Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/447,343

METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR CONTROLLING MERISTEM SIZE FOR CROP IMPROVEMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 10, 2023
Examiner
MEHTA, ASHWIN D
Art Unit
6211
Tech Center
6200
Assignee
Pairwise Plants Services Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
83 granted / 113 resolved
+13.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
2 currently pending
Career history
115
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
38.8%
-1.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 113 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group III, claim 67, and species SEQ ID NO: 72 in the reply filed on 07/08/2025 is acknowledged. Applicants also elected the species of SEQ ID NO: 83, however this sequence is not encompassed by the claims of the elected group. New claim 92 reads on the elected group and is also examined herein. Claims 1, 3-5, 7, 9-11, 20, 21, 26, 28, 29, 52, 57, 59, and 60 are withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to non-elected inventions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 67 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Dawe et al. (WO 2021/252619, IDS filed 02/27/2024). Dawe et al. teach guide RNAs targeting the maize compact plant-2 gene (p. 60, lines 25-29; Table 7, p. 62). Table 7 shows the target sequence for a gRNA targeting the CT2 gene, SEQ ID NO: 36. The nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 36, GTAAGGTGCTGGAGAATCG, is comprised within the sequence of instant SEQ ID NO: 72. Dawe et al. teach that CRISPR constructs expressing Cas9 and guide RNAs targeting four genes, including ct2, were first introduced by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation into an inbred plant (p. 60, last paragraph), indicating that Dawe et al. teach guide nucleic acid constructs encoding the guide RNAs. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 92 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dawe et al. (WO 2021/252619) in view of Flavell et al. (US PGPub 2022/0315941, published 10/06/2022, filed 09/28/2018, claims priority to U.S. provisional 62/566,180 filed 09/29/2017). Claim 92 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dawe et al. in view of Flavell et al., published 10/06/22, claims priority to US 62566188, filed 09/29/17). Dawe et al. teach a guide nucleic acid targeting the maize CT2 gene at a target site comprising the nucleotide sequence of instant SEQ ID NO: 72, as discussed above. Dawe et al. teach monocot plants heterozygous for centromeric histone 3 (CenH3) and expressing gene editing constructs, for use in inducing haploids of a monocot target plant and pass-through gene editing (abstract). To test haploid induction with simultaneous gene editing, experiments were designed to cross a cenh3 null to a CRISPR construct expressing Cas9 and eight guide RNAs targeting four genes that control plant development: fea2, fea3, ct2, and td1 (p. 60, Example 2). Dawe et al. do not teach a guide nucleic acid comprising a spacer comprising instant SEQ ID NO: 77. Flavell et al. teach methods for creating modifications in maize plant genomes (abstract). Flavell et al. teach that genes listed in Table 23 may be modified using CRISPR targeting methods (p. 96, [0463]). Table 23 indicates that the compact plant 2 gene affects shoot architecture, and its gene and encoded protein sequences are disclosed in SEQ ID NOs: 573 and 574 (p. 97). Bases 1975-1992 of SEQ ID NO: 573 is the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 36 of Dawe et al. The next few 3’ bases in SEQ ID NO: 573 are GGGAA. Bases 1975-1997 of SEQ ID NO: 573 is the sequence in instant SEQ ID NO: 77 (which is comprised within instant SEQ ID NO: 72). PNG media_image1.png 522 576 media_image1.png Greyscale It would have been obvious and within the scope of one of ordinary skill in the art before the instant effective filing date to have modified the guide nucleic acid of Dawe et al. targeting the ct2 gene to further comprise other adjacent nucleotide bases in the target site of the ct2 gene (Dawe’s SEQ ID NO: 36), including the adjacent GGGAA bases at the 3’ end. One of ordinary skill would have made such a guide nucleic acid, as such a guide nucleic acid would still target the same region within the ct2 gene, and would be functionally equivalent. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASHWIN D MEHTA whose telephone number is (571)272-0803. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:30am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Nolan can be reached at 571-272-0847. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASHWIN D MEHTA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 6211
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 10, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 8003866
PLANTS AND SEEDS OF HYBRID CORN VARIETY CH444919
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 23, 2011
Patent 7999148
COTTON PLANT WITH SEED-SPECIFIC REDUCTION IN GOSSYPOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 16, 2011
Patent 7993926
GUARD CELL-SPECIFIC TOOL FOR MOLECULAR MANIPULATION OF DROUGHT AVOIDANCE/WATER LOSS IN PLANTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 09, 2011
Patent 7982105
TRANSGENIC CORN SEED WITH ENHANCED FREE LYSINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 19, 2011
Patent 7982095
INCREASE IN YIELD BY REDUCING GENE EXPRESSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 19, 2011
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+3.2%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 113 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month