Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/439,377

RANDOM ACCESS PROCEDURES WITH A VIRTUAL CELL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 12, 2024
Examiner
CHOWDHURY, HARUN UR R
Art Unit
2473
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
439 granted / 581 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
636
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
§102
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 581 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 2. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 3. Claims 1, 5-6, 8, 10, 13, 17-18, 20, 22, 25, and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ohara et al (US 20200281016, hereinafter referred to as Ohara) in view of Manolakos et al (US 20230031065, hereinafter referred to as Manolakos). Re claim 1, Ohara teaches a user equipment (UE) (UE 200, Fig. 1, Fig. 10-11), comprising: (i) one or more memories (memory, 1002) storing processor-executable code (software/program) (Fig. 11, Par 0058, Par 0060-0063); and (ii) one or more processors (Processor, 1001) coupled with the one or more memories (memory, 1002) and individually or collectively operable to execute the code (Fig. 11, Par 0058, Par 0060-0063) to cause the UE to: (iii) receive a control message (receiving one or more RACH bands and RACH resources/occasions within each RACH band/BWP, Fig. 3-4, Par 0031-0033, Par 0037-0041, receiving an association between RACH bands and SSBs including RACH resources/occasions within each RACH band/BWP, Fig. 8, Par 0045, Par 0049-0050, Par 0052) that comprises an index of a sub-band (indication of each RACH band and RACH resources within each band, initial active BWP, SSB index associated with a RACH BWP/band, Fig. 8) of a plurality of sub-bands (plurality of RACH bands/BWPs) of a (iv) transmit a random access message within a random access occasion of the quantity of random access occasions (transmitting message 1/random access preamble using a RACH resource from the plurality of RACH resources included within a RACH band/BWP, Par 0033, Par 0048, Par 0056) indicated by the control message (indication of the one or more RACH bands and RACH resources/occasions within each RACH band/BWP, Fig. 3-4, Par 0031-0033, Par 0037-0041, an association between RACH bands and SSBs including RACH resources/occasions within each RACH band/BWP, Fig. 8, Par 0045, Par 0049-0050, Par 0052); and (v) receive a random access response message (random access response (RAR)/message 2) that is associated with the index of the sub-band (RACH band/BWP from which RACH resource is selected), the random access occasion (RACH resource used to transmit message 1/random access preamble), or both after transmitting the random access message (reception of RAR/Message 2 is associated with the transmission of message 1/random access preamble using a RACH resource included within a RACH band/BWP) (Par 0048). Ohara discloses that the base station allocating random access resources/occasion represents a cell, but Ohara does not explicitly disclose that the base station allocating random access resources/occasions represents a virtual cell. Manolakos teaches that a base station allocating random access resources/occasions (Fig. 11A-D, Fig. 13 A-C, Par 0139, Par 0147) represents a virtual cell (Par 0040---" A “cell” is a logical communication entity used for communication with a base station (e.g., over some frequency resource, referred to as a carrier frequency, component carrier, carrier, band, or the like), and may be associated with an identifier (e.g., a physical cell identifier (PCI), a virtual cell identifier (VCI), a cell global identifier (CGI)) for distinguishing cells operating via the same or a different carrier frequency.”) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ohara by including the feature that a base station allocating random access resources/occasions represents a virtual cell, as taught by Manolakos for the purpose of efficiently using RACH resources for both positioning and initial access, as taught by Manolakos (Par 0155-0156). Claim 25 recites a method performing the functions recited in claim 1 and thereby, is rejected for the reasons discussed above with respect to claim 1. Re claims 5, 17, Ohara teaches to receive a second control message associated with the random access response message based at least in part on transmitting the random access message (control message scheduling message 2 in response to the transmission of message 1), wherein the random access response message is associated with the index of the sub-band, the random access occasion, or both based at least in part on receiving the second control message (random access response (RAR) message is associated with the random access preamble/message 1) (Par 0048). Re claims 6, 18, Ohara teaches that the second control message comprises one or more fields that indicate the index of the sub-band, the random access occasion, or both (Information element indicating RACH band used for transmitting message 1) (Par 0048). Re claims 8, 20, Ohara teaches to receive, via the random access response message, an indication of the index of the sub-band, an indication of the random access occasion, or both (Par 0048). Re claims 10, 22, Ohara teaches to receive the random access response message in accordance with the index of the sub-band, the random access occasion, or both based at least in part on first information included in a second control message associated with the random access response message (CRC of DCI scrambled with RA-RNTI) and second information included in the random access response message (Information element indicating RACH band used for transmitting message 1) (Par 0048). Re claim 13, Ohara teaches a network entity (base station 100) (Fig. 1-2), comprising: (i) one or more memories (1002, Fig. 11) storing processor-executable code (software/program codes) (Par 0058-0060, Par 0062-0063); and (ii) one or more processors (1001, Fig. 11) coupled with the one or more memories (1002) and individually or collectively operable to execute the code (Fig. 11, Par 0058-0062) to cause the network entity to: (iii) output a control message (receiving one or more RACH bands and RACH resources/occasions within each RACH band/BWP, Fig. 3-4, Par 0031-0033, Par 0037-0041, receiving an association between RACH bands and SSBs including RACH resources/occasions within each RACH band/BWP, Fig. 8, Par 0045, Par 0049-0050, Par 0052) that comprises an index of a sub-band (indication of each RACH band and RACH resources within each band, initial