Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/444,141

Early Timing Advance Acquisition for Handover

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 16, 2024
Priority
Feb 16, 2023 — provisional 63/446,289
Examiner
TROST IV, WILLIAM GEORGE
Art Unit
2641
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Comcast Cable Communications LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
60%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
29 granted / 40 resolved
+10.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -12% lift
Without
With
+-12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
70
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§103
59.4%
+19.4% vs TC avg
§102
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 40 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 5/18/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Guo is not prior art because para 1 refers to the provisional application 63/389,621 being filed on July 15, 2023 which is not prior art. However, the cover page of Guo states that the provisional was in fact filed on July 15, 2022, which is prior art for the instant application. Furthermore, Guo also claims foreign priority to PCT/CN2022/106201 which was filed on Jul 18,2022 which is prior art for the instant applications. The rejection of Guo and MolvanJazi still applies. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Guo (2023/0388871) in view of MolavianJazi (2022/021844). Regarding claim 1, Guo discloses a method comprising receiving by a base station via a first cell, a first message comprising one or measurements of a wireless device, that are associated with reference signals of a second cell (figure 36, measurement report#1). Guo discloses a second message to send to the second cell for a L1/L2 triggered mobility procedure (Early sync or DL/UL Sync #4) and receiving a third message based on the second message and indicating PRACH resources (Cell switch command 6, Figure 36). Also see, abstract, para 427-429 and 452). Guo does not disclose the use of one or more preamble repetitions. However, MolavianJazi teaches in an analogous art, a handover procedure in which multiple preambles can be sent from the UE to the target cell (para 543-546). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include repetition to increase the robustness of the handover process. Regarding claims 2-3, Guo further discloses receiving a fourth message based on the second message indicating PRACH resources (Figure 36, Rach step 7), and the first cell is the serving cell and the second cell comprises a candidate target base station distributed unit (Figure 1, S-Cell130s and T-Cell 130t). Regarding claim 5, 8-9, Guo further disclose the first message is an uplink control information (para 112, layer 1 measurements done by the UE which are sent to the SCell, hence uplink signaling, also para 428), the LTM procedure comprises early timing advance (para 429- to send to the second cell as well as para 452, multiple preamble resources are used by the UE). Guo discloses the second message comprises a configuration parameter indicating a number of times for preamble repetition (para 452, SSB/Mask Index to indicate 4 preamble transitions). Regarding claims 6-7, Guo discloses where the second message is a wireless device context modification required (early timing advance signaling is a context modification for the current connection between the serving cell and target cell, para 429, 433-434) and where the 3rd message is a wireless device context modification confirm message or a DL RRC message (Figure 24, Message 7 is related to cell switch command in Figure 36 and is a DL RRC message). Regarding claim 10, Guo disclose a method comprising: sending, by a base station via a second cell (Figure 35b, measurements are sent to target/second cell), a first message indicating: one or more measurements, of a wireless device, that are associated with reference signals of a first cell (Measurement report #1, Fig 36); receiving, from the second cell, a second message based on the first message and for the wireless device to send to the second cell for an early timing advance acquisition of a layer 1 or layer 2 triggered mobility (LTM) procedure (Early sync step #4, Figure 36); and sending, to the first cell, a third message indicating physical random access channel (PRACH) resources for the one or more preamble repetitions (Figure 36, command #6), Also see para 427-429 and 452. Guo does not disclose the use of one or more preamble repetitions. However, MolavianJazi teaches in an analogous art, a handover procedure in which multiple preambles can be sent from the UE to the target cell (para 543-546). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include repetition to increase the robustness of the handover process. Regarding claims 11-13, Guo further discloses receiving a fourth message based on the second message indicating PRACH resources , which are configuration parameters to connected in the LTM procedure (Figure 36, Rach step 7), and the first cell is the serving cell and the second cell comprises a candidate target base station (Figure 1, S-Cell130s and T-Cell 130t). Regarding claims 15-16, Guo further disclose the LTM procedure comprises early timing advance which is one or more measurement configurations (para 429- to send to the second cell as well as para 452, multiple preamble resources are used by the UE). Guo discloses the second message comprises a configuration parameter indicating a number of times for preamble repetition (para 452, SSB/Mask Index to indicate 4 preamble transitions). Regarding claim 17, Guo discloses a method comprising: sending, by a wireless device and to a first base station, a first message comprising one or more measurements of the wireless device that are associated with reference signals of a second base station (Figure 36, measurement report #1); and receiving, from the first base station, a second message comprising: an indication for the wireless device to send to the second base station for an early timing advance acquisition of a layer 1 or layer 2 triggered mobility (LTM) procedure; (Early sync or dl/ul sync #4 and an indication indicating physical random access channel (PRACH) resources for the one or more preamble repetitions (cell switch command #6). Also see para 427-429 and 452. Guo does not disclose the use of one or more preamble repetitions. However, MolavianJazi teaches in an analogous art, a handover procedure in which multiple preambles can be sent from the UE to the target cell (para 543-546). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include repetition to increase the robustness of the handover process. Regarding claims 18-20, Guo discloses the first base station is a serving base station of the LTM procedure (SCell 130s) and the second base station is a candidate target base station (TCell 130t) of the LTM procedure. Guo discloses where the second message is a wireless device context modification required message (early timing advance signaling is a context modification for the current connection between the serving cell and target cell, para 429, 433-434) and where the first message is an uplink control information (para 112, layer 1 measurements done by the UE which are sent to the SCell, hence uplink signaling, also para 428. Regarding claims 4 and 14, Guo the first cell is associated with a base station distributed unit (Figures 9-11, signals are received via the DU) and thee sending of the second message and the reception of the third message being processed by a base station central unit (Use of CU in signaling between source and target cell Figure 9). Regarding claim 21, Guo further discloses wherein the one or more preamble repetitions are for an early timing advance acquisition of the LTM procedure (abstract and para 428-429). Regarding claim 22, Guo discloses a base station (Figures 54 and 57, Network DU/Cells) comprising a processor and memory storing instructions (host platform 5528, para 801 as well as Figure 56 discussion, para 803-804) when executed by the one or more processors, cause the base station to: receive via a first cell, a first message comprising one or measurements of a wireless device, that are associated with reference signals of a second cell (figure 36, measurement report#1). Guo discloses sending a second message to the second cell for a L1/L2 triggered mobility procedure (Early sync or DL/UL Sync #4) and receive a third message based on the second message and indicating PRACH resources (Cell switch command 6, Figure 36). Also see, abstract, para 427-429 and 452). Guo does not disclose the use of one or more preamble repetitions. However, MolavianJazi teaches in an analogous art, a handover procedure in which multiple preambles can be sent from the UE to the target cell (para 543-546). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include repetition to increase the robustness of the handover process. Regarding claims 23-26, the claims disclose the same limitations as claims 3-4 and 8-9 and are rejected given the same reasoning as stated above. Regarding claim 27, Guo discloses a wireless device (UE, 5502, Figure 55) comprising one or more processors, and memory storing instructions that when executed by the one or more processors (host platform 5508, para 794 and Figure 56 discussion of para 803-804) configure the wireless device to: send, to a first base station, a first message comprising one or more measurements of the wireless device that are associated with reference signals of a second base station (Figure 36, measurement report #1); and receive, from the first base station, a second message comprising: an indication for the wireless device to send to the second base station for an early timing advance acquisition of a layer 1 or layer 2 triggered mobility (LTM) procedure; (Early sync or dl/ul sync #4 and an indication indicating physical random access channel (PRACH) resources for the one or more preamble repetitions (cell switch command #6). Also see para 427-429 and 452. Guo does not disclose the use of one or more preamble repetitions. However, MolavianJazi teaches in an analogous art, a handover procedure in which multiple preambles can be sent from the UE to the target cell (para 543-546). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include repetition to increase the robustness of the handover process. Regarding claims 28-30, the claims disclose the same limitations of claims 18-20 and are rejected for the same reasons as stated above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kim (2026/0101253) discloses a layer 1/layer 2 mobility identifier. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM GEORGE TROST IV whose telephone number is (571)272-7872. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7a-4p, Fridays 7a-2p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Appiah can be reached at 571-272-7904. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. WILLIAM GEORGE TROST IV Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 2641 /WILLIAM G TROST IV/ Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 16, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 18, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12695475
RECEIVER EQUALIZER CIRCUIT, TRANSMITTER EQUALIZER CIRCUIT, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12684313
MULTI-PATH LOCATION TRACKING AND NORMALIZATION
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683699
METHOD FOR MEASURING NOISE RMS OF PERIODIC SIGNAL AND SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO OF SINUSOIDAL SIGNAL
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677204
COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NETWORK EXPANSION VIA CONNECTIVITY NODES AND EVENT DETECTION BASED THEREFROM
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677254
TERMINAL, BASE STATION, AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
60%
With Interview (-12.0%)
2y 8m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 40 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month