a negative buoyancy (pp. [0137-0138]; buoyancy system via turbines 4 and suction mouth 30 adhere the robot to the surface of the pool, i.e. negative buoyancy). Claims 16 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by van der Meijden (US Patent No. 10,968,651). Regarding claim 16, van der Meijden (US Patent No. 10,968,651) discloses an autonomous pool cleaner (item 10; fig. 1; abstract) for a swimming pool or spa (abstract), wherein the autonomous pool cleaner comprises: a body (item 14; fig. 1; col. 6, ll. 10-12); a non-variable buoyancy (col. 2, ll. 23-24 and col. 10, ll. 11-12); and one or more propellers (item 58; col. 10, ll. 22-23 and col. 6, ll. 60 through col. 7, ll. 2; fig. 7) wherein the one or more propellers are configured to propel the autonomous pool cleaner within the swimming pool or spa with six degrees of freedom (propeller 58 is capable of providing pool cleaner 10 with down force, torque, i.e. rotating the cleaner as it descends, and lateral movement; col. 3, ll. 6-20). Regarding claim 21, van der Meijden discloses the autonomous pool cleaner as claimed in claim 16, wherein the non-variable buoyancy is a positive buoyancy (non-variable buoyancy is positive, i.e. floats to the surface when motor and propeller are not on; col. 2, ll. 23-24 and col. 10, ll. 11-12). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to independent claims 1 and 16 have been considered but are moot because they are addressing newly amended claim limitations, as compared to the rejection of record. Upon further consideration and as necessitated by the amendments, a new grounds of rejection is made in view of LaCalle Bayo (US 2017/0114560), for independent claims 1 and 16, and in view of van der Meijden (US Patent No. 10,968,651), for independent claim 16 and dependent claim 21. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SIDNEY D FULL whose telephone number is (571)272-6996. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7:00a.m.-2:30p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Keller can be reached at (571)272-8548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SIDNEY D FULL/Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 12, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 11, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12733779
CLEANER
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733781
CLEANING DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734621
LOCKING SCREW MACHINE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721486
VACUUM TOOLS
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721489
VACUUM CLEANER
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+67.6%)
2y 10m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 153 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month