Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/439,937

FOUR-WAY INDEXABLE CUTTING INSERT AND CUTTING TOOL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 13, 2024
Examiner
AFZALI, SARANG
Art Unit
3726
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Iscar Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
693 granted / 944 resolved
+3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +45% interview lift
Without
With
+44.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
975
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
41.9%
+1.9% vs TC avg
§102
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
§112
32.4%
-7.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 944 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I (claims 1-9 and 15-20) in the reply filed on 08/17/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the search for cutting tool of Group I requires search for cutting insert of Group II and although the two groups have additional limitations, however, no additional search is required even if a cutting tool and a cutting insert have separate status in the art. This is not found persuasive because Applicant is not arguing that inventions are not independent or distinct. If Applicant has elected Group II (claims 10-14) then naturally a search for a cutting insert does not include a search for a cutting tool. In addition, the claims in the two identified distinct groups include different designs and examiner has clearly identified features required in one group and not the other, which would predictably require different search queries and potentially yield art not necessarily suitable for rejecting the claims of the other group. In addition, Applicant’s argument that the identified groups would include some overlap is insufficient to show that there is no burden for examining between the groups. Applicant has not presented specifically what alleged deficiency the restriction analysis includes. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 10-14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 7-8, 15 and 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hecht (US 20070231089A1). As applied to claims 1 and 15, Hecht teaches a cutting tool (10) including a cutting tool insert holder (14) wherein a cutting insert (12) is held at several abutment regions resulting in the regions applying reaction forces to the cutting insert to better secure the insert during a cutting operation. Hecht teaches the cutting tool (10) comprising: the tool holder (14) defining a central longitudinal holder axis, a forward holder direction extending in a direction parallel to the central longitudinal holder axis, and a rearward holder direction opposite the forward holder direction, the tool holder including an insert coupling portion comprising a forward facing forward holder surface located at a forward tool end of the tool holder, the forward tool end delimiting the tool holder in the forward holder direction, the insert coupling portion defining an insert seat, the insert seat opens out through the forward facing forward holder surface (Figs. 4 and 5), the insert seat defined by: a top holder abutment surface (70); a bottom holder abutment surface opposing the top holder abutment surface (62); and a holder side abutment surface (48) connecting the top holder abutment surface and the bottom holder abutment surface; a four-way indexable plate-shaped cutting insert (the cutting insert 12 is five-way indexable which is a multi-indexable including two, three and four way, see paragraph [0022]) releasably secured to the tool holder, the cutting insert being indexable about a central insert axis thereof, the cutting insert having a first axial insert direction along the central insert axis, a second insert direction along the central insert axis opposite the first axial insert direction, and a circumferential insert direction about the central insert axis, the cutting insert defining an insert median plane orthogonal to the central insert axis, the cutting insert (12) comprising: a base body centered about the central insert axis (portion of 12 labeled 20 in Fig. 2); a first insert side surface (16); a second insert side surface (16, two identical side surfaces with only one shown in Fig. 2, paragraph [0022]) opposite the first insert side surface, the insert median plane disposed between the first insert side surface and the second insert side surface; a peripheral insert surface (18) connecting the first insert side surface and the second insert side surface; and four cutting arms circumferentially distributed about the central insert axis (Fig. 3 shows 4 cutting arms), the four cutting arms including, in the circumferential insert direction, an active arm (any of 26a in Fig. 3 or 27 in Fig. 6), an upper arm (26c), an inner arm (26d), and a lower arm (26e), the active arm being the cutting arm that extends farthest in the forward holder direction and protrudes in the forward holder direction from the forward holder surface (Fig. 