Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/446,846

FREQUENCY ADJUSTMENT FOR SUB-BAND FULL DUPLEX CONFLICT HANDLING

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Aug 09, 2023
Examiner
OVEISSI, MANSOUR
Art Unit
2415
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
749 granted / 902 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
935
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
87.6%
+47.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 902 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-10 and 29-30 have been cancelled. Status of Claims 2. This Office Action is in response to the application filed on 04/01/2026. Claims 11-28 and 31 through 42 are presently pending and are presented for examination. 3. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Response to Arguments 4. Applicant's arguments filed 04/01/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argued that Park does not teach "perform, based at least in part on the one or more second frequency resources at least partially overlapping the one or more first frequency resources in the frequency domain, an adjustment procedure for the one or more first frequency resources to obtain one or more third frequency resources for communication of the first signal”. Examiner respectfully disagrees. Park teaches For existing PDSCH frequency-domain resource allocation, if the scheduled RBs for the PDSCH belong and/or are overlap with the muted DL RBs, the overlapped RB(s) may be considered as rate matched (adjustment procedure) or the WTRU may not expect the overlapping-RB overlapping is the same as frequency resource overlapping. For further reduced RB indication (frequency adjustment) the WTRU may determine the muted (adjusting) DL RBs (frequency resources) by intersecting first RBs matched to (frequency resources adjusted to) the muted (adjusted) BWP (subband) (e.g., corresponding to the value of the BI field) and second RBs corresponding to the frequency domain resource assignment (FDRA) field value (at least paragraph 45). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 5. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11-28 and 31-42 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Park et al. (US 2024/0372661 A1). For claim 11 Park teaches a user equipment (UE) (Fig. 1B “WTRU (UE) 102”), comprising: one or more memories storing processor-executable code (Fig. 1B “memory 130 and memory 132”); and one or more processors coupled with the one or more memories and individually or collectively operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: receive, from a network entity, a first control message indicating one or more first frequency resources associated with a first signal having a first communication direction between the UE and the network entity, the one or more first frequency resources allocated within a sub-band full duplex slot (paragraph 105 “Flexible (e.g., subband-wise) slot format indications may be provided. In examples, the WTRU may receive, for one or more subband(s), an indication of the set of frequency resources corresponding to the subband…the WTRU may receive an indication for each subband applicable to one or more (e.g., all) time slots or time symbols”, paragraph 136 “FIG. 6 illustrates examples of SBFD operations based on Mixed UL/DL types”, and paragraph 137 “ the WTRU may receive the indication selecting a first frequency region is set as ‘UL’ (SB), a second frequency region (e.g., adjacent to the first frequency region) is set as ‘DL’ (SB), and a third frequency region (e.g., adjacent to the second frequency region) is set as ‘DL’ (SB)”); receive, from the network entity, a second control message indicating one or more second frequency resources associated with a second signal having a second communication direction between the UE and the network entity that is different from the first communication direction, wherein the one or more second frequency resources are allocated within the sub-band full duplex slot and at least partially overlap the one or more first frequency resources in a frequency domain (paragraph 105 “Flexible (e.g., subband-wise) slot format indications may be provided. In examples, the WTRU may receive, for one or more subband(s), an indication of the set of frequency resources corresponding to the subband…the WTRU may receive an indication for each subband applicable to one or more (e.g., all) time slots or time symbols”, paragraph 136 “FIG. 6 illustrates examples of SBFD operations based on Mixed UL/DL types”, paragraph 137 “ the WTRU may receive the indication selecting a first frequency region is set as ‘UL’ (SB), a second frequency region (e.g., adjacent to the first frequency region) is set as ‘DL’ (SB), and a third frequency region (e.g., adjacent to the second frequency region) is set as ‘DL’ (SB)”, and paragraph 145 “overlapped frequency-domain resources”); perform, based at least in part on the one or more second frequency resources at least partially overlapping the one or more first frequency resources in the frequency domain, an adjustment procedure for the one or more first frequency resources to obtain one or more third frequency resources for communication of the first signal (paragraph 145 and Fig. 6 “applying rate match (adjustment procedure) to de-overlap overlapped frequency resources”-design configuration); and communicate, in accordance with the adjustment procedure, the first signal via the one or more third frequency resources, the second signal via the one or more second frequency resources, or both, during the sub-band full duplex slot (paragraph 145 and Fig. 6 “applying rate match (adjustment procedure) to d-overlap overlapped frequency resources”-design configuration). For claim 12 Park teaches the UE, wherein: the one or more first frequency resources and the one or more third frequency resources are allocated within a first sub-band of the sub-band full duplex slot configured for the first communication direction (Fig. 6 “illustrates various types frequency resources within SBFD”); and the one or more second frequency resources are allocated at least partially within the first sub-band or at least partially within a guard band between the first sub-band and a second sub-band of the sub-band full duplex slot configured for the second communication direction (Fig. 6 “illustrates various types frequency resources within SBFD”). For claim 13 Park teaches the UE of claim 12, wherein, to perform the adjustment procedure, the one or more processors are