Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/444,309

MECHANISM TO ALLEVIATE UNDERUTILIZED COMPUTING, SENSING, CONNECTIVITY, AND ENERGY CAPABILITIES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 16, 2024
Priority
Oct 13, 2023 — provisional 63/590,240
Examiner
CHEN, JUNPENG
Art Unit
2645
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
604 granted / 824 resolved
+11.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
848
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
74.0%
+34.0% vs TC avg
§102
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 824 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement submitted on 12/26/2025 has been considered by the Examiner and made of record in the application file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-4, 6-13 and 15-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chien (US 20160072804 A1). Consider claim 1, Chien discloses a first device for sharing device capabilities (read as first device 102 for sharing resources/capabilities, figure 1, par [0022] and [0018]-[0019]), the first device comprising: at least one memory; and at least one processor coupled to the at least one memory (read as the first device 102 includes a processor 104 and a memory 106, with memory 106 storing instructions executable by processor 104 to perform operations, figure 1, par [0019]) and configured to: output, for transmission to one or more second devices, an advertisement message indicating one or more capabilities of the first device available for sharing with the one or more second devices (read as the first device 102 transmitting resource advertisement message 140 to one or more devices, where the resource advertisement message 140 indicates the type of resource 116 and information associated with it, and where resource 116 includes sharable device functions and interfaces, figure 1, par [0022]-[0025]); receive, from at least one second device of the one or more second devices, a response message requesting at least one capability of the one or more capabilities from the first device (read as based on the received resource advertisement message 140, the second device 120 sends a request (corresponding to a response message) to use the resource 116 and the first device 102receives that request, figures 1 and 2, par [0025]-[0026]); and establish a connection with the at least one second device for sharing the at least one capability (read as after the first device 102 determines that the second device 120 is authenticated, the first device 102 connecting with the second device 120, at 214, to share the resource 116/capability using ad hoc connection, figures 1 and 2, par [0010], [0034] and [0041]). Consider claim 2, as applied to claim 1 above, Chien discloses wherein the one or more capabilities comprise at least one of a computing capability, a connectivity capability, a sensing capability, an energy capability, a distributed computing capability, a power capability, a battery capability, a memory capability, a storage capability, or a hardware capability (rad as sharing resources/capabilities including processing capabilities (read as the resource 116 may include data associated with a camera, a microphone, a satellite interface, a wireless interface, a cellular interface, or a combination thereof; when the resource 116 is associated with an external device, the resource 116 may include data received by the first device 102 from a multimedia capture device, a sensor array, a drone aircraft, or a combination thereof, figures 1 and 2, par [0010], [0022]-[0023] and [0041]). Consider claim 3, as applied to claim 1 above, Chien discloses wherein the advertisement message further indicates an exchange system for sharing the one or more capabilities (read as the resource advertisement message 140 including an offer price for sharing resource 116, and a sharing arrangement implemented through payment, credits, bids and counteroffers; for example, the second device 120 would accept that price or submit a bid price, and the resource 116 is shared in exchange for payment at that offer price, par [0012], [0025] and [0031]). Consider claim 4, as applied to claim 3 above, Chien discloses wherein the exchange system is one of a pre-grant exchange, a barter exchange, or a charge exchange (read as the message 140 includes an offer price, the second device 120 would accept that price or submit a bid price, and the resource 116 is shared in exchange for payment at that offer price, par [0012] and [0031]). Consider claim 6, as applied to claim 1 above, Chien discloses wherein the at least one processor is configured to form a respective device group association with each second device of the one or more second devices (read as processor 102 of first device 102 carries out sharing operations, including receiving response request 142 from second devices 120 and determining whether the second device 120 is known or authenticated, establishing an ad hoc connection and trust relationship for sharing, then sharing resource 116 with the second device 120, which corresponding to the processor 104 forming a respective device (sharing) group association with each of the second device 120 participating in the sharing operations, par [0010], [0011], [0019] and [0027]-[0028]). Consider claim 7, as applied to claim 6 above, Chien discloses wherein the device group association is one of a permanent association or an ad hoc association (read as the first device 102 forming the ad hoc connection with other devices such as second device 120 after authentication, par [0010], [0011], [0019] and [0027]-[0028]). Consider claim 8, as applied to claim 1 above, Chien discloses wherein the connection is established via one or more third devices (read as in one case which the first device 102 and second device 120 do not communicate directly, but instead communicate via arbitration server 420, which the arbitration server 420 forwarding data associated with resource between them, par [0014], [0053], [0056] and [0061]; alternative, fifth device 410 in figure 4 (par [0053]) would be read as the claimed “one or more third devices”). Consider claim 9, as applied to claim 8 above, Chien discloses wherein the at least one processor is configured to form a respective device group association with each third device of the one or more third devices (read as the processor