Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/444,606

METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR REPORTING CONFIGURED GRANT RESOURCE USAGE STATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 16, 2024
Examiner
TRAN, CONGVAN
Art Unit
2647
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
1033 granted / 1156 resolved
+27.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1190
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
§102
60.0%
+20.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1156 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Xu et al. (2024/0276497). Regarding claim 8, Xu discloses a 8.A User Equipment (UE) for reporting Configured Grant (CG) resource usage status, the UE (see abstract, fig.9, element 905, paragraph [0051], [0217] and its description) comprising: at least one processor (see abstract, fig.9, element 940/905, paragraph [0051], [0217] and its description); and at least one memory coupled to the at least one processor, the at least one memory storing one or more computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor (see abstract, fig.9, elements 930, 905, paragraph [0051], [0217], [0220-0221] and its description), cause the UE to: determine a plurality of Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) occasions within a CG periodicity based on a CG configuration (see abstract, fig.5, element 510, paragraph [0048], [00166-0175], [0281], [0285] and its description); and transmit a respective Unused PUSCH Indicator (UPI) in each PUSCH occasion in the plurality of PUSCH occasions that is used by the UE within the CG periodicity, each UPI indicating a set of one or more PUSCH occasions in the plurality of PUSCH occasions that is not used by the UE within the CG periodicity, wherein a bit length of each UPI is determined based on a total number of the plurality PUSCH occasions within the CG periodicity (see abstract, figs.3-4, elements 115-a, 325, 330, fig.5, element 510, steps 330- 535, paragraphs [0013-0016], [0046-0048], [0059], [0104], [0125-0130], [0135], [0146-0164], [0166-0180] and its description). Regarding claim 9, Xu further discloses wherein each UPI comprises a bitmap, and each bit in the bitmap corresponds to a respective PUSCH occasion of the plurality of PUSCH occasions within the CG periodicity (see paragraphs [0059], [0127-0128], [0153]). Regarding claim 10, Xu further discloses wherein a total number of bits in the bitmap is equal to the total number of the plurality of PUSCH occasions within the CG periodicity (see paragraphs [0059], [0127-0128], [0144]). Regarding claim 11, Xu further discloses wherein each UPI further indicates a second set of one or more PUSCH occasions in the plurality of PUSCH occasions that is scheduled to be used by the UE within the CG periodicity (see paragraphs [0059], [0127-0128], [0153]). Regarding claim 12, Xu further discloses wherein: the plurality of PUSCH occasions within the CG periodicity comprises a first PUSCH occasion, a second PUSCH occasion, and a third PUSCH occasion, and transmitting the respective UPI in each PUSCH occasion of the plurality of PUSCH occasions that is used by the UE within the CG periodicity comprises: transmitting a first UPI in the first PUSCH occasion, the first UPI indicating that the third PUSCH occasion is scheduled to be used; and transmitting a second UPI in the second PUSCH occasion, which occurs after the first PUSCH occasion, the second UPI changing a usage status of the third PUSCH occasion by indicating that the third PUSCH is unused (see figs.3-4, paragraph [0046-0047], [0121], [0146], [0153], [0157-0162] and descriptions) Regarding claim 13, Xu further discloses wherein transmitting the respective UPI comprises transmitting each UPI via Uplink Control Information (UCI) (see abstract, fig.3, element 115-a, 330, paragraph [0125-0128] and its description). Regarding claim 14, Xu further discloses wherein the UCI comprises Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request-Acknowledgment (HARQ-ACK) information, and a transmission priority of the HARQ-ACK information is configured to be greater than a transmission priority of each UPI (see abstract, fig.3, element 115-a, 330, paragraph [0125-0128], [0133-0134] and its description). Regarding claims 1-7 recite limitations substantially similar to the claims 8-14. Therefore, these claims were rejected for similar reasons as stated above. Examiner's Note: Examiner has cited particular columns and line numbers in the references applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. When responding to this Office Action, Applicant is advised to clearly point out the patentable novelty which he or she thinks the claims present, in view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited or the objections made. He or she must also show how the amendments avoid such references or objections See 37 CFR 1.111(c). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CongVan Tran whose telephone number is (571) 272-7871. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison Slater can be reached on (571) 270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PNG media_image1.png 125 125 media_image1.png Greyscale UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE /CONGVAN TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598665
CONNECTION RESUME METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594151
PROCESSING CT SCAN OF DENTAL IMPRESSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593325
INFORMATION EXCHANGES FOR COORDINATED ACCESS POINT OPERATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587334
DESIGN AND CONFIGURATION OF REFERENCE SIGNALS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581351
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXPLOITING INTER-CELL MULTIPLEXING GAIN IN WIRELESS CELLULAR SYSTEMS VIA DISTRIBUTED INPUT DISTRIBUTED OUTPUT TECHNOLOGY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+4.6%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1156 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month