Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/440,747

RETAINER RING MODULE AND CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Feb 13, 2024
Priority
Aug 29, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0113574
Examiner
SOTO, CHRISTOPHER ASHLEY
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
68 granted / 129 resolved
-17.3% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
181
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 129 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1, 15, and 19 have been amended. Claims 2-14, 16-18, and 20 have been canceled. Claims 21-37 have been added. Claims 1, 15, 19, and 21-37 have been examined on the merits. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see page 9, filed 06/24/2026, with respect to the previous 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) rejections are persuasive. The previous 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) rejections have been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see pages 9-10, filed 06/24/2026, with respect to the previous 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) rejections are not persuasive. With respect to “enclosed”, Merriam-Webster defines the word as: “closed in or fenced off”. The examiner believes, given the common definition, ADACHI still reads on the language of the claim. The examiner understands the distinction between the art and the application, but the language as currently presented is still broad. The examiner recommends focusing on the shutter mechanism in conjunction with the angled pipe-like passages given the new reference of LIN (JPH11226866A), as detailed below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 15, 19, 21, 22, 24, 26-31, 33, 34, and 37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by ADACHI (US 20180229345 A1). Referring to claim 1: ADACHI discloses a retainer ring module (shown in Fig. 1) comprising: a retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B) on a lower surface of a polishing head (20 Figs. 1, 2A, 2B, and 9), wherein the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B) is configured to surround a substrate (W Fig. 2B) on an upper surface of a polishing pad (10 Figs. 1, 2B, 6A, 6B, and 9) to which slurry (slurry delivered from 30 Figs. 1 and 6A) is provided; and at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) disposed at the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B), wherein the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) is configured to introduce the slurry outside (shown in Fig. 6A) the retainer ring into a space (shown in Fig. 6B; [0050]) between the substrate (W Fig. 2B) and the polishing pad (10 Figs. 1, 2B, 6A, 6B, and 9), wherein the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) comprises: an inlet (T2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) disposed at an outer side surface (OS2 Fig. 1-A inserted below) of the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B) to introduce the slurry, and an outlet (T1 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) disposed at another surface (surface of R1 of 21 Figs. 2A and 2B) of the retainer ring to discharge the slurry, and wherein the entirety of the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) is enclosed (when P2 of R2 is aligned and covers OP1, the entirety of the at least one slurry passage is enclosed by P2 and upper surface of 21 shown in Fig. 2A; “enclosed” as defined by Merriam-Webster is 1: “closed in or fenced off”) by the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B). PNG media_image1.png 413 824 media_image1.png Greyscale Referring to claim 15: ADACHI discloses a retainer ring module (shown in Fig. 1) comprising: a retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B) on a lower surface of a polishing head (20 Figs. 1, 2A, 2B, and 9), wherein the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B) is configured to surround a substrate (W Fig. 2B) on an upper surface of a polishing pad (10 Figs. 1, 2B, 6A, 6B, and 9) to which slurry (slurry delivered from 30 Figs. 1 and 6A) is provided; and at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) disposed at the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B), wherein the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) is configured to introduce the slurry outside (shown in Fig. 6A) the retainer ring into a space (shown in Fig. 6B; [0050]) between the substrate (W Fig. 2B) and the polishing pad (10 Figs. 1, 2B, 6A, 6B, and 9), wherein the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) comprises: an inlet (T2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) disposed at an outer side surface (OS2 Fig. 1-A inserted above) of the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B) to introduce the slurry; and an outlet (T1 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) disposed at another surface (surface of R1 of 21 Figs. 2A and 2B) of the retainer ring to discharge the slurry, and wherein the outlet (T1 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) of the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) is disposed only at a lower surface (lower surface shown in Figs. 3A and 3B) of the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B). Referring to claim 19: ADACHI discloses a retainer ring module (shown in Fig. 1) comprising: a retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B) on a lower surface of a polishing head (20 Figs. 1, 2A, 2B, and 9), wherein the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B) is configured to surround a substrate (W Fig. 2B) on an upper surface of a polishing pad (10 Figs. 1, 2B, 6A, 6B, and 9) to which slurry (slurry delivered from 30 Figs. 1 and 6A) is provided; and at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) disposed at the retainer ring, wherein the at least one slurry passage is configured to introduce the slurry outside the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B) into a space (shown in Fig. 6B; [0050]) between the substrate (W Fig. 2B) and the polishing pad (10 Figs. 