6), each cutting arm extending from the base in a direction away from the central insert axis, the peripheral insert surface of each cutting arm comprising: a rake surface (34) facing in the circumferential insert direction; a relief surface (36) facing in a circumferential direction opposite the circumferential insert direction; a cutting edge (32) formed at an intersection of the rake surface and the relief surface; a top arm surface extending from the rake surface towards the base body; and a bottom arm surface extending from the relief surface towards the base body (see Fig. 2); a fastener (78) releasably securing the cutting insert in the insert seat with exactly four pairs of abutting surfaces therebetween defined as (see paragraphs [0027] and [0031]): the first insert side surface (flat abutment surface 20 of end surface 16) abutting the holder side abutment surface (48, see paragraph [0027]); the bottom arm surface of the upper arm abutting the top holder abutment surface (76 in Fig. 6); the bottom arm surface of the lower arm abutting the bottom holder abutment surface (66 in Fig. 6); and the top arm surface of the inner arm abutting the bottom holder abutment surface (68 in Fig. 6). As applied to claim 2, Hecht teaches the invention cited including wherein the tool holder further comprises a shank portion comprising a rearward tool end, the rearward tool end delimiting the tool holder in the rearward holder direction; a top holder surface; and a front holder surface, the top holder surface and the front holder surface connected to one another and to the forward holder surface (see Fig. 4). As applied to claims 7, 8, 18 and 19, Hecht teaches the invention cited including wherein the first insert side surface comprises a first insert abutment portion, located at the base body, and a first arm side portion, located at the four cutting arms, the first insert abutment portion being farther away from the insert median plane than at least a portion of the first arm side portion (as in claims 7 and 18) and wherein the second insert side surface comprises a second insert abutment portion, located at the base body, and a second arm side portion, located at the four cutting arms, the second insert abutment portion being farther away from the insert median plane than at least a portion of the second arm side portion (as in claims 8 and 19, see flat abutment surface 20, paragraph [0022], Fig. 2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hecht (US 20070231089A1). As applied to claims 5 and 16, Hecht teaches the invention the invention cited including wherein an outer diameter OD belonging to an imaginary circumscribing circle, defined as the smallest circle circumscribing the cutting insert, and an inner diameter ID belonging to an imaginary inscribed circle, defined as the largest circle inscribed by the cutting insert, fulfills the following condition: 0.3 * OD ≤ ID ≤ 0.6 * OD (see Hecht, Figs. 3 and 3 showing the cutting insert 12 and holder 14 of cutting tool 10 having elements and relationships similar to the claimed limitations shown in instant Figs. 4 and 11). If Applicant does not agree that Hecht teaches claims 5 and 16 condition 0.3 * OD ≤ ID ≤ 0.6 * OD being met, then it has been held that where the only difference between the prior art and the claims is a recitation of relative dimensions of the claimed device and a device having the claimed relative dimensions would not perform differently than the prior art device, the claimed device is not patentably distinct from the prior art device. One of ordinary skill would have been capable of determining the appropriate OD and ID to meet the claimed condition and ranges in order to provide desirable and suitable nesting of the cutting insert within the cutting tool holder to accommodate the loads incurred during the operation which would result into a more accurate and precise machining operation with minimal chance of damaging the workpiece or the cutting insert. Claim(s) 6, 9, 17 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hecht (US 20070231089A1) in view of Otsuka et al. (US 20240189918A1, hereinafter “Otsuka”). As applied to claims 6, 9, 17 and 20, Hecht teaches the invention cited but does not explicitly teach the tool holder further defines an inlet and a top outlet, the top outlet in fluid communication with the inlet, the top outlet opening out to the forward holder surface; and wherein in a top view, the top outlet is located directly in the rearward holder direction from the active arm (as in claims 6 and 17) and wherein the first insert side surface further comprises a coolant groove recessed into the first insert abutment portion and opening out to the first arm side portion, the tool holder defining a side outlet and an inlet, the side outlet in fluid communication with the inlet, the side outlet opening out to the holder side abutment surface (as in claims 9 and 20). Otsuka teaches an indexable cutting tool (1) and cutting insert (20) with the tool body including a coolant flow passage (12) for