Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/443,356

RADIO-FREQUENCY MODULE AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 16, 2024
Examiner
AYOTUNDE, AYODEJI O
Art Unit
2649
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
588 granted / 710 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
735
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§103
63.7%
+23.7% vs TC avg
§102
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 710 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Horita et al., US2021/0135693 A1, and further in view of Shinozaki et al., US2021/0091807 A1. Regarding claim 1, Horita teaches A radio-frequency module (Fig. 2 item 1; Radio frequency module 1) comprising: a module substrate including a first major surface and a second major surface, the second major surface being opposite to the first major surface (par. 0043; mounting board 5 includes first principal surface 51 and second principal surface 52. First principal surface 51 and second principal surface 52 are on opposite sides of mounting board 5 in thickness direction D1 of mounting board 5.); a first acoustic wave filter disposed at the module substrate (Fig. 8, par. 0116; the transceiving filter 33 (i.e., first acoustic wave filter) located at the RF module.); a duplexer disposed at the module substrate (Fig. 3, par. 0026; the RF module 1 having a duplexer (i.e., transmission filter 31 and reception filter 32).), the duplexer including a second acoustic wave filter and a third acoustic wave filter (par. 0151; the transmission filter 31 is a SAW filter (i.e., second acoustic wave filter) and the reception filter 32 is also a SAW filter (i.e., third acoustic wave filter).); an antenna switch configured to selectively couple the first acoustic wave filter or the duplexer (Fig. 8, par. 0116; the first switch 91 (i.e., antenna switch) selectively couples the transceiving filter 33 (i.e., first acoustic wave filter) or the duplexer (i.e., filters 31A 32A or 31B 32B)); and a transmit switch configured to selectively couple the first acoustic wave filter or the second acoustic wave filter (Fig. 8, par. 0120; clearly shows the switch 94 (i.e., transmit switch) selectively couple to the transceiving filter 33 (i.e., first acoustic wave filter) or transmission filter 31B (i.e., second acoustic wave filter).), wherein the first acoustic wave filter includes a pass band that includes an uplink operating band of a first band for frequency division duplex (FDD) (par. 0030; The transmission signals and the reception signals are, for example, frequency division duplex (FDD) signals. FDD is a wireless communication technique in which transmission and reception in wireless communication are assigned with different frequency bands, and transmission and reception are performed.), the second acoustic wave filter includes a pass band that includes the uplink operating band of the first band (par. 0030; The transmission signals and the reception signals are, for example, frequency division duplex (FDD) signals. FDD is a wireless communication technique in which transmission and reception in wireless communication are assigned with different frequency bands, and transmission and reception are performed.), the third acoustic wave filter includes a pass band that includes a downlink operating band of the first band (par. 0030; TDD is a wireless communication technique in which transmission and reception in wireless communication are assigned with the same frequency band, and transmission and reception are switched based on time slots.). Horita fails to teach the following recited limitation. However, Shinozaki teaches the first acoustic wave filter and the third acoustic wave filter are stacked together and positioned beside the first major surface (Fig. 2B, par. 0078; shows duplexers 61 to 64 (i.e., first acoustic wave filter and third acoustic wave filter) being disposed on the principal surface 91a (i.e., the duplexers 61 to 64 contains both a transmit and receive filters).). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine Horita’s teachings with Shinozaki’s teachings in order to provide a radio frequency module that suppresses deterioration of reception sensitivity (Shinozaki, par. 0006). Regarding claim 2, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches further comprising: a power amplifier coupled to the first acoustic wave filter and the second acoustic wave filter via the transmit switch (par. 0032). Regarding claim 3, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 2. Horita further teaches wherein in plan view of the first major surface, a distance between the power amplifier and the first acoustic wave filter is longer than a distance between the power amplifier and the second acoustic wave filter (par. 0059). Regarding claim 4, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches further comprising: a resin member that covers the first acoustic wave filter, the third acoustic wave filter, and the first major surface (par. 0041); and a shielding film that covers a surface of the resin member, wherein the first acoustic wave filter is in contact with the shielding film (par. 0041). Regarding claim 5, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 4. Horita further teaches wherein the third acoustic wave filter is positioned between the module substrate and the first acoustic wave filter, and the first acoustic wave filter includes a surface and another surface that is opposite to the surface and that faces the third acoustic wave filter, and the surface of the first acoustic wave filter is in contact with the shielding film (par. 0056). Regarding claim 6, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 2. Horita further teaches wherein the transmit switch includes a first common