individually or collectively operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: select the one or more third frequency resources from the one or more first frequency resources, wherein a resource separation between the one or more third frequency resources and the one or more second frequency resources in the frequency domain satisfies a threshold quantity of resource blocks corresponding to a size of the guard band (Fig. 6 “frequency resource allocation examples” and paragraph 180 “in examples, the cancelling/skipping condition may be based on determining a ratio R1 of a first number of RB(s) for the UL resource being fully overlapped with the first set of RBs to a second number of RB(s) for the UL resource being not overlapped with the first set of RBs If the ratio R1 is less than a threshold (e.g., RUL), R1 transmission of the UL resource may be cancelled/skipped on the symbol (e.g., and other associated symbol(s) for the UL resource)” and paragraph 83 “guard band”). For claim 14 Park teaches the UE of claim 13, wherein, to select the one or more third frequency resources, the one or more processors are individually or collectively operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: select the one or more third frequency resources from a portion of the one or more first frequency resources that does not overlap the one or more second frequency resources (Fig. 6 “frequency resource allocation examples”-design configuration options). For claim 15 Park teaches the UE of claim 13, wherein, to communicate the first signal, the one or more processors are individually or collectively operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: apply rate matching to the one or more third frequency resources based at least in part on selecting the one or more third frequency resources (paragraph 196-197 “applying the muting (e.g., or rate matching or RB(s)-level frequency resource skipping, or RB (s)-level puncturing, etc.)”); and communicate the first signal in accordance with a data rate that is based at least in part on applying the rate matching (as discussed in claim 11 and design configuration options). For claim 16 Park teaches the UE of claim 12, wherein, to perform the adjustment procedure, the one or more processors are individually or collectively operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: shift, within the first sub-band, the one or more first frequency resources to obtain the one or more third frequency resources, wherein the one or more first frequency resources and the one or more third frequency resources comprise a same quantity of resource blocks (Fig. 6 “frequency resource allocation examples”-design configuration options). For claim 17 Park teaches the UE, wherein: the one or more second frequency resources are allocated within a first sub-band of the sub-band full duplex slot configured for the second communication direction (Fig. 6 “frequency resource allocation examples”-design configuration options); and the one or more first frequency resources are allocated at least partially within the first sub-band, wherein performing the adjustment procedure is based at least in part on the one or more first frequency resources being allocated at least partially within the first sub-band (Fig. 6 “frequency resource allocation examples”-design configuration options- and as discussed in claim 11). For claim 18 Park teaches the UE, wherein the one or more processors are individually or collectively further operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: select a type of the adjustment procedure from a plurality of types of adjustment procedures in accordance with one or more rules that are based at least in part on the one or more second frequency resources at least partially overlapping the one or more first frequency resources in the frequency domain (paragraph 196-197 “applying the muting (e.g., or rate matching or RB(s)-level frequency resource skipping, or RB (s)-level puncturing, etc.)” and as discussed in claim 11). For claim 19 Park teaches the UE, wherein the one or more processors are individually or collectively further operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: receive a third control message indicating a type of the adjustment procedure, wherein the adjustment procedure is performed in accordance with the type (paragraph 196-197 “applying the muting (e.g., or rate matching or RB(s)-level frequency resource skipping, or RB (s)-level puncturing, etc.)” and as discussed in claim 11). For claim 20 Park teaches the UE, wherein the one or more processors are individually or collectively further operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: receive a third control message that dynamically schedules the first signal or activates the first signal for semi-persistent scheduling, wherein the third control message is specific to the UE, associated with a group of UEs comprising the UE, or broadcast to each UE of a cell comprising the UE (paragraph 106 “subband-specific slot format indication may be provided. In examples, a WTRU may receive an indication of a slot format for a plurality of subbands (e.g., each of a plurality of subbands”, paragraph 5 “WTRU may be configured by higher layers or ( e.g., dynamically) scheduled to transmit a UL signal”, and paragraph 110 “Subband-specific UL-DL configuration information may be provided. The WTRU may receive UL-DL configuration information from higher layers for at least one subband (e.g. , each of at least one subband)”). For claim 21 Park teaches the UE, wherein: the first signal is dynamically scheduled and the second signal is periodically scheduled or semi-persistently scheduled (paragraph 5 “dynamic scheduling” and paragraph 82 “a WTRU may be configured with various types of periodic/semi persistent”); the first signal is periodically scheduled or semi-persistently scheduled and the second signal is dynamically scheduled (paragraph 5 “dynamic scheduling” and paragraph 82 “a WTRU may be configured with various types of periodic/semi persistent”); or the first signal is periodically scheduled (paragraph 5 “dynamic scheduling” and paragraph 82 “a WTRU may be configured with various types of periodic/semi persistent”) or semi-persistently scheduled and the second signal is periodically scheduled or semi-persistently scheduled (paragraph 5 “dynamic scheduling” and paragraph 82 “a WTRU may be configured with various types of periodic/semi persistent”). For claim 22 Park teaches a network entity (pargraph 25 “Base station”), comprising: one