Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/446,036

STEERABLE AND EXPANDABLE ASPIRATION CATHETER

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Aug 08, 2023
Examiner
HOLWERDA, KATHLEEN SONNETT
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute Of Science And Technology
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
652 granted / 949 resolved
-1.3% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
1004
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
43.5%
+3.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 949 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 1/14/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to applicant's arguments against the references individually (i.e., Walzman does not disclose a steering part made of a magnet as claimed, while Stangenes does not disclose an expanding part structure including a tip magnet), one cannot show nonobviousness by attacking references individually where the rejections are based on combinations of references. See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 208 USPQ 871 (CCPA 1981); In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 231 USPQ 375 (Fed. Cir. 1986). As noted in more detail in the rejection below, Walzman disclose an expanding part including a tip magnet as claimed and Stangenes is relied upon for its teaching of a steering part comprising a circular base magnet. Walzman has been modified in view of Stangenes to replace its pull wire steering part with a steering part having a circular base magnet as claimed. Applicant also asserts that, even assuming the substitution of steering mechanisms were accepted, the cited combination neither teaches nor suggests the claimed decoupled control scheme (page 7 of remarks). This is not found persuasive as Walzman discloses that the tip, which is biased open, is collapsed via attraction of the arc-shaped magnets ([0443], [0444]). Thus, the diameter of the catheter end is controlled by a strength of the magnetic field (noting that, when the strength of the magnetic field is zero, the tip remains expanded, and when the strength of the magnetic field is sufficient to overcome any intrinsic resistance of the filter element to collapse, the diameter is reduced as per [0444]). Stangenes expressly discloses that the steering of the circular base magnet (48; figs. 7-9) is controlled by adjusting a direction of the magnetic field applied by the magnetic field generator (22; [0034]; note also figs. 1, 11a,11b). Thus, adjusting the strength of the magnetic field controls a diameter of the end of the catheter and adjusting the direction of the magnetic field controls steering of the catheter end of the device of Walzman as modified by Stangenes. Claim Objections Claim 7 is objected to because of the following informalities: in lines 6-7 “provided an end” should read “provided at an end”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 11 recites “the catheter end” in line 11. Since two catheters are recited in the claim (aspiration catheter in line 1 and pressure-measurement catheter in line 8) it is unclear which previously recited catheter is being referenced. Since the aspiration catheter is claimed as expandable (noting preamble of claim), it is best understood that the catheter end is meant to refer to the end of the aspiration catheter. For purposes of claim interpretation, “the catheter end” is being treated as though it reads “an end of the aspiration catheter”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Walzman (US 2021/0236257) in view of Stangenes et al. (US 2014/0316407). Walzman discloses a steerable and expandable aspiration catheter (1000; fig. 10A) comprising a body (proximal half of solid walled tubular portion of 1000), a steering part provided at the distal end of the body (distal half of solid walled tubular portion of 1000, connected to and controlled by a pull wire; see [0181], [0558]), an expanding part (1004) provided at an end of the steering part (see magnets 1080i-1080iii; fig. 10A) and positioned at an end of the steering part, wherein the expanding part includes a tip magnet part (magnets 1080i-1080iii) and a leg (mesh, or any one of mesh filaments of expandable filter 1004) connecting the tip magnet part and the steering part to each other. The tip magnet part is a combination of a plurality of arc-shaped magnets ([0444] – as understood by “non-linear (e.g., curved)” bar) with polarities disposed in a circumferential direction ([0445)], and is displaced outward in a radial direction based on a strength of the magnetic field generated around the expanding part to expand a diameter of the end of the catheter, and a magnetic field generator (1092 and 1090) generating a magnetic field around the expanding part, wherein the magnetic field generator controls a diameter of an end of the catheter by adjusting a strength of the magnetic field ([0441]-[0444]). Walzman fails to disclose that the steering part is made of a magnet, wherein the steering part controls steering of the steering part based on a direction of the magnetic field. Stangenes discloses another steerable catheter having a lumen therethrough. Stangenes discloses a steering part (flexible distal segment 20; [0029]) provided at an end of a body (12, proximal of 20) of the catheter, wherein the steering part is a circular base magnet 42; figs. 7-9a) and polarities are disposed along a length direction of the catheter ([0064]). A magnetic field generator (22) controls steering of the steering part by adjusting a direction of the magnetic field applied by the magnetic field generator generating unit (22; [0034]; note also figs. 1, 11a,11b). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified the prior art of Walzman to include a steering part comprising a circular base magnet as claimed in view of Stangenes, in place of the pull wire steering mechanism, since such a modification can be considered a substitution of one known steering mechanism (steering part comprising flexible segment and pull wire) for another (steering part comprising a flexible segment and circular base magnet controlled by direction of magnetic field), wherein the results of such a modification are predictable and one skilled in the art would have been a reasonable expectation of success. Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Walzman in view of Stangenes and Atkinson et al. (US 2014/0025143). Walzman discloses a steerable and expandable aspiration catheter (1000; fig. 10A) comprising a body (proximal half of solid walled tubular portion of 1000), a steering part positioned at the distal end of the body (distal half of solid walled tubular portion of 1000, connected to and controlled by a pull wire; see [0181], [0558]), an expanding part (1004) made of a combination of a plurality of magnets (1080i-1080iii; fig. 10A) and positioned at an end of the steering part, and a magnetic field generator (1092 and 1090) generating a magnetic field around the expanding part, wherein the expanding part controls a diameter of an end of the aspiration catheter (note 35 USC 112b rejection above)based on a strength of the magnetic field ([0441]-[0444]). Walzman fails to disclose that the steering part is made of a magnet, wherein the steering part controls steering of the steering part based on a direction of the magnetic field. Stangenes discloses another steerable catheter having a lumen therethrough. Stangenes discloses a steering part (flexible distal segment 20; [0029]) made of a magnet (42; fig. 7) and positioned at an end of a body (12, proximal of 20) of the catheter. The steering part controls steering of the steering part based on a direction of the magnetic field applied by a magnetic field generator (22; [0034]; note also figs. 1, 11a,11b). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified the prior art of Walzman to include a steering part comprising a circular base magnet as claimed in view of Stangenes, in place of the pull wire steering mechanism, since such a modification can be considered a substitution of one known steering mechanism (steering part comprising flexible segment and pull wire) for another (steering part comprising a flexible segment and circular base magnet controlled by direction of magnetic field), wherein the results of such a modification are predictable and one skilled in the art would have been a reasonable expectation of success. Walzman in view of Stangenes fails to disclose a pressure-measurement catheter provided on an outside of the body and configured to measure surrounding pressure. Atkinson et al. discloses an aspiration catheter (300; [0069]; fig. 20) in combination with a guide catheter (80) that includes a pressure sensor for measuring surrounding pressure ([0044]; fig. 20). The guide catheter is provided on an outside of the body of the aspiration catheter (fig. 20). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified the prior art Walzman to include a pressure-measurement catheter on an outside of the body of the aspiration catheter in the form of guide catheter that includes a pressure sensor as taught by Atkinson since some physicians prefer to make periodic intravascular pressure measurements via a guide catheter as taught by Atkinson ([0044]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATHLEEN SONNETT HOLWERDA whose telephone number is (571)272-5576. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8-5, with alternate Fridays off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Elizabeth Houston can be reached at 571-272-7134. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. KSH 3/24/2026 /KATHLEEN S HOLWERDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 08, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Jan 14, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594096
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCED IMPLANTATION OF ELECTRODE LEADS BETWEEN TISSUE LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588908
Independent Gripper
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582431
SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WITH SELECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12564459
ACTIVE DRIVES FOR ROBOTIC CATHETER MANIPULATORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12551657
CUSTOM LENGTH STYLET
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+16.7%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 949 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month