Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/441,828

EDIBLE BEAN LINE <16400> (RUSTLER)

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Feb 14, 2024
Priority
Feb 14, 2023 — provisional 63/484,930
Examiner
KEOGH, MATTHEW R
Art Unit
1663
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Adm Edible Bean Specialties Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
548 granted / 697 resolved
+18.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
724
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§102
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§112
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 697 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status Claims 1-15 are pending and examined on the merits. Claims 1, 7, 13, and 15 are currently amended. Response to Arguments - Specification Applicant's amendments filed 23 February 2026 have overcome the objection of record. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Response to Arguments - Indefiniteness Applicant's amendments filed 23 February 2026 have overcome the rejection of record. Response to Arguments - Lack of Written Description Applicant's amendments filed 23 February 2026 have overcome the rejection of record. Response to Arguments - Deposit Rejection Applicant's arguments filed 23 February 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. To reiterate, the deposit was not made at a Budapest Treaty-approved depository. The two Budapest Treaty-approved depositories in the US that accept seed deposits are ATCC and NCMA. See screenshot below. PNG media_image1.png 882 1236 media_image1.png Greyscale Deposit Rejection The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. Claims 1-15 remain rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claims contain subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. Since the seed and/or plant claimed is essential to the claimed invention, it must be obtainable by a reproducible method set forth in the specification or otherwise be readily available to the public. If a seed, or seed of the claimed plant is not so obtainable or available, a deposit thereof may satisfy the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112. The specification does not disclose a reproducible process to obtain the exact same seed in each occurrence and it is not apparent if such a seed is readily available to the public. If the deposit of the seed is made under the terms of the Budapest Treaty, then an affidavit or declaration by the Applicant, or a statement by an attorney of record over his or her signature and registration number, stating the seed have been deposited under the Budapest Treaty and that the seed will be irrevocably, and without restriction or condition, released to the public upon the issuance of a patent would satisfy the deposit requirement made herein. A minimum deposit of 625 seeds is considered sufficient in the ordinary case to assure availability through the period for which a deposit must be maintained. If the deposit has not been made under the Budapest Treaty, then in order to certify that the deposit meets the criteria set forth in 37 CFR 1.801-1.809, Applicant may provide assurance of compliance by an affidavit or declaration, or by a statement by an attorney of record over his or her signature and registration number showing that (a) during the pendency of the application, access to the invention will be afforded to the Commissioner upon request; (b) all restrictions upon availability to the public will be irrevocably removed upon granting of the patent; (c) the deposit will be maintained in a public depository for a period of 30 years or 5 years after the last request or for the enforceable life of the patent, whichever is longer; (d) the viability of the biological material at the time of deposit will be tested (see 37 CFR 1.807); and (e) the deposit will be replaced if it should ever become unviable. Applicant has NOT indicated that Applicant intends to deposit the seeds at the approved depository in accordance with 37 CFR 1.801-1.809. Accordingly, Applicant needs to provide a signed statement indicating compliance with 37 CFR 1.801-1.809 indicating that all restrictions will be irrevocably be removed upon issuance of a patent, the approved depository Accession No. and evidence of deposit to overcome this rejection. Moreover, it is noted that the National Center for Genetic Resources Preservation in Fort Collins, CO (referenced in paragraph 0026) is not a Budapest Treaty approved depository. Conclusion No claims are allowed. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW R KEOGH whose telephone number is (571)272-2960. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7-4:30, half day on Fridays. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amjad Abraham can be reached on 571-270-7058. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW R KEOGH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1663
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 23, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635651
SOYBEAN CULTIVAR 27301119
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12628763
INBRED CORN LINE CB121
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12616133
PLANTS AND SEEDS OF HYBRID CORN VARIETY CH010493
2y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612668
SNP MARKERS AND SELECTION OF LOW FIBER IN BRASSICA
4y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12610916
SOYBEAN CULTIVAR 29440802
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 7m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 697 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month