Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/443,235

ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC PHOTORECEPTOR, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 15, 2024
Priority
Jun 12, 2023 — JP 2023-096630
Examiner
SEILER, GRANT STEVEN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
30%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
15 granted / 26 resolved
-2.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -28% lift
Without
With
+-27.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
65
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
94.8%
+54.8% vs TC avg
§102
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 26 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1 - 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshizawa (US PGP 2019/0219938). Yoshizawa teaches an electrophotographic photoreceptor comprising a photosensitive layer and a conductive support, wherein the photosensitive layer contains a polyester resin (Abstract). The photosensitive layer may be disposed on the conductive support ([0201]). The photosensitive layer may be a single-layer type photosensitive layer, or a laminate type photosensitive layer having a charge generation layer and a charge transport layer ([0221]). The binder resin of the charge transport layer is preferably a polyester resin described by Yoshizawa ([0237]). Yoshizawa’s polyester resin contains at least one structure that may be represented by a Formula (2) ([0017]), and further contains a divalent phenol residue and a divalent carboxylic acid residue ([0018]). The divalent carboxylic acid residue of the polyester may contain a structure represented by a Formula (7) ([0026]), which may be the same ([0027]) as instant units of formulae (1-A3) or (1-A4) (Specification, [0064]), and reading on the structure of instant Formula (1) of Claim 1. Yoshizawa teaches that the amount of carboxylic acid chloride group present in the polyester resin is preferably 0.05 µeq/g (micro-equivalents per gram) or less ([0157]). This equates to a value of 5 x 10-8 µmol/g of carboxylic acid chloride in the polyester resin. Where the polyester resin does not make up the entirety of the charge transport layer, that content of acid chloride groups would necessarily satisfy the inequality stated in Claim 1 and Claim 2. Yoshizawa’s dicarboxylic acid residues according to Formula (7) read on instant Formula (2) of Claim 3. Yoshizawa teaches the use of divalent acid chlorides ([0050]), [0180], [0181] – [0184]), satisfying Claim 4. Yoshizawa teaches that the binder resin of the photoreceptor may contain another resin other than the polyester resin already discussed, which may preferably be a polycarbonate resin ([0164]), satisfying Claim 5. As discussed above, Yoshizawa teaches dicarboxylic acid units of a Formula (7), which may be the same as instant units of formulae (1-A3) and (1-A4), reading on formula (1-A) of Claim 6. Yoshizawa’s dicarboxylic acid unit of Formula (7) may be the same ([0027]) as the instant unit of formula (A3-2), reading on formula (A3) of Claim 7. Yoshizawa teaches that the divalent phenol residue of the polyester may contain a structure represented by a Formula (6) ([0024]), which may be the same ([0025]) as at least instant units of formulae (B6-3) and (B6-4) (Specification, [0143]), and reading on the structure of instant Formula (B6) of Claim 8. As discussed above, the photosensitive layer of Yoshizawa may be a single-layer type photosensitive layer ([0221]), satisfying Claim 9. As discussed above, Yoshizawa teaches that the amount of carboxylic acid chloride group present in the polyester resin is preferably 0.05 µeq/g (micro-equivalents per gram) or less ([0157]). This equates to a value of 5 x 10-8 µmol/g of carboxylic acid chloride in the polyester resin. Where the polyester resin does not make up the entirety of the photosensitive layer, that content of acid chloride groups would necessarily satisfy the inequality stated in Claim 10. Yoshizawa’s dicarboxylic acid residues according to Formula (7) read on instant Formula (2) of Claim 11. Yoshizawa teaches the use of divalent acid chlorides ([0050]), [0180], [0181] – [0184]), satisfying Claim 12. Yoshizawa teaches that the binder resin of the photoreceptor may contain another resin other than the polyester resin already discussed, which may preferably be a polycarbonate resin ([0164]), satisfying Claim 13. As discussed above, Yoshizawa teaches dicarboxylic acid units of a Formula (7), which may be the same as instant units of formulae (1-A3) and (1-A4), reading on formula (1-A) of Claim 14. Yoshizawa’s dicarboxylic acid unit of Formula (7) may be the same ([0027]) as the instant unit of formula (A3-2), reading on formula (A3) of Claim 15. Yoshizawa teaches that the divalent phenol residue of the polyester may contain a structure represented by a Formula (6) ([0024]), which may be the same ([0025]) as at least instant units of formulae (B6-3) and (B6-4) (Specification, [0143]), and reading on the structure of instant Formula (B6) of Claim 16. Yoshizawa teaches an electrophotographic photoreceptor cartridge, analogous to a process cartridge, which incorporates the photoreceptor described above and which is mounted on and demounted from the main body of an electrophotographic apparatus ([0269], [0270]), reading on Claim 17, Claim 18, and Claim 19. Yoshizawa describes an image forming apparatus comprising the photoreceptor described above, a charging device, an exposing device (analogous to an electrostatic latent image forming device), a developing device, and a transfer device ([0265] – [0267]), reading on Claim 20. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Grant S Seiler whose telephone number is (571)272-3015. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30 - 5:30 Pacific. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GRANT STEVEN SEILER/Examiner, Art Unit 1734 /PETER L VAJDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 07/02/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 15, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12663734
TONER
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656700
Toner, Toner Cartridge, and Image-Forming Device
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12645162
TONER
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12631980
YELLOW TONER
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12607950
TONER
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
30%
With Interview (-27.5%)
3y 4m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 26 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month