active BWP, SSB index associated with a RACH BWP/band, Fig. 8) of a plurality of sub-bands (plurality of RACH bands/BWPs) of a Ohara does not disclose that the cell is a virtual cell); (iv) obtain a random access message within a random access occasion of the quantity of random access occasions (transmitting message 1/random access preamble using a RACH resource from the plurality of RACH resources included within a RACH band/BWP, Par 0033, Par 0048, Par 0056) indicated by the control message (indication of the one or more RACH bands and RACH resources/occasions within each RACH band/BWP, Fig. 3-4, Par 0031-0033, Par 0037-0041, an association between RACH bands and SSBs including RACH resources/occasions within each RACH band/BWP, Fig. 8, Par 0045, Par 0049-0050, Par 0052); and (v) output, to a user equipment (UE) (UE 200, Fig. 1, Fig. 10), a random access response message (random access response (RAR)/message 2) that is associated with the index of the sub-band (RACH band/BWP from which RACH resource is selected), the random access occasion (RACH resource used to transmit message 1/random access preamble), or both after obtaining the random access message (reception of RAR/Message 2 is associated with the transmission of message 1/random access preamble using a RACH resource included within a RACH band/BWP) (Par 0048). Ohara discloses that the base station allocating random access resources/occasion represents a cell, but Ohara does not explicitly disclose that the base station allocating random access resources/occasions represents a virtual cell. Manolakos teaches that a base station allocating random access resources/occasions (Fig. 11A-D, Fig. 13 A-C, Par 0139, Par 0147) represents a virtual cell (Par 0040---" A “cell” is a logical communication entity used for communication with a base station (e.g., over some frequency resource, referred to as a carrier frequency, component carrier, carrier, band, or the like), and may be associated with an identifier (e.g., a physical cell identifier (PCI), a virtual cell identifier (VCI), a cell global identifier (CGI)) for distinguishing cells operating via the same or a different carrier frequency.”) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ohara by including the feature that a base station allocating random access resources/occasions represents a virtual cell, as taught by Manolakos for the purpose of efficiently using RACH resources for both positioning and initial access, as taught by Manolakos (Par 0155-0156). Claim 28 recites a method performing the functions recited in claim 13 and thereby, is rejected for the reasons discussed above with respect to claim 13. 4. Claims 2, 14, 26, and 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ohara and Manolakos as applied to claim 1 above and further in view of Hou et al (US 20240276502, hereinafter referred to as Hou). Re claims 2, 14, 26, 29, Ohara does not explicitly disclose to transmit the random access message in accordance with a first index, wherein the first index is based at least in part on combining the quantity of random access occasions with one or more second quantities of random access occasions associated with one or more second sub-bands. Hou teaches to transmit the random access message in accordance with a first index (determining a random access channel occasion (RO) based on a selected SSB), wherein the first index (selected RO index/number) is based at least in part on combining the quantity of random access occasions (ROs in the first BWP) with one or more second quantities of random access occasions (ROs in the second BWP) associated with one or more second sub-bands (ROs are jointly numbered in a plurality of BWPs/sub-bands) (Fig. 13-15, Par 0034, Par 0036-0044, Par 0170-0172, Par 0174, Par 0178-0183). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ohara by including the feature to transmit the random access message in accordance with a first index, wherein the first index is based at least in part on combining the quantity of random access occasions with one or more second quantities of random access occasions associated with one or more second sub-bands, as taught by Hou for the purpose of improving “transmission quality performance when a plurality of terminal devices multiplex a transmission resource”, as taught by Hou (Par 0006). 5. Claims 7, 9, 19, and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ohara and Manolakos as applied to claim 5 above and further in view of Tang et al (US 20230371084, hereinafter referred to as Tang). Re claim 7, Ohara does not explicitly disclose to decode the second control message in accordance with the index of the sub-band, the random access occasion, or both based at least in part on one or more cyclic redundancy check bits of the second control message, a reference signal scrambling identifier of the second control message, a bit interleaving pattern of the second control message, or any combination thereof, wherein receiving the random access response message is based at least in part on decoding the second control message. Tang teaches to decode the second control message (DCI scheduling RAR) in accordance with the index of the sub-band, the random access occasion, or both (RA-RNTI) based at least in part on one or more cyclic redundancy check bits of the second control message (CRC bits scrambled with RA-RNTI), a reference signal scrambling identifier of the second control message, a bit interleaving pattern of the second control message, or any combination thereof, wherein receiving the random access response message is based at least in part on decoding the second control message (RAR received by decoding DCI scheduling RAR) (Fig. 10, Par 0119-0125, Par 0181-0184). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ohara by including the feature to decode the second control message in accordance with the index of the sub-band, the random access occasion, or both based at least in part on one or more cyclic redundancy check bits of the second control message, a reference signal scrambling identifier of the second control message, a bit interleaving pattern of the second control message, or any combination thereof, wherein receiving the random access response message is based at least in part on decoding the second control message, as taught by Tang for the purpose of providing flexible initial access processes to improve spectrum utilization, improve load balance for PRACH transmissions, reduce PRACH collision and/or improve uplink coverage, as taught by Tang (Par 0007). Re claims 9, 21, Ohara does not explicitly disclose to receive the indication of the index of the sub-band, the indication of the random access occasion of the random access response message, or both via a medium access control header of the random access response message, a medium access control payload, one or more padding bits of the random access response message, a reference signal scrambling identifier of the random access response message, or a combination thereof. Tang teaches to receive the indication of the index of the sub-band, the indication of the random access occasion of the random access response message, or both (RA-RNTI) via a medium access control header of the random access response message, a medium access control payload, one or more padding bits of the random access response message, a reference signal scrambling identifier of the random access response message, or a combination thereof (CRC scrambled with RA-RNTI) (Fig. 10, Par 0119-0125, Par 0181-0184). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ohara by including the feature to receive the indication of the index of the sub-band, the indication of the random access occasion of the random access response message, or both (RA-RNTI) via a medium access control header of the random access response message, a medium access control payload, one or more padding bits of the random access response message, a reference signal scrambling identifier of the random access response message, or a combination thereof, as taught by Tang for the purpose of providing flexible initial access processes to improve spectrum utilization, improve load balance for PRACH transmissions, reduce PRACH collision and/or improve uplink coverage, as taught by Tang (Par 0007). Re claim 19, Ohara does not explicitly disclose to encode the second control message in accordance with the index of the sub-band, the random access occasion, or both based at least in part on one or more cyclic redundancy check bits of the second control message, a reference signal scrambling identifier of the second control message, a bit interleaving pattern of the second control message, or any combination thereof. Tang teaches to encode the second control message (DCI scheduling RAR) in accordance with the index of the sub-band, the random access occasion, or both (RA-RNTI) based at least in part on one or more cyclic redundancy check bits of the second control message (CRC bits scrambled with RA-RNTI), a reference signal scrambling identifier of the second control message, a bit interleaving pattern of the second control message, or any combination thereof (Fig. 10, Par 0119-0125, Par 0181-0184). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ohara by including the feature to encode the second control message in accordance with the index of the sub-band, the random access occasion, or both based at least in part on one or more cyclic redundancy check bits of the second control message, a reference signal scrambling identifier of the second control message, a bit interleaving pattern of the second control message, or any combination thereof., as taught by Tang for the purpose of providing flexible initial access processes to improve spectrum utilization, improve load balance for PRACH transmissions, reduce PRACH collision and/or improve uplink coverage, as taught by Tang (Par 0007). 6. Claims 11 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ohara and Manolakos as applied to claim 1 above and further in view of Tang (US 20210144770, hereinafter referred to as Tang ‘770). Re claims 11, 23, Ohara does not explicitly disclose that the quantity of random access occasions is based at least in part on a type of random access procedure. Tang ‘770 teaches that the quantity of random access occasions is based at least in part on a type of random access procedure (first type of random access procedure, second type of random access procedure) (Fig. 1-2, Fig. 4, Par 0050-0051, Par 0066-0067). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ohara by including the feature that the quantity of random access occasions is based at least in part on a type of random access procedure, as taught by Tang ‘770 for the purpose of providing “a random access method suitable for low delay in the NR system”, as taught by Tang ‘770 (Par 0003). 7. Claims 12 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ohara and Manolakos as applied to claim 1 above and further in view of Popovic et al (US 20210337604, hereinafter referred to as Popovic). Re claims 12, 24, Ohara does not explicitly disclose that at least a first sub-band of the plurality of sub-bands and a second sub-band of the plurality of sub-bands are non-contiguous in a frequency domain. Popovic teaches that at least a first sub-band of the plurality of sub-bands and a second sub-band of the plurality of sub-bands are non-contiguous in a frequency domain (disjoint subbands) (Par 0020-0021, Par 0084-0086). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ohara by including the feature that at least a first sub-band of the plurality of sub-bands and a second sub-band of the plurality of sub-bands are non-contiguous in a frequency domain, as taught by Popovic for the purpose of employing a random access procedure to “improve performance, such as reduced mis-detection probability and false detection probability”, as taught by Popovic (Par 0002, Par 0011). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-4, 15-16, 27 and 30 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARUN UR R CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is (571)270-3895. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kwang B Yao can be reached at 5712723182. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARUN CHOWDHURY/Examiner, Art Unit 2473
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 12, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598570
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICE FOR CORRECTING OFFSET BETWEEN BASE STATION AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587900
ERROR HANDLING IN DUAL ACTIVE LINK HANDOVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581531
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR LISTEN-BEFORE-TALK IN A FREQUENCY BAND
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12556316
CONFIGURABLE MINI-SLOT RETRANSMISSIONS IN SIDELINK COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12549428
DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+26.6%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 581 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month