or more memories storing processor-executable code (as discussed in claim 11); and one or more processors coupled with the one or more memories (as discussed in claim 11) and individually or collectively operable to execute the code to cause the network entity to: transmit, to a user equipment (UE), a first control message indicating one or more first frequency resources associated with a first signal having a first communication direction between the network entity and the UE, the one or more first frequency resources allocated within a sub-band full duplex slot (as discussed in claim 11); transmit, to the UE, a second control message indicating one or more second frequency resources associated with a second signal having a second communication direction between the network entity and the UE that is different from the first communication direction, wherein the one or more second frequency resources are allocated within the sub-band full duplex slot and at least partially overlap the one or more first frequency resources in a frequency domain (as discussed in claim 11); and communicate, with the UE, the first signal via one or more third frequency resources, the second signal via the one or more second frequency resources, or both, during the sub-band full duplex slot, wherein the one or more third frequency resources be based at least in part on an adjustment procedure for the one or more first frequency resources, and wherein the adjustment procedure is based at least in part on the one or more second frequency resources at least partially overlapping the one or more first frequency resources in the frequency domain (as discussed in claim 11). For claim 23 Park teaches the network entity, wherein: the one or more first frequency resources and the one or more third frequency resources are allocated within a first sub-band of the sub-band full duplex slot configured for the first communication direction (as discussed in claim 12); and the one or more second frequency resources are allocated at least partially within the first sub-band or at least partially within a guard band between the first sub-band and a second sub-band of the sub-band full duplex slot configured for the second communication direction (as discussed in claim 12). For claim 24 Park teaches the network entity of claim 23, wherein the one or more third frequency resources are selected from the one or more first frequency resources, wherein a resource separation between the one or more third frequency resources and the one or more second frequency resources in the frequency domain satisfies a threshold quantity of resource blocks corresponding to a size of the guard band (as discussed in claim 13). For claim 25 Park teaches the network entity of claim 23, wherein the one or more first frequency resources are shifted within the first sub-band to obtain the one or more third frequency resources, wherein the one or more first frequency resources and the one or more third frequency resources comprise a same quantity of resource blocks (as discussed in claim 16). For claim 26 Park teaches the network entity, wherein: the one or more second frequency resources are allocated within a first sub-band of the sub-band full duplex slot configured for the second communication direction (as discussed in claim 17); and the one or more first frequency resources are allocated at least partially within the first sub-band (as discussed in claim 17). For claim 27 Park teaches the network entity, wherein the one or more processors are individually or collectively further operable to execute the code to cause the network entity to: transmit, to the UE, a third control message indicating a type of adjustment procedure for the one or more first frequency resources, wherein communicating the first signal via the one or more third frequency resources is based at least in part on transmitting the third control message (as discussed in claim 19). For claim 28 Park teaches the network entity, wherein the one or more processors are individually or collectively further operable to execute the code to cause the network entity to: transmit a third control message that dynamically schedules the first signal or activates the first signal for semi-persistent scheduling, wherein the third control message is specific to the UE, associated with a group of UEs comprising the UE, or broadcast to each UE of a cell comprising the UE (as discussed in claim 20). For claim 31 Park teaches a method by a user equipment (UE), comprising: receiving, from a network entity, a first control message indicating one or more first frequency resources associated with a first signal having a first communication direction between the UE and the network entity, the one or more first frequency resources allocated within a sub-band full duplex slot (as discussed in claim 11); receiving, from the network entity, a second control message indicating one or more second frequency resources associated with a second signal having a second communication direction between the UE and the network entity that is different from the first communication direction, wherein the one or more second frequency resources are allocated within the sub-band full duplex slot and at least partially overlap the one or more first frequency resources in a frequency domain (as discussed in claim 11); performing, based at least in part on the one or more second frequency resources at least partially overlapping the one or more first frequency resources in the frequency domain, an adjustment procedure for the one or more first frequency resources to obtain one or more third frequency resources for communication of the first signal (as discussed in claim 11); and communicating, in accordance with the adjustment procedure, the first signal via the one or more third frequency resources, the second signal via the one or more second frequency resources, or both, during the sub-band full duplex slot (as discussed in claim 11). For claim 32 Park teaches the method, wherein: the one or more first frequency resources and the one or more third frequency resources are allocated within a first sub-band of the sub-band full duplex slot configured for the first communication direction (as discussed in claim 12); and the one or more second frequency resources are allocated at least partially within the first sub-band or at least partially within a guard band between the first sub-band and a second sub-band of the sub-band full duplex slot configured for the second communication direction (as