Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/439,781

ROTOR FOR AN ELECTRIC MACHINE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 13, 2024
Examiner
MOK, ALEX W
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Dr. Ing. H.C. F. Porsche Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
827 granted / 1114 resolved
+6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1158
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
63.6%
+23.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1114 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Engelhardt et al. (Foreign Patent Document No.: DE 102019127583 A1) in view of Matsumoto (US Patent No.: 9030062). For claim 1, Engelhardt et al. disclose the claimed invention comprising: at least one inner sheet package (reference numeral 13, figure 1) arranged on a rotor shaft (reference numeral 22, figure 2) defining a rotor longitudinal axis (see figures 1, 2); buried magnets (reference numeral 4) arranged radially around the at least one inner sheet package (reference numeral 13, see figures 1, 2), which are arranged in a radial direction between the inner sheet package (reference numeral 13) and correspondingly arranged outer sheet packages (reference numeral 23, see figures 1, 2) and are fixed by a casting compound (i.e. Engelhardt et al. disclose the encapsulation/casting mold/potting material, see translation of Engelhardt et al., Description, paragraph [0008]); a plurality of surface magnets (reference numeral 14) arranged on the outer sheet packages (see figures 1, 2), wherein each surface magnet (reference numeral 14) forms a rotor pole in conjunction with a respective outer sheet package (reference numeral 23) of the outer sheet packages on which it is arranged and at least one of the buried magnets (i.e. each rotor pole formed by the combination of the surface magnet 14, outer sheet package 23, and buried magnet 4, see figures 1, 2). Engelhardt et al. however do not specifically disclose at least one cooling channel extending along the rotor longitudinal axis being arranged in at least one of the inner or outer sheet packages and being sealed by a casting compound in a medium-tight manner against the at least one of the inner or outer sheet packages in which it is located. Having a cooling channel formed in the rotor package and sealed by casting compound is a known skill as exhibited by Matsumoto which discloses a cooling channel (reference numeral 28, figures 1, 3) formed in the rotor (reference numeral 21) and sealed by a resin component (reference numeral 51, see figures 1, 3), which would teach the sealing by the casting compound in a medium-tight manner against the at least one of the inner or outer sheet packages in which it is located. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the cooling channel and the sealing by casting compound as disclosed by Matsumoto for the inner or outer sheet packages of Engelhardt et al. for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the cooling within the device. Claim(s) 2-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Matsubara et al. (US Patent No.: 8080908). For claim 2, Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto disclose the claimed invention except for the cooling channel being configured to direct a cooling liquid from a first balancing disk to a second balancing disk of the rotor, wherein the first and second balancing disks are arranged on two opposite end faces of the rotor. Matsubara et al. disclose the cooling channel (reference numeral 26, figure 5) being configured to direct a cooling liquid from a first balancing disk (reference numeral 14a) to a second balancing disk (reference numeral 14b) of the rotor (see figure 5), wherein the first and second balancing disks (reference numerals 14a, 14b) are arranged on two opposite end faces of the rotor (see figure 5). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the first and second balancing disk as disclosed by Matsubara et al. for the rotor and cooling channel of Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the flow of cooling means within the device. For claim 3, Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto and Matsubara et al. disclose the claimed invention except for the first balancing disk comprising a cooling channel inlet, which is configured to receive a cooling liquid and to direct it into the at least one cooling channel, and the second balancing disk comprising a cooling channel outlet, which is configured to collect the cooling liquid from the cooling channel to discharge it from the rotor. Matsubara et al. disclose the first balancing disk (reference numeral 14a) comprising a cooling channel inlet (reference numerals 25, 31 in first balancing disk 14a, figure 5), which is configured to receive a cooling liquid and to direct it into the at least one cooling channel (reference numeral 26, figure 5), and the second balancing disk (reference numeral 14b) comprising a cooling channel outlet (reference numeral 31 in second balancing disk 14b, see figure 5), which is configured to collect the cooling liquid from the cooling channel (reference numeral 26) to discharge it from the rotor (see figure 5). