Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/441,749

Keyboard Gasket Mount System

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 14, 2024
Priority
Feb 20, 2023 — provisional 63/485,978
Examiner
FLORES, ROBERTO W
Art Unit
2621
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Glorious LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
63%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allowance Rate
269 granted / 543 resolved
-12.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
586
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
68.1%
+28.1% vs TC avg
§102
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 543 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-9, 11-13 and 15-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xu et al. U.S. Patent Publication No. 2021/0373674 (hereinafter Xu) and further in view of Song et al. U.S. Patent No. 6,064,564 (hereinafter Song). Consider claim 1, Xu teaches a modular mounting system for a keyboard comprising (Figure 1, elements 1, 7): a keyboard case (Figure 1, elements 1, 7), wherein the keyboard case comprises a plurality of connection points disposed on a perimeter of the keyboard case (Figure 10, elements 21); a plurality of gasket modules (Figure 2, element 2), wherein each of the plurality of gasket modules comprises at least a top portion and a bottom portion (Figure 2, element 2 comprises a plurality of portions including a top and bottom portion) and is configured to removably connect to one or more of the connection points ([0037], long flexible strip 2 and groove 21); and a switch plate (Figure 2, element 3), wherein the switch plate is configured to rest on the plurality of gasket modules ([0034] and figure 2, the long flexible strip 2 is mounted on all sides of the key locking plate 3). Xu does not appear to specifically disclose the switch plate is configured to rest on a top surface of each of the plurality of gasket modules such that the plurality of gasket modules support an underside of the switch plate. However, in a related field of endeavor, Song teaches a removed keyboard assembly (abstract) and further teaches the switch plate (Figure 2, 70) is configured to rest on a top surface of each of the plurality of gasket modules such that the plurality of gasket modules support an underside of the switch plate (Figure 2 and figure 4, 90). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to support an underside as shown in Song’s figure 2 with the benefit that support structure 68 is then removably retained in the recess 30 as suggested in column 4, lines 7-12. Consider claim 2, Xu and Song teach all the limitations of claim 1. In addition, Xu teaches wherein each of the plurality of connection points comprises at least one opening (Figure 10, elements 21), and wherein the bottom portion of each of the plurality of gasket modules comprises at least one protrusion (Figure 10, elements 2). Consider claim 3, Xu and Song teach all the limitations of claim 1. Xu does not appear to specifically disclose wherein each of the plurality of connection points comprises at least one protrusion, and wherein the bottom portion of each of the plurality of gasket modules comprises at least one opening. However, in a related field of endeavor, Song teaches a removed keyboard assembly (abstract) and further teaches wherein each of the plurality of connection points comprises at least one protrusion (Figure 2, 88), and wherein the bottom portion of each of the plurality of gasket modules comprises at least one opening (Figure 2, 90). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide protrusions and opening as shown in Song’s figure 2 with the benefit that support structure 68 is then removably retained in the recess 30 as suggested in column 4, lines 7-12. Consider claim 5, Xu and Song teach all the limitations of claim 1. Xu does not appear to specifically disclose a plurality of switch plate locators, wherein each of the plurality of switch plate locators is configured to removably connect to one or more of the connection points. However, Song teaches a plurality of switch plate locators (Figure 2, element 90), wherein each of the plurality of switch plate locators is configured to removably connect to one or more of the connection points (Figure 2, elements 90, 42, 88). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide locators as shown in Song’s figure 2 with the benefit that support structure 68 is then removably retained in the recess 30 as suggested in column 4, lines 7-12. Consider claim 6, Xu and Song teach all the limitations of claim 5. In addition, Song teaches wherein the switch plate comprises a plurality of anchor locations (Figure 2, elements 90), and each of the plurality of anchor locations is configured to fit around one of the plurality of switch plate locators (Figure 2, elements 90 and 70, see motivation to combine in claim 5). Consider claim 7, Xu and Song teach all the limitations of claim 1. In addition, Xu teaches wherein the number of connection points is greater than the number of gasket modules (Figure 10, number of connection points 21-22, strip 2) that can be used at any one time (since the long flexible strip 2 is inserted into the holddown groove 21 as suggested in [0037]). Consider claim 8, Xu and Song teach all the limitations of claim 1. In addition, Xu teaches wherein each of the plurality of gasket modules can be connected, disconnected, and reused a plurality of times ([0037], the long flexible strip 2 is inserted into the holddown groove. In addition, figure 10 shows disconnected and figure 1 shows connected). Consider claim 9, Xu and Song teach all the limitations of claim 1. In addition, Xu teaches wherein an amount of vertical travel of the switch plate increases when one or more of the plurality of gasket modules are removed from the modular mounting system ([0034], The long flexible strip 2 is mounted on all sides of the key locking plate 3. [0037], the long flexible strip 2 is inserted into the holddown groove 21 to effectively prevent the long flexible strips from moving to achieve a good effect of isolation and vibration reduction. Thus, when strip 2 is removed, modules can move (vertical travel), and when strip 2 is inserted, modules can achieve a good effect of isolation and vibration reduction (vertical travel)), and wherein the amount of vertical travel of the switch plate decreases when one or more of the plurality of gasket modules are added to the modular mounting system ([0034], The long flexible strip 2 is mounted on all sides of the key locking plate 3. [0037], the long flexible strip 2 is inserted into the holddown groove 21 to effectively prevent the long flexible strips from moving to achieve a good effect of isolation and vibration reduction. Thus, when strip 2 is removed, modules can move (vertical travel), and when strip 2 is inserted, modules can achieve a good effect of isolation and vibration reduction (vertical travel)). Consider claim 