of first device 402 (102 in figure 1) controls the operations of first device 402/102 and brings the first device 402/102 into a sharing relationship with second device 404 (120 in figure 1) by communicating with arbitration server 420, authenticating through arbitration server 420, and using arbitration server 420 for resource sharing operations, which corresponding to the processor being configured to form a respective (sharing) device group association each third device participating in the sharing operations, par [0014], [0053], [0055] and [0061]; alternatively, the processor of first device is forming respective (sharing) device group association with each fifth device 410, par [0053]). Consider claim 10, Chien discloses a method for sharing device capabilities (read as method of first device 102 for sharing resources/capabilities, figure 1, par [0022] and [0018]-[0019]), the method comprising: transmitting, by a first device to one or more second devices, an advertisement message indicating one or more capabilities of the first device available for sharing with the one or more second devices (read as the first device 102 transmitting resource advertisement message 140 to one or more devices, where the resource advertisement message 140 indicates the type of resource 116 and information associated with it, and where resource 116 includes sharable device functions and interfaces, figure 1, par [0022]-[0025]); receiving, by the first device from at least one second device of the one or more second devices, a response message requesting at least one capability of the one or more capabilities from the first device (corresponding to a response message) to use the resource 116 and the first device 102receives that request, figures 1 and 2, par [0025]-[0026]); and establishing, by the first device, a connection with the at least one second device for sharing the at least one capability (read as after the first device 102 determines that the second device 120 is authenticated, the first device 102 connecting with the second device 120, at 214, to share the resource 116/capability using ad hoc connection, figures 1 and 2, par [0010], [0034] and [0041]). Consider claim 11, as applied to claim 10 above, Chien discloses wherein the one or more capabilities comprise at least one of a computing capability, a connectivity capability, a sensing capability, an energy capability, a distributed computing capability, a power capability, a battery capability, a memory capability, a storage capability, or a hardware capability (read as the resource 116 may include data associated with a camera, a microphone, a satellite interface, a wireless interface, a cellular interface, or a combination thereof; when the resource 116 is associated with an external device, the resource 116 may include data received by the first device 102 from a multimedia capture device, a sensor array, a drone aircraft, or a combination thereof, figures 1 and 2, par [0010], [0022]-[0023] and [0041]). Consider claim 12, as applied to claim 10 above, Chien discloses wherein the advertisement message further indicates an exchange system for sharing the one or more capabilities (read as the resource advertisement message 140 including an offer price for sharing resource 116, and a sharing arrangement implemented through payment, credits, bids and counteroffers; for example, the second device 120 would accept that price or submit a bid price, and the resource 116 is shared in exchange for payment at that offer price, par [0012], [0025] and [0031]). Consider claim 13, as applied to claim 12 above, Chien discloses wherein the exchange system is one of a pre-grant exchange, a barter exchange, or a charge exchange (read as the message 140 includes an offer price, the second device 120 would accept that price or submit a bid price, and the resource 116 is shared in exchange for payment at that offer price, par [0012] and [0031]). Consider claim 15, as applied to claim 10 above, Chien discloses forming, by the first device, a respective device group association with each second device of the one or more second devices (read as processor 102 of first device 102 carries out sharing operations, including receiving response request 142 from second devices 120 and determining whether the second device 120 is known or authenticated, establishing an ad hoc connection and trust relationship for sharing, then sharing resource 116 with the second device 120, which corresponding to the processor 104 forming a respective device (sharing) group association with each of the second device 120 participating in the sharing operations, par [0010], [0011], [0019] and [0027]-[0028]). Consider claim 16, as applied to claim 15 above, Chien discloses wherein the device group association is one of a permanent association or an ad hoc association Consider claim 7, as applied to claim 6 above, Chien discloses wherein the device group association is one of a permanent association or an ad hoc association (read as the first device 102 forming the ad hoc connection with other devices such as second device 120 after authentication, par [0010], [0011], [0019] and [0027]-[0028]). Consider claim 17, as applied to claim 10 above, Chien discloses wherein the connection is established via one or more third devices (read as in one case which the first device 102 and second device 120 do not communicate directly, but instead communicate via arbitration server 420, which the arbitration server 420 forwarding data associated with resource between them, par [0014], [0053], [0056] and [0061]; alternative, fifth device 410 in figure 4 (par [0053]) would be read as the claimed “one or more third devices”). Consider claim 18, as applied to claim 17 above, Chien discloses forming, by the first device, a respective device group association with each third device of the one or more third devices (read as the processor of first device 402 (102 in figure 1) controls the operations of first device 402/102 and brings the first device 402/102 into a sharing relationship with second device 404 (120 in figure 1) by communicating with arbitration server 420, authenticating through arbitration server 420, and using arbitration server 420 for resource sharing operations, which corresponding to the processor being configured to form a respective (sharing) device group association each third device