coolant supply, the coolant flow passage (12) being provided to the tool body; an opening part (13) that is provided to the insert mounting seat (11); and a recessed part (23) that forms a flow passage in which at least part of the coolant discharged from the opening part flows, the recessed part being provided to the cutting insert (abstract, Figs. 1-2 and 7-8). Otsuka further teaches that the cutting insert 20 is provided with recessed parts 23 to form the flow passage in which at least part of the coolant 50 discharged from the opening part 13 of the coolant flow passage 12 flows (see, for example, FIG. 4). These recessed parts 23 and opening part 13 of the shank 10 are provided to face toward the cutting edges 21 in a state where the cutting insert 20 is mounted on the insert mounting seat 11, and form a coolant discharge part 30 having such a shape that the coolant 50 is discharged toward at least part of the cutting edges 21. The insert mounting seat 11 of the shank 10 is provided with the opening part 13 of the coolant flow passage 12 (see FIGS. 2 and 5). A portion of a bottom surface (a face in contact with the insert mounting seat 11) 24 of the cutting insert 20 that faces this opening part 13 in a state where the cutting insert 20 is mounted on the insert mounting seat 11 is provided with the recessed parts 23 (see, for example, FIGS. 3 and 4). These opening part 13 and recessed parts 23 are provided to form the coolant discharge part 30 that can discharge the coolant 50 supplied through the coolant flow passage 12 toward at least part of the cutting edges 21, and, preferably, a machining point (a portion at which the cutting insert 20 cuts a workpiece) (see FIG. 1). These opening part 13 and recessed parts 23 are preferably formed in a shape that can make the coolant 50 reliably reach the cutting edges 21 particularly even when machining such as inner diameter grooving of a small diameter or grooving of a narrow groove width, with which it is difficult for the coolant 50 to reach a machining point, is performed. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to employ into the device of Hecht an inlet and a top outlet, the top outlet in fluid communication with the inlet, the top outlet opening out to the forward holder surface; and wherein in a top view, the top outlet is located directly in the rearward holder direction from the active arm and a coolant groove recessed into the first insert abutment portion and opening out to the first arm side portion, the tool holder defining a side outlet and an inlet, the side outlet in fluid communication with the inlet, the side outlet opening out to the holder side abutment surface, as taught by Otsuka, as an effective means of providing cooling and lubrication to the machining point thus resulting in not only prolonging operational life of the tool but also enhancing the quality of machined surface. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-8, 15-16 and 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hecht (US 8,678,718, hereinafter “Hecht ‘718”) in view of Schiffers (US 6,612,207). As applied to claims 1 and 15, Hecht ‘718 teaches a cutting tool (40, Figs. 1-7) having an indexable cutting insert (20) with four cutting portions, the cutting insert is securable within a holder portion (42) in four index positions by means of a fastener (44). Hecht ‘718 teaches the cutting tool (40) comprising: the tool holder (42) defining a central longitudinal holder axis, a forward holder direction extending in a direction parallel to the central longitudinal holder axis, and a rearward holder direction opposite the forward holder direction, the tool holder including an insert coupling portion comprising a forward facing forward holder surface located at a forward tool end of the tool holder, the forward tool end delimiting the tool holder in the forward holder direction, the insert coupling portion defining an insert seat, the insert seat opens out through the forward facing forward holder surface (Figs. 3-7), the insert seat defined by: a top holder abutment surface (70); a bottom holder abutment surface opposing the top holder abutment surface (62); and a holder side abutment surface (48) connecting the top holder abutment surface and the bottom holder abutment surface; a four-way indexable plate-shaped cutting insert (insert 20, indexable two-way about C axis and two-way about A1 or A2 axis) releasably secured to the tool holder, the cutting insert being indexable about a central insert axis thereof (C axis), the cutting insert having a first axial insert direction along the central insert axis, a second insert direction along the central insert axis opposite the first axial insert direction, and a circumferential insert direction about the central insert axis, the cutting insert defining an insert median plane orthogonal to the central insert axis, the cutting insert (12) comprising: a base body (see 30) centered about the central insert axis; a first insert side surface (22); a second insert side