Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/439,875

VEHICLE FRONT STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 13, 2024
Examiner
SHANSKE, JASON D
Art Unit
3614
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Honda Motor Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
377 granted / 491 resolved
+24.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
505
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 491 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, line 8, “the bracket” is confusing as there are 2 brackets recited in the claim. For clarity, it is suggested that the bracket recited in line 3 be preceded with an adjective. Dependent claims should be changed accordingly. In claim 3, line 2, it is unclear how the shock absorbing bracket can have flanges at both open ends and confusing as to what the open ends are. In claim 3, lines 4-5, it is unclear as to which bracket the recitation is referring to as there are two brackets recited in previous claims. Note that “par” in line 5 should be changed to –pair--. In claim 5, it is unclear as to which bracket the recitation is referring to. In claim 6, line 2, it is unclear as to which bracket the recitation is referring to. In claim 9, lines 4-5, each recitation of “the hole” is confusing because in lines 2-3 it is recited that the brackets are “respectively formed with holes”. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of record neither teaches nor discloses a vehicle front structure as claimed in claimed 1 comprising an upper beam to which a headlight is fixed; a bracket installed side by side with the upper beam and having a front end in a vehicle front-rear direction thereof fixed to a bulkhead and a rear end in the vehicle front-rear direction thereof fixed to a lower member; a shock absorbing bracket arranged so as to be held between the upper beam and the bracket; and an airbag sensor arranged in vicinity to the shock absorbing bracket. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL N DICKSON whose telephone number is (571)272-7742. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 7:30 - 4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PAUL N. DICKSON Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit 3616 /PAUL N DICKSON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3614
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 13, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600479
MANUALLY-CONVERTIBLE SEAT FOR AN AIRCRAFT PASSENGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12552246
UTILITY VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12545066
AUTONOMOUS TRAILER CONNECTIVITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12533995
BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLE TEMPERATURE-REGULATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12485822
GRIPPING SYSTEM FOR AN INDUSTRIAL VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 491 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month