Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/447,627

FASTENING STRUCTURE OF METAL PLATES, DEVICE CONNECTOR INCLUDING FASTENING STRUCTURE OF METAL PLATES, AND WIRE HARNESS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 10, 2023
Examiner
GUGGER, SEAN A
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
434 granted / 677 resolved
-3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
718
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.1%
+11.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
§112
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 677 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed 5 November 2025 have been considered but are moot because the amendment required the new reference shown below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shibuya et al. (“Shibuya”; JP 2020-161349A, English translation attached), in view of Tengler et al. (“Tengler”; US 2008/0272969). Regarding claim 1: Shibuya discloses a fastening structure of metal plates (Fig. 1), comprising: a first metal plate (10) including a first hole portion (11); a second metal plate (2) including a second hole portion (3); and a fastening material (20) fastened to penetrate the first hole portion and the second hole portion, with the first metal plate and the second metal plate overlapping each other (Fig. 1), wherein the first metal plate is provided with a protrusion (12), the second metal plate is provided with a receiving portion (4) in which the protrusion fits, and with the protrusion fitting in the receiving portion, the first metal plate is restricted from rotating with respect to the second metal plate (as show in Fig. 1 and 2). Shibuya does not explicitly disclose a pair of protrusions on one side of the first hole portion. However, Tengler discloses a pair of protrusions (121, Fig. 2) on one side of a first hole portion (52), and receiving portions (101b). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the protrusions, and requisite receiving portions, of Shibuya to be the pair on one side of the first hole, as disclosed by Tengler, in order to better stabilize the connection. Regarding claim 3: Shibuya modified by Yamaguchi discloses a pair of receiving portions, Tengler further discloses one of the receiving portions (101b) constituting the pair is greater in size in a direction in which the receiving portions constituting the pair are arranged than in a direction perpendicular to the direction in which the receiving portions constituting the pair are arranged (as shown in Fig. 2). Claims 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shibuya and Tengler, as applied to claim 1 above, further in view of Kudo (US 2022/0239030). Regarding claim 4: Shibuya modified Tengler discloses the pair of protrusions, Shibuya further discloses a device connector connected to a mating device, the device connector comprising the fastening structure of the metal plates according to claim 1, wherein the first metal plate (10); the second metal plate (2) constitutes an electric wire-side terminal connected to an electric wire (20), the device-side terminal and the electric wire-side terminal being fastened by the fastening material (20, shown in Fig. 1 and 2), the first hole portion (11) and the protrusion (12) are formed on the device-side fastening portion (Fig. 1), the electric wire-side terminal includes an electric wire connection portion (2b) connected to the electric wire and an electric wire-side fastening portion (2a), and the second hole portion (3) and the receiving portion (4) are provided on the electric wire-side fastening portion (Fig. 1). Shibuya does not explicitly disclose the first metal plate constitutes a device-side terminal engaging the mating device, the device connector comprises a housing configured to support the device-side terminal and the electric wire-side terminal, the device-side terminal includes a device-side fitting portion configured to engage the mating device and a device-side fastening portion, and is formed to be bent at a border between the device-side fitting portion and the device-side fastening portion. However, Kudo discloses the first metal plate (320a, 340b, akin to 210 in Fig. 2) constitutes a device-side terminal engaging the mating device (paragraph 0030), the device connector comprises a housing (300) configured to support the device-side terminal (320a, 340a) and the electric wire-side terminal (320b, 340b, Fig. 10), the device-side terminal includes a device-side fitting portion configured to engage the mating device and a device-side fastening portion (via 22), and is formed to be bent at a border (for example, at 24, Fig. 4) between the device-side fitting portion and the device-side fastening portion. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the connector of Shibuya to include the housing and bent portion of Kudo in order to protect the connector and allow for more compact configurations. Regarding claim 5: Shibuya modified by Kudo discloses a wire harness comprising: the device connector according to claim 4; and Shibuya further discloses an electric wire (20) connected to the electric wire-side terminal and extending from the device connector (Fig. 3). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEAN GUGGER whose telephone number is (571)272-5343. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9:00am - 5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, T.C. Patel can be reached at 571 272 2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEAN GUGGER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 10, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 05, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597744
Connector
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592598
SYSTEMS FOR ROTOR INCLUDING COMPOSITE MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592592
A COOLING DEVICE FOR AN ELECTRIC MOTOR STATOR AND A MANUFACTURING PROCESS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586964
GROMMET AND INLET ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586955
PROTECTIVE COMPONENT OF CONNECTOR SOCKET AND PROTECTIVE PLUG CAP THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+23.4%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 677 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month