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the inlet in the first balancing disk and the outlet in the second balancing disk as disclosed by Matsubara et al. for the first and second balancing disks of Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto and Matsubara et al. for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the flow of cooling means within the device. For claim 4, Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto and Matsubara et al. disclose the claimed invention except for the rotor comprising at least two cooling channels and the first balancing disk comprising a cooling channel inlet, configured to receive and direct a cooling liquid into at least one cooling channel, and a cooling channel outlet, configured to collect the cooling liquid from one of the at least two cooling channels to discharge it from the rotor, and wherein the second balancing disk comprises a cooling liquid guide, which is configured to transfer the cooling liquid from one of the at least two cooling channels to another of the at least two cooling channels of the rotor. Matsubara et al. disclose the rotor comprising at least two cooling channels (reference numerals 23a, 23b, 27, see figure 12) and the first balancing disk (reference numeral 14a) comprising a cooling channel inlet (reference numerals 25, 31 in first balancing disk 14a, see figure 12), configured to receive and direct a cooling liquid into at least one cooling channel (reference numerals 23a, 23b, 27, see figure 12), and a cooling channel outlet (reference numeral 35, see figure 12), configured to collect the cooling liquid from one of the at least two cooling channels (reference numerals 23a, 23b, 27) to discharge it from the rotor (see figure 12), and wherein the second balancing disk (reference numeral 14b) comprises a cooling liquid guide (reference numeral 31 in second balancing disk 14b, figure 12), which is configured to transfer the cooling liquid from one of the at least two cooling channels (reference numerals 23a, 23b) to another of the at least two cooling channels of the rotor (see cooling channel 27, figure 12). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the cooling channel inlet and outlet for the first balancing disk and to have the cooling liquid guide for the second balancing disk as disclosed by Matsubara et al. for the first and second balancing disks of Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto and Matsubara et al. for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the flow of cooling means within the device. Claim(s) 5 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Malmberg (US Patent Application Pub. No.: US 2007/0228858 A1). For claim 5, Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto disclose the claimed invention except for the at least one cooling channel being arranged in at least one of the outer sheet packages. Forming channels in the outer sheet package would merely involve having holes in the outer sheet package which is a known skill in the art as exhibited by Malmberg (reference numeral 24, see figure 1), and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the hole in the outer sheet package as disclosed by Malmberg for the outer sheet packages of Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the cooling function in the device. For claim 6, Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto disclose the claimed invention except for the at least one cooling channel being arranged in the at least one inner sheet package. Forming channels in the inner sheet package would merely involve having holes in the inner sheet package which is a known skill in the art as exhibited by Malmberg (reference numeral 10, see figure 1), and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the hole in the inner sheet package as disclosed by Malmberg for the inner sheet packages of Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the cooling function in the device. Claim(s) 7 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Nishikuma et al. (Japanese Patent Document No.: JP 2012139074 A). For claim 7, Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto disclose the claimed invention except for the at least one cooling channel being arranged in the casting compound for fixing the buried magnets. Nishikuma et al. disclose the at least one cooling channel (reference numerals 63, 83, figures 8, 10) being arranged in the casting compound (reference numeral 62, 82, figures 8, 10) for fixing the buried magnets (reference numeral 41, see figures 8, 10). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the cooling channel in the casting compound as disclosed by Nishikuma et al. for the buried magnets of Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the cooling function in the device. For claim 8, Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto disclose the claimed invention except for the casting compound in the at least one cooling channel having a thickness of between 0.2 mm and 0.5 mm. Having a particular thickness for the casting compound would merely involve changing the size/shape of the compound which is a known skill as exhibited by Nishikuma et al. (see figures 8, 10, casting compound 62, 82), and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to change the size/shape of the casting compound as disclosed by Nishikuma et al. for having a particular thickness within the cooling channel of Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the cooling function in the device. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Dums et al. (US Patent Application Pub. No.: US 2020/0328641 A1). For claim 9, Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto disclose the claimed invention except for the at least one cooling channel in at least one sheet package of the inner and outer sheet packages having a symmetrical trapezoidal cross-section, wherein one side of the trapezoid is smaller than the other. Having a particular shape for the cooling channel is a known skill in the art as exhibited by Dums et al. (reference numeral 7, see figures 2, 3), and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a particular shape as disclosed by Dums et al. so that the cooling channel would have a shape such as a symmetrical trapezoidal cross-section for Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the cooling function in the device. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Tardy et al. (US Patent Application Pub. No.: US 2022/0399770 A1). For claim 10, Engelhardt et al. disclose providing at least one inner sheet package (reference numeral 13) and providing outer sheet packages (reference numeral 23, see figures 1, 2); arranging the at least one inner sheet package (reference numeral 13) and outer sheet packages (reference numeral 23) together with buried magnets (reference numeral 4) and surface magnets (reference numeral 14) on a rotor shaft (reference numeral 22, figure 2) such that the buried magnets (reference numeral 4) are positioned between the at least one inner sheet package (reference numeral 13) and the outer sheet packages (reference numeral 23) and the surface magnets (reference numeral 14) are arranged on the outer sheet packages (reference numeral 23, see figures 1, 2); and fixing the buried magnets (reference numeral 4) with a casting compound (i.e. Engelhardt et al. disclose the encapsulation/casting mold/potting material, see translation of Engelhardt et al., Description, paragraph [0008]). Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto however do not specifically disclose cutting out at least one cooling channel in the at least one inner sheet package and/or the outer sheet packages, such that the cooling channel, when assembled, directs a cooling medium from an end face of the rotor to an opposite end face of the rotor; and lining the at least one cooling channel with the casting compound. Forming the channel by cutting is a known skill as exhibited by Tardy et al. (see paragraph [0051]), and Matsumoto already disclose the cooling channel having the lining with casting compound (reference numeral 51, see figures 1, 3), which when applied to the rotor of Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto would teach cutting out at least one cooling channel in the at least one inner sheet package and/or the outer sheet packages, such that the cooling channel, when assembled, directs a cooling medium from an end face of the rotor to an opposite end face of the rotor; and lining the at least one cooling channel with the casting compound. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the cutting of the channel as disclosed by Tardy et al. and the lining with casting compound as disclosed by Matsumoto for the cooling channel of Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the cooling within the device. Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto and Tardy et al. as applied to claim 10 above, and further in view of Nishikuma et al. (Japanese Patent Document No.: JP 2012139074 A). For claim 11, Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto and Tardy et al. disclose the claimed invention except for forming a further cooling channel in the casting compound for fixing the buried magnets. Nishikuma et al. disclose a cooling channel (reference numerals 63, 83, see figures 8, 10) being arranged in the casting compound (reference numerals 62, 82) for fixing the buried magnets (reference numeral 41, see figures 8, 10). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the cooling channel in the casting compound as disclosed by Nishikuma et al. for the buried magnets of Engelhardt et al. in view of Matsumoto and Tardy et al. for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the cooling function in the device. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following references disclose embodiments of cooling passage configurations: US 11469635 B2 (Dums; Karl et al.), US 10020706 B2 (Kobes; Michael et al.), US 20210273506 A1 (MASUKO; Tomoki et al.), US 20200366173 A1 (Walisko; David et al.), US 20180375395 A1 (YAMAGISHI; Yoshitada), US 20160261158 A1 (HORII; Masaki et al.), US 20140091651 A1 (Dorfstatter; Pirmin et al.). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEX W MOK whose telephone number is (571)272-9084. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Seye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEX W MOK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 13, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 25, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597815
ROTOR FOR A ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592625
PERMANENT MAGNET ARRANGEMENT OF A SHUTTLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592623
ROTOR STRUCTURE OF ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592622
TRANSVERSE FLUX ASYNCHRONOUS ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592613
CLOSED-CIRCUIT ROTOR COOLING ARRANGEMENT AND ELECTRIC MACHINE HAVING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+21.2%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1114 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month