participating in the sharing operations, par [0014], [0053], [0055] and [0061]; alternatively, the processor of first device is forming respective (sharing) device group association with each fifth device 410, par [0053]). Consider claim 19, Chien discloses a non-transitory computer-readable medium of a first device having stored thereon instructions that, when executed by one or more processors (read as the first device 102 includes a processor 104 and a memory 106, with memory 106 storing instructions executable by processor 104 to perform operations, figure 1, par [0019]), cause the one or more processors to: output, for transmission to one or more second devices, an advertisement message indicating one or more capabilities of the first device available for sharing with the one or more second devices (read as the first device 102 transmitting resource advertisement message 140 to one or more devices, where the resource advertisement message 140 indicates the type of resource 116 and information associated with it, and where resource 116 includes sharable device functions and interfaces, figure 1, par [0022]-[0025]); receive, from at least one second device of the one or more second devices, a response message requesting at least one capability of the one or more capabilities from the first device (read as based on the received resource advertisement message 140, the second device 120 sends a request (corresponding to a response message) to use the resource 116 and the first device 102receives that request, figures 1 and 2, par [0025]-[0026]); and establish a connection with the at least one second device for sharing the at least one capability (read as after the first device 102 determines that the second device 120 is authenticated, the first device 102 connecting with the second device 120, at 214, to share the resource 116/capability using ad hoc connection, figures 1 and 2, par [0010], [0034] and [0041]). Consider claim 20, as applied to claim 19 above, Chien discloses wherein the one or more capabilities comprise at least one of a computing capability, a connectivity capability, a sensing capability, an energy capability, a distributed computing capability, a power capability, a battery capability, a memory capability, a storage capability, or a hardware capability (read as the resource 116 may include data associated with a camera, a microphone, a satellite interface, a wireless interface, a cellular interface, or a combination thereof; when the resource 116 is associated with an external device, the resource 116 may include data received by the first device 102 from a multimedia capture device, a sensor array, a drone aircraft, or a combination thereof, figures 1 and 2, par [0010], [0022]-[0023] and [0041]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 5 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chien (US 20160072804 A1) in view of Zacks (US 20230084085 A1). Consider claim 5, as applied to claim 1 above, Chien discloses the claimed invention above with advertisement message 140 (par [0024]) and a trust relationship maybe established for sharing the resource using of level of trust (par [0011] and [0022]) but does not specifically disclose wherein the advertisement message further indicates a reputation score indicating a level of trustworthiness for the first device. Nonetheless, Zacks discloses transmitting advertised message as beacon which including trust metric of the transmitting device, wherein trust level is self-advertised to other devices and trust level indicates trustworthiness, par [0017], [0047], [0057]-[0058] and [0066]. Therefore, it would have been obvious for a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Zacks into the teachings of Chien to modify Chien’s resource advertisement message 140 using Zack’s advertised message technique that carries and advertises a trust metric for the transmitting device, in order to improve security and allow the second device 120 to evaluate whether if first device 102 is sufficiently trustworthy before any further communications. Consider claim 14, as applied to claim 10 above, Chien discloses the claimed invention above with advertisement message 140 (par [0024]) and a trust relationship maybe established for sharing the resource using of level of trust (par [0011] and [0022]) but does not specifically disclose wherein the advertisement message further indicates a reputation score indicating a level of trustworthiness for the first device. Nonetheless, Zacks discloses transmitting advertised message as beacon which including trust metric of the transmitting device, wherein trust level is self-advertised to other devices and trust level indicates trustworthiness, par [0017], [0047], [0057]-[0058] and [0066]. Therefore, it would have been obvious for a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Zacks into the teachings of Chien to modify Chien’s resource advertisement message 140 using Zack’s advertised message technique that carries and advertises a trust metric for the transmitting device, in order to improve security and allow the second device 120 to evaluate whether if first device 102 is sufficiently trustworthy before any further communications. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Junpeng Chen whose telephone number is (571) 270-1112. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Thursday, 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony S Addy can be reached on 571-272-7795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /Junpeng Chen/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 16, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672078
METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659760
ANTENNA DEVICE, FWA COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WITH ANTENNA DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR FWA COMMUNICATION
1y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12633636
HIGH FREQUENCY HETERODYNE MIXER
4y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633955
ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING ANTENNA
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627266
POWER AMPLIFICATION APPARATUS AND TRANSMITTER
2y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 11m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 824 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month