surface (22, two identical opposing surfaces as shown in Fig. 1, col. 3, lines 3-4) opposite the first insert side surface, the insert median plane disposed between the first insert side surface and the second insert side surface; a peripheral insert surface (24) connecting the first insert side surface and the second insert side surface; and four cutting arms circumferentially distributed about the central insert axis (see Fig. 4), the four cutting arms including, in the circumferential insert direction, an active arm, an upper arm, an inner arm, and a lower arm, the active arm being the cutting arm that extends farthest in the forward holder direction and protrudes in the forward holder direction from the forward holder surface (see Fig. 4), each cutting arm extending from the base in a direction away from the central insert axis, the peripheral insert surface of each cutting arm comprising: a rake surface (34); a relief surface (36); a cutting edge (32) formed at an intersection of the rake surface and the relief surface; a top arm surface extending from the rake surface towards the base body; and a bottom arm surface extending from the relief surface towards the base body (see Fig. 1); a fastener (78) releasably securing the cutting insert in the insert seat with exactly four pairs of abutting surfaces therebetween defined as (see Fig. 4): the first insert side surface (at portion 30 of end surface 22) abutting the holder side abutment surface (62); and the top arm surface of the inner arm abutting the bottom holder abutment surface (54 in Fig. 4). Hecht ‘718 does not explicitly teach the orientation of the cutting portions by not teaching that each cutting arm comprises the rake surface facing in the circumferential insert direction, that the relief surface facing in a circumferential direction opposite the circumferential insert direction, that the bottom arm surface of the upper arm abutting the top holder abutment surface and that the bottom arm surface of the lower arm abutting the bottom holder abutment surface. Schiffers teaches a cutting tool including a holding element (8, Fig. 2) receiving an indexable cutting insert (51) with four cutting portions, the cutting insert is securable within the holder portion (8) in positions by means of a fastener (9). Schiffers teaches the cutting insert (51) has rake surface facing in the circumferential insert direction, the relief surface facing in a circumferential direction opposite the circumferential insert direction, the bottom arm surface of the upper arm abutting the top holder abutment surface and the bottom arm surface of the lower arm abutting the bottom holder abutment surface (Figs. 1-2) and that once inserted into the holder (8), the cutting insert becomes into contact with the holding element at four locations 10’, 10”, 10’” and 10’” (col. 7, lines 26-41, 55-58, Figs. 1 and 2). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the at the time the invention was filed to modify the cutting insert of Hecht ‘718 to have the rake surface facing in the circumferential insert direction, the relief surface facing in a circumferential direction opposite the circumferential insert direction, the bottom arm surface of the upper arm abutting the top holder abutment surface and the bottom arm surface of the lower arm abutting the bottom holder abutment surface, as taught by Schiffers, as a matter of use of known techniques to improve similar devices in the same way (see MPEP 2143, KSR, Rationale “C”). One having ordinary skill in the art would reasonably expect that the modification of the elements of cutting insert of Hecht ‘718 to have the claimed surface orientations in a conventional manner taught by Schiffers would improve the cutting operation while providing improved clamping and holding of the insert within the holder without a modification of the principles of operation of Hecht ‘781. As applied to claim 2, Hecht ‘718 as modified by Schiffers teaches the invention cited including Hecht ‘718 teaches wherein the tool holder further comprises a shank portion comprising a rearward tool end, the rearward tool end delimiting the tool holder in the rearward holder direction; a top holder surface; and a front holder surface, the top holder surface and the front holder surface connected to one another and to the forward holder surface (see Fig. 3). As applied to claims 3 and 4, Hecht ‘718 as modified by Schiffers teaches the invention the invention cited including wherein the insert seat opens out through the front holder surface; the top holder surface comprises a top coupling segment located in the insert coupling portion; a top shank segment located in the shank portion and closer to the central longitudinal holder axis than the top coupling segment; and a rearwardly facing coupling segment stopper located between the top coupling segment and the top shank segment; a tool overhang length OL defined parallel to the central longitudinal holder axis from the coupling segment stopper to the cutting edge of the active arm; and