Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/442,242

POWER DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 15, 2024
Priority
Feb 21, 2023 — JP 2023-024868
Examiner
WILLIAMS, ARUN C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1164 granted / 1419 resolved
+22.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1438
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
60.6%
+20.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§112
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1419 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This is a first action on the merits, in response to the claims received 2/15/2024. Claims 1-5 are pending for prosecution below. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS)(s) file on have been considered by the examiner. An initialed copy is attached herewith. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Najmabadi et al, (Najmabadi), (USPATNO.10,230,254). As for claim 1, Najmabadi discloses and shows in Figs.1,5-7 a power device comprising: a power storage unit (ref’s power source); a rotating electric machine (ref’s transformer) ; a charging (via charging port) and power supply unit connected to the rotating electric machine; a DC voltage conversion unit (via boost converter) connected to the power storage unit; a power conversion unit (ref’s AC/DC) connected between the DC voltage conversion unit and the rotating electric machine; and a power supply unit connected to the DC voltage conversion unit and the power conversion unit (col.5, lines 21-59). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 2-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Najmabadi in view of CHOI et al, (CHOI), (USNO.2014/0021780) As for claim 2, Najmabadi discloses all limitations, but differs from the claimed invention because he does not explicitly disclose a power storage unit is charged from the charging and power supply unit by an external power source, the rotating electric machine and the power conversion unit perform a voltage step-up operation, and the DC voltage conversion unit performs a voltage step-down operation Choi discloses and shows in Fig. 2 a power storage unit is charged from the charging and power supply unit by an external power source, the rotating electric machine and the power conversion unit perform a voltage step-up operation (via operation mode), and the DC voltage conversion unit performs a voltage step-down operation (via buck converter in inverse operation mode) (par.[0042,0053]) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention modified the teachings of Najmabadi by using a power storage unit is charged from the charging and power supply unit by an external power source, the rotating electric machine and the power conversion unit perform a voltage step-up operation, and the DC voltage conversion unit performs a voltage step-down operation for advantages such as providing energy in an emergency (par.[0003]) , as taught by Choi As for claim 3, Najmabadi in combination with Choi discloses and shows a case where the power storage unit is charged from the charging and power supply unit by an external power source, the power supply unit steps down a voltage obtained through the voltage step-up operation of the rotating electric machine and the power conversion unit and supplies power to the outside. As for claim 4, Najmabadi in combination with Choi discloses and shows a case where power is supplied to the outside from the charging and power supply unit with power of the power storage unit, the rotating electric machine, the power conversion unit, and the DC voltage conversion unit perform a voltage step-down operation. As for claim 5, Najmabadi in combination with Choi discloses and shows in Fig. 2 a case where power is supplied to the outside from the charging and power supply unit with power of the power storage unit, the power supply unit steps down a voltage obtained through the voltage step-down operation of the DC voltage conversion unit and supplies power to the outside. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARUN C WILLIAMS whose telephone number is (571)272-9765. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9 a.m. - 6 p.m.. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julian Huffman can be reached on 571-272-2147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ARUN C WILLIAMS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 15, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749921
WIRELESS POWER TRANSMITTING APPARATUS AND CHARGING STATE DISPLAY METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE USING SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749911
BATTERY CHARGING METHOD AND SYSTEM BASED ON LITHIUM PLATING DETECTION, AND AUTOMOBILE AND MEDIUM
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741845
WIRELESS POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744263
Cell Phone Heat Protector Device
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734929
Server
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+16.4%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1419 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month