1, 2B, 6A, 6B, and 9); wherein the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) comprises: an inlet (T2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) disposed at an outer side surface (OS2 Fig. 1-A inserted above) of the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B) to introduce the slurry; and an outlet (T1 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) disposed at another surface (surface of R1 of 21 Figs. 2A and 2B) of the retainer ring to discharge the slurry, and wherein at least a portion of the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) is enclosed (when P2 of R2 is aligned and covers OP1, the entirety of the at least one slurry passage is enclosed by P2 and upper surface of 21 shown in Fig. 2A; “enclosed” as defined by Merriam-Webster is 1: “closed in or fenced off”) by the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B). Referring to claim 21: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 1, wherein the outlet (T1 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) of the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) is disposed at a lower surface (lower surface shown in Figs. 3A and 3B) of the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B). Referring to claim 22: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 1, wherein a portion of a lower surface (LS-1 Fig. 2-A inserted below) of the retainer ring below the outer side surface (OS2 Fig. 1-A inserted above) of the retainer ring is lower than a portion of the lower surface (LS-3 Fig. 2-A inserted below) of the retainer ring below an inner side surface (ISS Fig. 2-A inserted below) of the retainer ring. PNG media_image2.png 606 800 media_image2.png Greyscale Referring to claim 24: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 1, wherein the at least one slurry passage extends in a downward slant direction (“the first and second trenches T1 and T2 may be inclined” [0039]) toward a central portion (“the first and second trenches T1 and T2 may be inclined and extended in some degree from the radially inward or outward direction of the first and second retainer rings R1 and R2” [0039]) of the retainer ring. Referring to claim 26: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 1, wherein the inlet (T2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) and the outlet (T1 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) of the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) have an arc shape or a circular shape (arc and circular shape of pluralities of T1 and T2 shown in Figs. 4A and 4B). Referring to claim 27: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 1, comprising a shutter (P1/P2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) configured to control an opening ratio (shown in Figs. 6A-6C) of the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C). Referring to claim 28: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 15, wherein the entirety of the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) is enclosed (when P2 of R2 is aligned and covers OP1, the entirety of the at least one slurry passage is enclosed by P2 and upper surface of 21 shown in Fig. 2A; “enclosed” as defined by Merriam-Webster is 1: “closed in or fenced off”) by the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B). Referring to claim 29: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 28, comprising a shutter (P1/P2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) configured to control an opening ratio (shown in Figs. 6A-6C) of the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C). Referring to claim 30: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 29, wherein a portion of a lower surface (LS-2 Fig. 2-A inserted above) of the retainer ring below an inner side surface (ISS Fig. 2-A inserted above) of the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B) is spaced apart from the polishing pad (10 Figs. 1, 2B, 6A, 6B, and 9). Referring to claim 31: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 15, wherein a portion of a lower surface (LS-1 Fig. 2-A inserted above) of the retainer ring below the outer side surface (OSS Fig. 1-A inserted above) of the retainer ring is lower than a portion of the lower surface (LS-3 Fig. 2-A inserted above) of the retainer ring below an inner side surface (ISS Fig. 2-A inserted above) of the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B). Referring to claim 33: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 15, wherein the inlet (T2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) and the outlet (T1 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) of the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C) have an arc shape or a circular shape (arc and circular shape of pluralities of T1 and T2 shown in Figs. 4A and 4B). Referring to claim 34: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 19, wherein a portion of a lower surface (LS-2 Fig. 2-A inserted above) of the retainer ring below an inner side surface (ISS Fig. 2-A inserted above) of the retainer ring (21/22 Figs. 2A and 2B) is spaced apart from the polishing pad (10 Figs. 1, 2B, 6A, 6B, and 9). Referring to claim 37: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 34, comprising a shutter (P1/P2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) configured to control an opening ratio (shown in Figs. 6A-6C) of the at least one slurry passage (OP1/OP2 Figs. 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B, and 6C). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 23, 25, 32, 35, and 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ADACHI (US 20180229345 A1) and LIN (JPH11226866A). Referring to claim 23: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 22, but is silent on wherein the portion of the lower surface of the retainer ring below the inner side surface of the retainer ring is spaced apart from the polishing pad. LIN in an analogous ring module (Figs. 8A-8C; “The formation of the slurry passages 82 can provide a flow of slurry to the retaining ring and a flow of slurry distributed to the surface of the wafer being polished.” [0024]) teaches wherein the portion of the lower surface (LP Fig. 3-A inserted below) of the retainer ring (80 Fig. 8A) below the inner side surface (inner surface of 82 IP Fig. 3-A inserted below) of the retainer ring (80 Fig. 8A) is spaced apart from the polishing pad (10 Fig. 1). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the slurry passages of ADACHI with the configuration as taught by LIN for the purpose of having the slurry passages deliver slurry when the exterior slurry level has reached a certain height. PNG media_image3.png 221 389 media_image3.png Greyscale Referring to claim 25: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 1, but is silent on wherein a lowermost portion of the inlet of the at least one slurry passage is positioned higher than a lower surface of the retainer ring. LIN in an analogous ring module (Figs. 8A-8C; “The formation of the slurry passages 82 can provide a flow of slurry to the retaining ring and a flow of slurry distributed to the surface of the wafer being polished.” [0024]) teaches wherein a lowermost portion (LP Fig. 3-A inserted above) of the inlet of the at least one slurry passage (82) is positioned higher than a lower surface (lower surface of 80 shown in Fig. 3-A inserted above) of the retainer ring (80 Fig. 8A). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the slurry passages of ADACHI with the configuration as taught by LIN for the purpose of having the slurry passages deliver slurry when the exterior slurry level has reached a certain height. Referring to claim 32: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 15, but is silent on wherein a lowermost portion of the inlet of the at least one slurry passage is positioned higher than a lower surface of the retainer ring. LIN in an analogous ring module (Figs. 8A-8C; “The formation of the slurry passages 82 can provide a flow of slurry to the retaining ring and a flow of slurry distributed to the surface of the wafer being polished.” [0024]) teaches wherein a lowermost portion (LP Fig. 3-A inserted above) of the inlet of the at least one slurry passage (82) is positioned higher than a lower surface (lower surface of 80 shown in Fig. 3-A inserted above) of the retainer ring (80 Fig. 8A). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the slurry passages of ADACHI with the configuration as taught by LIN for the purpose of having the slurry passages deliver slurry when the exterior slurry level has reached a certain height. Referring to claim 35: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 34, but is silent on wherein the outlet of the at least one slurry passage is disposed only at the lower surface of the retainer ring. LIN in an analogous ring module (Figs. 8A-8C; “The formation of the slurry passages 82 can provide a flow of slurry to the retaining ring and a flow of slurry distributed to the surface of the wafer being polished.” [0024]) teaches wherein the outlet (outlet of 82 facing interior) of the at least one slurry passage (82) is disposed only at the lower surface (LP Fig. 3-A inserted above) of the retainer ring (80 Fig. 8A). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the slurry passages of ADACHI with the configuration as taught by LIN for the purpose of having the slurry passages deliver slurry when the exterior slurry level has reached a certain height. Referring to claim 36: ADACHI discloses the retainer ring module of claim 35, but is silent on wherein a portion of the lower surface of the retainer ring below the outer side surface of the retainer ring is lower than the portion of the lower surface of the retainer ring below the inner side surface of the retainer ring. LIN in an analogous ring module (Figs. 8A-8C; “The formation of the slurry passages 82 can provide a flow of slurry to the retaining ring and a flow of slurry distributed to the surface of the wafer being polished.” [0024]) teaches wherein a portion of the lower surface (lower surface of 80 shown in Fig. 3-A inserted above) of the retainer ring (80 Fig. 8A) below the outer side surface (OSS Fig, 3-A inserted above) of the retainer ring is lower than the portion of the lower surface (LP Fig. 3-A inserted above) of the retainer ring (80 Fig. 8A) below the inner side surface (inner surface of 82 IP Fig. 3-A inserted above) of the retainer ring. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the slurry passages of ADACHI with the configuration as taught by LIN for the purpose of having the slurry passages deliver slurry when the exterior slurry level has reached a certain height. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER SOTO whose telephone number is (571)272-8172. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8a.m. - 5 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Carter can be reached at 571-272-4475. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CHRISTOPHER SOTO Examiner Art Unit 3723 /CHRISTOPHER SOTO/Examiner, Art Unit 3723 /MONICA S CARTER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 13, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 20, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 20, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 24, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12708982
MACHINE TOOL FOR THE ROBOT-SUPPORTED MACHINING OF WORKPIECES WITH TWO ROTATABLE TOOLS
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12695280
WIRE COATING REMOVAL DEVICE AND WIRE FORMING SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12648410
CHUCK STRUCTURE OF SEMICONDUCTOR CLEANING APPARATUS AND SEMICONDUCTOR CLEANING APPARATUS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12600009
GRINDING METHOD USING NANOLAYER-LUBRICATED DIAMOND GRINDING WHEEL BASED ON SHOCK WAVE CAVITATION EFFECT
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12576498
MULTI-TOOL COMBINING FIREFIGHTING IMPLEMENTS
2y 2m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+27.2%)
2y 12m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 129 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month