Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/439,887

CONFIGURED GRANTS WITH MULTIPLE TRANSMISSION OCCASIONS AND HARQ ID DETERMINATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 13, 2024
Examiner
SHAHEED, KHALID W
Art Unit
2643
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
MediaTek Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
694 granted / 840 resolved
+20.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
881
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 840 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Detailed Action Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Should applicant desire to obtain the benefit of foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) prior to declaration of an interference, a certified English translation of the foreign application must be submitted in reply to this action. 37 CFR 41.154(b) and 41.202(e). Failure to provide a certified translation may result in no benefit being accorded for the non-English application. Applicant cannot rely upon the certified copy of the foreign priority application to overcome this rejection because a translation of said application has not been made of record in accordance with 37 CFR 1.55. When an English language translation of a non-English language foreign application is required, the translation must be that of the certified copy (of the foreign application as filed) submitted together with a statement that the translation of the certified copy is accurate. See MPEP §§ 215 and 216. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2 & 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 (R1-2301605). Regarding claim 1, method of wireless communication of a user equipment (UE), comprising: configuring a Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) process identification (ID) determination mechanism (See page 1, “HARQ process ID determination”) for uplink transmission according to a plurality of parameters (see uplink, bottom page 1-2); obtaining, based on the HARQ process ID determination mechanism and the parameters, a HARQ process ID for each of a plurality of Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) transmission occasions (see PUSCH and HARQ Process ID determination, page 1-2, bottom to top); and performing an uplink transmission with the PUSCH transmission occasions identified by the HARQ process IDs (see “uplink transmissions” and HARQ PROCESS ID, page 1-2), wherein the parameters in the HARQ process ID determination mechanism include a parameter total-NrofOccasions-PerCGPeriod representing a total number of available PUSCH transmission occasions in a single configured grant (CG) period (see page 2, PUSCH transmission occasions in single CG period, same parameter by different name), and a parameter time-Gap-MultipleOccasions representing a time gap between two successive PUSCH transmission occasions (see page 2, time offset parameter configured to indicate gap between 1st and 2nd transmission occasions, page 2, here same definition by different name). Regarding claim 2, method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving, from a base station, configured scheduling information by radio resource control (RRC) signaling, wherein the configured scheduling information includes the parameters in the HARQ process ID determination mechanism and information indicating the HARQ process ID determination mechanism (see HARQ process ID determination, page 2). Regarding claim 13, apparatus for wireless communication, the apparatus being a user equipment (UE), comprising: a memory (see UE page, 1, inherently requires memory); and at least one processor coupled to the memory and configured to: configure a Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) process identification (ID) determination (see HARQ process ID determination, page 2) mechanism for uplink transmission according to a plurality of parameters, wherein the parameters include a parameter total-NrofOccasions-PerCGPeriod representing a total number of available PUSCH (see PUSCH, page 1) transmission occasions in a single configured grant (CG) period (see page 2, PUSCH transmission occasions in single CG period, same parameter by different name), and a parameter time-Gap-MultipleOccasions representing a time gap between two successive PUSCH transmission occasions (see page 2, time offset parameter configured to indicate gap between 1st and 2nd transmission occasions, page 2, here same definition by different name); obtain, based on the HARQ process ID determination mechanism and the parameters, a HARQ process ID for each of a plurality of Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) transmission occasions; and perform an uplink transmission with the PUSCH transmission occasions identified by the HARQ process IDs. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-12, 14-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kwak US 2022/0322404 A1 TSAI et al. US 2022/0311558 A1 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to K. WILFORD SHAHEED whose telephone number is (469) 295-9175. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 9 am-6pm; CST; ALT Friday. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. The examiner’s Supervisor, Jinsong Hu, can be reached at (571)272-3965, where attempts to reach the examiner are unsuccessful. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHALID W SHAHEED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 13, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587228
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS FOR A NETWORK DEVICE TRANSCEIVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581450
Wireless Communications Method and Related Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574792
PREDICTIVE TRANSMISSION RATE ADAPTATION IN WIRELESS NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574453
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD FOR PERFORMING COMMUNICATION CONNECTION WITH PERIPHERAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574775
EARLY MEASUREMENT REPORTING VERIFICATION FOR NON-CONNECTED MODE USER EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 840 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month