Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 13, 2026
Application No. 18/441,855

DYNAMIC CONFIGURATION OF RANDOM ACCESS COMMUNICATIONS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 14, 2024
Examiner
PEREZ GUTIERREZ, RAFAEL
Art Unit
2642
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
20%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
27%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 20% of cases
20%
Career Allowance Rate
38 granted / 186 resolved
-41.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
247
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
60.6%
+20.6% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 186 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 8, 12-14 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Nimbalker (WO 2023211348 A1). Regarding claims 1 and 20, Nimbalker discloses an apparatus configured for wireless communications, comprising: one or more memories; and one or more processors coupled to the one or more memories, the one or more processors (page 15-16 “The hardware 80 of the wireless device 22……processor….memory….software 80 which is stored in”) being configured to cause the apparatus to: obtain, via a first type of signaling, a configuration that indicates at least a first set of parameters for random access communications (page 1 “NR supports……initial access…….SSB periodically”, fig. 17 elements S172-S174, page 29 “An example rocedure is shown in FIG. 17…..SSB……a first set of RACH resources”, page 30 “Configuration of the first…set of resources…….PRACH occasions, time-domain PRACH occasions….may also be included in the configuration”); obtain, via one or more of a second type of signaling (fig. 17 elements S176-S178, page 29 “An example procedure is shown in FIG. 17……..a second set of RACH resources and an associated availability …….with an SI-RNTI Block S176”); or a payload (consideration is optional) scheduled by the second type of signaling, an indication of a modification to the configuration, wherein the modification is based on a second set of parameters that are indicated via one or more of: the configuration, the second type of signaling (page 31 “The indicated availability for a second set of resources may be……duration…..a number of slots…..Example A1…….PDSCH…..a paging-related message…..SI-RNTI), or the payload, and wherein the first type of signaling is different from the second type of signaling; and communicate, with a network entity, via a random access channel, based at least in part on the modification to the configuration (page 32 “Example C1……..and determine one of the first set and the second set to use for random access…..in part on the indication”). Regarding claims 2 and 14, Nimbalker discloses the first set of parameters indicates a first periodicity for a set of random access occasions (ROs) (page 3 “The master information…..80 ms and repetitions made within that periodicity…..160 ms and variable transmission repetion periodicity within that periodicity”); the second set of parameters indicates a second periodicity for the set of ROs; and the second periodicity is different in duration than the first periodicity (page 31 “In another example……DCI………every 40ms…..every 20ms”. Regarding claim 8, Nimbalker discloses to communicate via the random access channel, the one or more processors are configured to cause the apparatus to send a message in a random access occasion (RO) associated with a synchronization signal block (SSB), wherein the first set of parameters indicate a mapping that indicates the RO is associated with the SSB (page 31 “In another example, the monitoring occasions for monitoring the DCI….every 40ms…..every 20ms”). Regarding claim 12, Nimbalker discloses the first type of signaling comprises system information (page 3 “NR supports……The master information block….includes parameters SIB1 from the cell”). Regarding claim 13, Nimbalker an apparatus configured for wireless communications, comprising: one or more memories; and one or more processors coupled to the one or more memories (page 15 “In the embodiment shown, the hardware 58……processor 70 and memory 72……EPROM”). send, via a first type of signaling, a configuration that indicates at least a first set of parameters for random access communications (page 1 “NR supports……initial access…….SSB periodically”, fig. 17 elements S172-S174, page 29 “An example procedure is shown in FIG. 17…..SSB……a first set of RACH resources”, page 33 “Configuration of the first…set of resources…….PRACH occasions, time-domain PRACH occasions….may also be included in the configuration”); send, via one or more of a second type of signaling (fig. 17 elements S176-S178, page 29 “An example procedure is shown in FIG. 17……..a second set of RACH resources and an associated availability …….with an SI-RNTI Block S176”); or a payload (consideration is optional) scheduled by the second type of signaling, an indication of a modification to the configuration, wherein the modification is based on a second set of parameters that are indicated via one or more of: the configuration, the second type of signaling (page 33 “The indicated availability for a second set of resources may be……duration…..a number of slots…..Example A1…….PDSCH…..a paging-related message…..SI-RNTI), or the payload, and wherein the first type of signaling is different from the second type of signaling; and communicate, with a network entity, via a random access channel, based at least in part on the modification to the configuration (page 34 “Example C1……..and determine one of the first set and the second set to use for random access…..in part on the indication”). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-7, 9-11 and 15-19 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Examiner Tu Nguyen whose telephone number is (571)272-7883. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-5PM Eastern Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor Rafael Perez-Gutierrez can be reached on 571-272-7915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300 or mailed to: Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TU X NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2024
Application Filed
May 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 05, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672095
DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665661
SYNCHRONIZATION OF UPLINK TRANSMISSION FROM A USER EQUIPMENT (UE) IN A NON-TERRESTRIAL WIRELESS NETWORK (NTN)
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659696
COMMUNICATION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM ON PACKET DATA CONVERGENCE PROTOCOL (PDCP)
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659903
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659906
NON-ACCESS STRATUS (NAS) SIGNALING CONNECTION HANDLING FOR PUBLIC LAND MOBILE NETEWORK (PLMN) SELECTION
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
20%
Grant Probability
27%
With Interview (+6.8%)
3y 11m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 186 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month