Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/446,704

METHOD FOR GENERATING A RULES PACKAGE DESCRIBING THE CURRENT TRAFFIC SITUATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE, FROM TRAFFIC RULES BASED ON TRAFFIC SIGN RECOGNITION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 09, 2023
Priority
Aug 15, 2022 — DE 10 2022 208 441.1
Examiner
RUDOLPH, VINCENT M
Art Unit
2671
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allowance Rate
127 granted / 275 resolved
-15.8% vs TC avg
Strong +41% interview lift
Without
With
+41.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 7m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
316
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
84.0%
+44.0% vs TC avg
§102
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 275 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/1/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendments filed 5/13/2026 with respect to the objection to the drawings filed 08/09/2023 do overcome the objections. Therefore, the objection is withdrawn. Applicant’s amendments filed 5/13/2026 with respect to the rejections of the claims does overcome the 112(a) and 112(b) issues but raises a new 112(b) rejection. Please see the detailed action below. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the 35 U.S.C. 112 rejections have been fully considered and are persuasive, BUT does raise a different 112 issue. Further discussions can be found below. Based on these facts, this action is made NON-FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-3 and 5-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding independent claims 1 and 9-10, the claims disclose a control unit that includes one or more processors, but the specification only explicitly discloses one control unit. The closest is the last page of the originally filed specification, where it states, “The generated rules package RP is transmitted from the evaluation unit 7 to the encoder/decoder unit 6 and passed on to the in-vehicle field bus 8 so that the rules package RP can be further processed by further control units (not shown) of the motor vehicle 10 that are connected to the field bus 8.” But, as disclosed, the further control units are not shown, not tied to the initial control unit, and appear to be separate and different from the initial control unit disclosed throughout the specification. Thus, it is unclear whether the control unit explicitly includes multiple processors. It is advised the applicant amend the claims to state that the control unit includes at least one processor. It is also advised the applicant amend the specification to further state the control unit includes at least one processor. This way, it will have the proper support and be clear on the record. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Vincent Rudolph whose telephone number is (571)272-8243. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 AM - 3:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VINCENT RUDOLPH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 03, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 01, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12675966
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR IMAGE ANALYSIS
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12664802
METHOD OF PROCESSING IMAGE OBTAINED FROM IMAGING DEVICE INTERLOCKED WITH COMPUTING APPARATUS AND SYSTEM USING THE SAME
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12651370
Interface for Digitization and Detection of Rip Currents Within Optical Imagery by Way of a Fuzzy Set
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12639796
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, RADIATION IMAGING SYSTEM, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633019
SYSTEM OF GENERATING DATA FROM DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED IMAGES FOR PRE-PROCESSING AND METHOD THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+41.2%)
4y 7m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 275 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month