an outer diameter OD of an imaginary circumscribing circle, defined as the smallest circle circumscribing the cutting insert, fulfills the following condition: 0.7 * OD ≤ OL ≤ 1.2 * OD (as in claim 3) and wherein a holder overhang length, defined parallel to the central longitudinal holder axis from the coupling segment stopper to the forward holder surface, is in a range of 10 mm to 25 mm (as in claim 4, see Hecht ‘718, Figs. 1 and 7 showing the cutting insert 20 and holder 42 having elements and relationships similar to the claimed limitations shown in instant Figs. 4 and 11). If Applicant does not agree that Hecht ‘718 as modified by Schiffers teaches the claim 3 condition 0.7 * OD ≤ OL ≤ 1.2 * OD and claim 4 range of 10 mm to 25 mm being met, then it has been held that where the only difference between the prior art and the claims is a recitation of relative dimensions of the claimed device and a device having the claimed relative dimensions would not perform differently than the prior art device, the claimed device is not patentably distinct from the prior art device. One of ordinary skill would have been capable of determining the appropriate OD and OL to meet the claimed condition and ranges in order to provide desirable and suitable nesting of the cutting insert within the cutting tool holder to accommodate the loads incurred during the operation which would result into a more accurate and precise machining operation with minimal chance of damaging the workpiece or the cutting insert. As applied to claims 5 and 16, Hecht ‘718 as modified by Schiffers teaches the invention the invention cited including wherein an outer diameter OD belonging to an imaginary circumscribing circle, defined as the smallest circle circumscribing the cutting insert, and an inner diameter ID belonging to an imaginary inscribed circle, defined as the largest circle inscribed by the cutting insert, fulfills the following condition: 0.3 * OD ≤ ID ≤ 0.6 * OD (see Hecht ‘718, Figs. 4 and 7 showing the cutting insert 20 and holder 42 of cutting tool 40 having elements and relationships similar to the claimed limitations shown in instant Figs. 4 and 11). If Applicant does not agree that Hecht ‘718 as modified by Schiffers teaches claims 5 and 16 condition 0.3 * OD ≤ ID ≤ 0.6 * OD being met, then it has been held that where the only difference between the prior art and the claims is a recitation of relative dimensions of the claimed device and a device having the claimed relative dimensions would not perform differently than the prior art device, the claimed device is not patentably distinct from the prior art device. One of ordinary skill would have been capable of determining the appropriate OD and ID to meet the claimed condition and ranges in order to provide desirable and suitable nesting of the cutting insert within the cutting tool holder to accommodate the loads incurred during the operation which would result into a more accurate and precise machining operation with minimal chance of damaging the workpiece or the cutting insert. As applied to claims 7, 8, 18 and 19, Hecht ‘718 as modified by Schiffers teaches the invention cited including wherein the first insert side surface comprises a first insert abutment portion, located at the base body, and a first arm side portion, located at the four cutting arms, the first insert abutment portion being farther away from the insert median plane than at least a portion of the first arm side portion (as in claims 7 and 18) and wherein the second insert side surface comprises a second insert abutment portion, located at the base body, and a second arm side portion, located at the four cutting arms, the second insert abutment portion being farther away from the insert median plane than at least a portion of the second arm side portion (as in claims 8 and 19, see Hecht ‘718, col. 3, lines 3-16, Fig. 1). Claim(s) 6, 9, 17 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hecht (US 8,678,718, hereinafter “Hecht ‘718”) in view of Schiffers (US 6,612,207) as applied to claims 1 and 15 above, and further in view of Otsuka et al. (US 20240189918A1, hereinafter “Otsuka”). As applied to claims 6, 9, 17 and 20, Hecht ‘718 as modified by Schiffers teaches the invention cited but does not explicitly teach the tool holder further defines an inlet and a top outlet, the top outlet in fluid communication with the inlet, the top outlet opening out to the forward holder surface; and wherein in a top view, the top outlet is located directly in the rearward holder direction from the active arm (as in claims 6 and 17) and wherein the first insert side surface further comprises a coolant groove recessed into the first insert abutment portion and opening out to the first arm side portion, the tool holder defining a side outlet and an inlet, the side outlet in fluid communication with the inlet, the side outlet opening out to the holder side abutment surface (as in claims 9 and 20). Otsuka teaches an indexable cutting tool (1) and cutting insert (20) with the tool