terminal coupled to an output end of the power amplifier, a first selection terminal coupled to an input end of the first acoustic wave filter, and a second selection terminal coupled to an input end of the second acoustic wave filter, the antenna switch includes a second common terminal coupled to an antenna, a third selection terminal coupled to an output end of the first acoustic wave filter, and a fourth selection terminal coupled to an output end of the second acoustic wave filter and an input end of the third acoustic wave filter, and in a case that the first common terminal is connected to the first selection terminal, the second common terminal is connected to the third selection terminal and not to the fourth selection terminal (Fig. 9). Regarding claim 7, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 6. Horita further teaches wherein, in a case that the first common terminal is connected to the second selection terminal, the second common terminal is connected to the fourth selection terminal and not to the third selection terminal (Fig. 9). Regarding claim 8, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches wherein the first acoustic wave filter corresponds to Power Class 2 (par. 0048) and the second acoustic wave filter corresponds to Power Class 3 (par. 0049). Regarding claim 9, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches wherein an electric power handling capability of the first acoustic wave filter is higher than an electric power handling capability of the second acoustic wave filter (par. 0067). Regarding claim 10, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches wherein a size of the first acoustic wave filter is larger than a size of the second acoustic wave filter (par. 0024). Regarding claim 11, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches wherein the third acoustic wave filter is positioned between the module substrate and the first acoustic wave filter, and the third acoustic wave filter is smaller than the first acoustic wave filter in plan view of the first major surface (par. 0059). Regarding claim 12, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches further comprising: a low-noise amplifier coupled to the third acoustic wave filter (par. 0035). Regarding claim 13, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches wherein the second acoustic wave filter is disposed at the first major surface, and the antenna switch and the transmit switch are disposed at the second major surface (par. 0142). Regarding claim 14, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches wherein the second acoustic wave filter, the antenna switch, and the transmit switch are disposed at the first major surface (par. 0142). Regarding claim 15, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches wherein the module substrate includes a low temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) substrate (par. 0098). Regarding claim 16, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches wherein the module substrate includes a high temperature co-fired ceramic (HTCC) substrate (par. 0098). Regarding claim 17, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches wherein the module substrate includes a redistribution layer (par. 0064). Regarding claim 18, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches wherein at least one of the first, second, and third acoustic wave filters include a surface acoustic wave (SAW) filter (par. 0151). Regarding claim 19, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches wherein at least one of the first, second, and third acoustic wave filters includes a bulk acoustic wave (BAW) filter (par. 0151). Regarding claim 20, Horita and Shinozaki teach all the limitations in claim 1. Horita further teaches A communication device (Fig. 8 item 8c; communication device 8c) comprising: the radio-frequency module according to Claim 1 (Fig. 8 item 1c; radio frequency module 1c); and a signal processing circuit configured to process a radio-frequency signal transferred or to be transferred through the radio-frequency module (par. 0083; Signal processing circuit 82 includes RF signal processing circuit 83 and baseband signal processing circuit 84. Signal processing circuit 82 processes transmission signals and reception signals.). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AYODEJI O AYOTUNDE whose telephone number is (571)270-7983. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 7:00am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yuwen Pan can be reached at 571-272-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AYODEJI O AYOTUNDE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2649
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 10, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 25, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 25, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 01, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598011
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TESTING DYNAMIC BEAM ADAPTIVE RADIO RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (RRM) AND DEMODULATION REQUIREMENTS IN OVER THE AIR (OTA) TEST SETUP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596188
POSITIONING METHOD USING MULTIPLE DEVICES AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597987
REPEATER SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE REPEATER SYSTEM FOR HIGH-PERFORMANCE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587218
Wireless Receiver Circuitry with Local Feedback Protection
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574859
SOUNDING REFERENCE SIGNAL TRIGGERING TECHNIQUES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 710 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month