Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/447,626

COMPACTING POWER TOOL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 10, 2023
Priority
Mar 01, 2021 — GB 2102884.0 +1 more
Examiner
ADDIE, RAYMOND W
Art Unit
3671
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
BLACK & DECKER, INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1283 granted / 1576 resolved
+29.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1610
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
74.5%
+34.5% vs TC avg
§102
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1576 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-13, 16-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fukushima et al. US 2014/0076596. Fukushima et al. disclose a soil tamper, such as a jumping jack (10). The jumping jack comprising: A housing (10a) including a reciprocating drive (10b). A motor (12), A compacting foot (10c), an on/off switch (56), an ignition switch (62) and; A controller (70) configured to receive a signal from said switches (56, 62) as well as an engine speed signal from an engine speed sensor; determine the current engine speed is below an idling speed, indicating a machine tip-over event; and send a control signal stop the engine. [0018-23, 30-0038, 0045-56]. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fukushima et al. US 2014/0076596 in view of Becker et al. US 2014/0161541. Fukushima et al. disclose a soil tamper, such as a jumping jack (10). The jumping jack comprising: A housing (10a) including a reciprocating drive (10b). A motor (12), A compacting foot (10c) and; A controller (70) configured to receive an engine speed signal from an engine speed sensor; determine the current engine speed is below an idling speed, indicating a machine tip-over event; and send a control signal stop the engine. But do not disclose the use of a tilt sensor. However, Becker et al. teaches a jumping jack (1) comprising: An engine (3), a drive train and a compacting foot (9). A tilt switching system includes a sensor (49) configured to detect when a maximum degree of tilt has been exceeded, send a signal to a control unit (50), the control unit sends a stop engine signal to stop the engine. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the jumping jack of Fukushima et al. with a tilt switching system as taught by Becker et al. in order to improve safety. Conclusion 10. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND W ADDIE whose telephone number is (571)272-6986. The examiner can normally be reached on m-f 7:30-12:30, then 6-9pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris Sebesta can be reached on 571-272-0547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you need help from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAYMOND W ADDIE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3671 2/24/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 10, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637617
SOIL STABILIZING COMPOSITIONS
4y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637815
SMART ROAD MARKING CONSTRUCTION METHOD, SMART ROAD MARKINGS AND AUTONOMOUS DRIVING SYSTEM USING THE SAME
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635115
Electrical Work Machine Having a Cooled Battery
3y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624516
MODULAR NETWORK ACCESS FRAME AND COVER
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618204
ASPHALT PAVING DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+8.2%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1576 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month