discussed in claim 12). For claim 33 Park teaches the method of claim 32, further comprising: selecting the one or more third frequency resources from the one or more first frequency resources, wherein a resource separation between the one or more third frequency resources and the one or more second frequency resources in the frequency domain satisfies a threshold quantity of resource blocks corresponding to a size of the guard band (as discussed in claim 13). For claim 34 Park teaches the method of claim 33, further comprising: selecting the one or more third frequency resources from a portion of the one or more first frequency resources that does not overlap the one or more second frequency resources (as discussed in claim 14). For claim 35 Park teaches the method of claim 33, further comprising: applying rate matching to the one or more third frequency resources based at least in part on selecting the one or more third frequency resources; and communicating the first signal in accordance with a data rate that is based at least in part on applying the rate matching (as discussed in claim 15). For claim 36 Park teaches the method of claim 32, further comprising: shifting, within the first sub-band, the one or more first frequency resources to obtain the one or more third frequency resources, wherein the one or more first frequency resources and the one or more third frequency resources comprise a same quantity of resource blocks (as discussed in claim 16). For claim 37 Park teaches a method by a network entity, comprising: transmitting, to a user equipment (UE), a first control message indicating one or more first frequency resources associated with a first signal having a first communication direction between the network entity and the UE, the one or more first frequency resources allocated within a sub-band full duplex slot (as discussed in claim 11); transmitting, to the UE, a second control message indicating one or more second frequency resources associated with a second signal having a second communication direction between the network entity and the UE that is different from the first communication direction, wherein the one or more second frequency resources are allocated within the sub-band full duplex slot and at least partially overlap the one or more first frequency resources in a frequency domain (as discussed in claim 11); and communicating, with the UE, the first signal via one or more third frequency resources, the second signal via the one or more second frequency resources, or both, during the sub-band full duplex slot, wherein the one or more third frequency resources be based at least in part on an adjustment procedure for the one or more first frequency resources (as discussed in claim 11), and wherein the adjustment procedure is based at least in part on the one or more second frequency resources at least partially overlapping the one or more first frequency resources in the frequency domain (as discussed in claim 11). For claim 38 Park teaches the method, wherein: the one or more first frequency resources and the one or more third frequency resources are allocated within a first sub-band of the sub-band full duplex slot configured for the first communication direction (as discussed in claim 12); and the one or more second frequency resources are allocated at least partially within the first sub-band or at least partially within a guard band between the first sub-band and a second sub-band of the sub-band full duplex slot configured for the second communication direction (as discussed in claim 12). For claim 39 Park teaches the method of claim 38, wherein the one or more third frequency resources are selected from the one or more first frequency resources, wherein a resource separation between the one or more third frequency resources and the one or more second frequency resources in the frequency domain satisfies a threshold quantity of resource blocks corresponding to a size of the guard band (as discussed in claim 13). For claim 40 Park teaches the method of claim 38, wherein the one or more first frequency resources are shifted within the first sub-band to obtain the one or more third frequency resources, wherein the one or more first frequency resources and the one or more third frequency resources comprise a same quantity of resource blocks (as discussed in claim 16). For claim 41 Park teaches the method of claim 37, wherein: the one or more second frequency resources are allocated within a first sub-band of the sub-band full duplex slot configured for the second communication direction (as discussed in claim 17); and the one or more first frequency resources are allocated at least partially within the first sub-band (as discussed in claim 17). For claim 42 Park teaches the method of claim 37, further comprising: transmitting, to the UE, a third control message indicating a type of adjustment procedure for the one or more first frequency resources, wherein communicating the first signal via the one or more third frequency resources is based at least in part on transmitting the third control message (as discussed in claim 19). Conclusion 6. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Awadin et al. (US 2024/0015546 A1). 7. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to David M OVEISSI whose telephone number is (571)270-3127. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8Am-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Rutkowski can be reached at (571) 270 - 1215. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MANSOUR OVEISSI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2415
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 01, 2026
Response Filed
May 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12634049
JOINT CODING AND MULTIPLEXING OF DEFERRED SPS HARQ-ACK
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12621087
METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER STORAGE MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION
2y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615206
Label distribution protocol graceful restart on existing sessions
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12615319
Data Serialization in a Communication Network
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12598018
METHOD FOR MITIGATING INTERFERENCE FROM COEXISTING OFDM-BASED RADIO ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+11.6%)
3y 0m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 902 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month