body including a coolant flow passage (12) for coolant supply, the coolant flow passage (12) being provided to the tool body; an opening part (13) that is provided to the insert mounting seat (11); and a recessed part (23) that forms a flow passage in which at least part of the coolant discharged from the opening part flows, the recessed part being provided to the cutting insert (abstract, Figs. 1-2 and 7-8). Otsuka further teaches that the cutting insert 20 is provided with recessed parts 23 to form the flow passage in which at least part of the coolant 50 discharged from the opening part 13 of the coolant flow passage 12 flows (see, for example, FIG. 4). These recessed parts 23 and opening part 13 of the shank 10 are provided to face toward the cutting edges 21 in a state where the cutting insert 20 is mounted on the insert mounting seat 11, and form a coolant discharge part 30 having such a shape that the coolant 50 is discharged toward at least part of the cutting edges 21. The insert mounting seat 11 of the shank 10 is provided with the opening part 13 of the coolant flow passage 12 (see FIGS. 2 and 5). A portion of a bottom surface (a face in contact with the insert mounting seat 11) 24 of the cutting insert 20 that faces this opening part 13 in a state where the cutting insert 20 is mounted on the insert mounting seat 11 is provided with the recessed parts 23 (see, for example, FIGS. 3 and 4). These opening part 13 and recessed parts 23 are provided to form the coolant discharge part 30 that can discharge the coolant 50 supplied through the coolant flow passage 12 toward at least part of the cutting edges 21, and, preferably, a machining point (a portion at which the cutting insert 20 cuts a workpiece) (see FIG. 1). These opening part 13 and recessed parts 23 are preferably formed in a shape that can make the coolant 50 reliably reach the cutting edges 21 particularly even when machining such as inner diameter grooving of a small diameter or grooving of a narrow groove width, with which it is difficult for the coolant 50 to reach a machining point, is performed. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to employ into the device of Hecht ‘718/Schiffers an inlet and a top outlet, the top outlet in fluid communication with the inlet, the top outlet opening out to the forward holder surface; and wherein in a top view, the top outlet is located directly in the rearward holder direction from the active arm and a coolant groove recessed into the first insert abutment portion and opening out to the first arm side portion, the tool holder defining a side outlet and an inlet, the side outlet in fluid communication with the inlet, the side outlet opening out to the holder side abutment surface, as taught by Otsuka, as an effective means of providing cooling and lubrication to the machining point thus resulting in not only prolonging operational life of the tool but also enhancing the quality of machined surface. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Henry et al. teaches toolholder has a head portion including a slot separating the head portion into a lower extension with a lower seat and an upper extension with an upper seat to retain a cutting insert. The head portion contains a coolant entrance passage, which receives coolant from a coolant source, and a coolant delivery passage, which discharges coolant toward a cutting insert. The cutting insert includes a top surface with an upwardly extending protuberance that can be engaged by the toolholder to rigidly mount the cutting insert in the head portion of the toolholder. The cutting insert further includes a coolant channel formed in the top surface of the cutting insert that is positioned directly opposite of the coolant discharge to enhance the flow rate of the coolant delivered to the cutting insert-workpiece interface (abstract, Figs. 1-10). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SARANG AFZALI whose telephone number is (571)272-8412. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7 am - 4 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Hong can be reached at 571-272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SARANG AFZALI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3726 09/19/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 13, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746629
SENSING TOOL HOLDER
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747913
SYSTEM AND METHOD TO RETROFIT CAN OVEN OR DRYER
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741309
INTERLOCKING PLATE HEAT EXCHANGER
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12721933
Methods of Making an Interventional Medical Device Useful in Performing Treatment under Magnetic Resonance Imaging
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722263
PULLER FOR SPRING CONNECTION OF TRAMPOLINE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+44.6%)
3y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 944 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month