11, Xu teaches a method for mounting a switch plate in a keyboard, comprising (Figure 1, elements 1, 7): connecting a plurality of gasket modules to a keyboard case (Figures 1, 2, 10 and [0037], elements 2 and 21), wherein the keyboard case comprises a plurality of connection points (Figure 10, elements 21), and wherein each of the plurality of gasket modules comprises at least a top portion and a bottom portion (Figure 2, element 2 comprises a plurality of portions including a top and bottom portion) and is configured to removably connect to one or more of the plurality of connection points ([0037], long flexible strip 2 and groove 21); and mounting the switch plate to the keyboard case (Figure 2, element 3), wherein the switch plate rests on the portion of each of the plurality of gasket modules ([0034] and figure 2, the long flexible strip 2 is mounted on all sides of the key locking plate 3). Xu does not appear to specifically disclose the switch plate rests on a top surface of the top portion of each of the plurality of gasket modules such that the plurality of modules support an underside of the switching plate. However, in a related field of endeavor, Song teaches a removed keyboard assembly (abstract) and further teaches the switch plate (Figure 2, 70) rests on a top surface of the top portion of each of the plurality of gasket modules such that the plurality of modules support an underside of the switching plate (Figure 2 and figure 4, 90). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to support an underside as shown in Song’s figure 2 with the benefit that support structure 68 is then removably retained in the recess 30 as suggested in column 4, lines 7-12. Consider claim 12, it includes the limitations of claim 2 and thus it is rejected by the same reasoning. Consider claim 13, it includes the limitations of claim 3 and thus it is rejected by the same reasoning. Consider claim 15, it includes the limitations of claim 5 and thus it is rejected by the same reasoning. Consider claim 16, it includes the limitations of claim 6 and thus it is rejected by the same reasoning. Consider claim 17, it includes the limitations of claim 7 and thus it is rejected by the same reasoning. Consider claim 18, it includes the limitations of claim 8 and thus it is rejected by the same reasoning. Consider claim 19, it includes the limitations of claim 9 and thus it is rejected by the same reasoning. Claim(s) 4 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xu and Song as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Wang et al. U.S. Patent Publication No. 2020/0090885 (hereinafter Wang). Consider claim 4, Xu and Song teach all the limitations of claim 1. In addition, Xu teaches long flexible strip 2 in figure 2. Xu does not appear to specifically disclose wherein the top portion of each of the plurality of gasket modules is constructed from foam and the bottom portion is constructed from one of rubber or plastic. However, in a related field of endeavor, Wang teaches keyboards (abstract) and further teaches wherein the top portion of each of the plurality of gasket modules is constructed from foam (Figure 26 and [0120], 2610) and the bottom portion is constructed from one of rubber or plastic (Figure 26, element 310. [0073], 310 can be a rigid structure. [0062], rigid material such as hard plastic). Therefore, it would have obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide elements 2610 and 310 as taught by Wang with the benefit in a neutral position, the resilient supports 2610 can support the underside of the flexible layer 2602 and hold the flexible layer 2602 at a position spaced away from the web structure 310. When contacted by a user, the resilient supports 2610 can compress downward toward the web structure 310 while remaining in contact with the bottom surface of the flexible layer 2602 during the motion as suggested in [0120]. Consider claim 14, it includes the limitations of claim 4 and thus it is rejected by the same reasoning. Claim(s) 10 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xu and Song as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Weng et al. U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0190239 (hereinafter Weng). Consider claim 10, Xu and Song teach all the limitations of claim 1. Xu does not appear to specifically disclose wherein the plurality of connection points comprise a magnetic or ferrous material, and wherein the bottom portion of each of the plurality of gasket modules comprises a magnetic or ferrous material. However, in a related field of endeavor, Weng teaches a detachable keyboard (abstract) and further teaches wherein the plurality of connection points comprise a magnetic or ferrous material (Figure 1, magnetics 34, 16), and wherein the bottom portion of each of the plurality of gasket modules comprises a magnetic or ferrous material (Figure 1, magnetics 32 and 26). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide magnetic connections as taught by Weng with the benefit the assembly and disassembly of the keyboard and main body are achieved by means of a magnetic switch, wherein the magnetic switch is conditional on the magnetic force (attractive or repellent) as suggested in [0022]. Consider claim 20, it includes the limitations of claim 10 and thus it is rejected by the same reasoning. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 06/17/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. On pages 5-7, Applicant argues that “Xu does not disclose the amended limitations.” The Office respectfully disagrees for the following reasons. As detailed above, Song disclosed the amended limitations. On page 8, Applicant argues that “none of Song, Wang, nor Weng cures the above noted deficiencies of Xiu.” The Office respectfully disagrees for the following reasons. As detailed above, Song disclosed the amended limitations. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERTO W FLORES whose telephone number is (571)272-5512. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7am-4pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, AMR A AWAD can be reached at (571)272-7764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERTO W FLORES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 17, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12693729
METHOD FOR CONFIGURING VIRTUAL INPUT INTERFACE, HOST, AND COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12682842
SEMICONDUCTOR APPARATUS, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669887
DECODING TOUCH DATA BASED ON A CODE WORD PORTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12657961
Fingerprint Enrollment Using Collocation of a User's Touch and a Fingerprint Sensor
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12633259
PIXEL CIRCUIT AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
63%
With Interview (+13.6%)
3y 0m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 543 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month