Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/447,876

BUILT-IN ELECTROLYZER FOR INCREASING DURABILITY OF A FLOW BATTER BY REBALANCING THE ELECTROLYTE COMPOSITION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 10, 2023
Examiner
DOVE, TRACY MAE
Art Unit
1725
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
493 granted / 714 resolved
+4.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
762
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 714 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 5/15/26 has been considered by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group III, claims 14-17 in the reply filed on 5/28/26 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the present claims are directed to a single inventive concept deserving full substantive consideration on the merits. This is not found persuasive because Applicant does not address the reasons for restriction provided by the Examiner in the Office Action of 4/1/26. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 1, 8, 10 and 12 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention. Note claims 2-7, 9, 11 and 13 are canceled. New claims 18-28 depend from claim 14 and are directed toward the elected invention of Group III. An election of species for the main device was required between a redox flow battery, an electrolyzer, a stationary electrochemical energy storage system or other similar device. Examiner has elected a redox flow battery as the species for the main device. Thus, new claim 20 is withdrawn as being directed toward a nonelected species for the main device. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: the specification recites multiple informalities such as “an anode a cathode” at [0009] and “redox flow battery redox flow battery” at [0009]. The entire specification should be reviewed to correct all informalities. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 14-19, 21-25 and 27-28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Pijpers, US2017/0317363 A1. Regarding claim 14 and 15, Pijpers teaches electrochemical balancing cells that can allow adjustment of electrolyte solutions to take place. The electrochemical balancing cells are suitable for placement in fluid communication with both electrolyte solutions of a flow battery (abstract). FIG. 4 shows a diagram of an illustrative flow battery system in which both half-cells of an exemplary flow battery are fluidly connected to the electrochemical balancing cell (shown in FIG. 3): PNG media_image1.png 456 488 media_image1.png Greyscale Figure 4 shows a flow battery 200 (main device), an electrochemical balancing cell 100 (sub device) and an electrolyte (electrolyte tanks 30,40 and flow conduits) wherein electrolyte flows from the flow battery 200 to the balancing cell 100 via inlets 111,121 and from the balancing cell 100 to the flow battery 200 via outlets 112,122. Pijpers is directed, in part, to electrochemical balancing cells that can simultaneously adjust pH (electrolyte property) and balance state of charge (capacity) in electrolyte solutions. Pijpers is also directed, in part, to flow batteries in fluid communication with an electrochemical balancing cell that can simultaneously adjust pH and balance state of charge in electrolyte solutions. Pijpers is also directed, in part, to methods for simultaneously adjusting pH and balancing state of charge in electrolyte solutions using an electrochemical balancing cell [0028]. Regarding claim 16, Pijpers teaches, in various embodiments, the potential applied to the electrochemical balancing cell can range between about 0.1 V and about 2 V. Such voltages can be applicable for ion-selective membranes and bipolar membranes having thicknesses under about 4 mm and for electrolyte solutions having reasonable conductivity values, such as above about 10 mS/cm. In more particular embodiments, the potential applied to the electrochemical balancing cell can be about 1 V or under. By reducing the active material in the positive electrolyte solution within first chamber 110, the potential at first electrode 114 is insufficiently negative to produce hydrogen via reduction. Particularly, by keeping the applied voltage under about 2V, electrolytic generation of hydrogen in the electrochemical balancing cell can be substantially precluded. The lack of hydrogen evolution can provide a high current (conductivity) efficiency to the rebalancing process and improve durability of the flow battery system [0102]. Regarding claim 17, at least one of the active materials within a flow battery can include a coordination complex bearing at least one catecholate ligand or substituted catecholate ligand. Sulfonated catecholate ligands can be particularly desirable substituted catecholate ligands due to their ability to promote solubility of coordination complexes in which they are present. At least one of the active materials within a flow battery can include an iron hexacyanide complex. Iron hexacyanide complexes can be particularly desirable for use as a positive active material in combination with a transition metal coordination complex bearing a catecholate ligand or substituted catecholate ligand as a negative active material due to the high open circuit voltages that can be obtained [0068]. Regarding claims 18 and 19, see at least [0072-0074]. Regarding claim 27 and 28, Pijpers teaches the active material in the negative aqueous electrolyte solution was a titanium catecholate complex, and the active material in the positive aqueous electrolyte solution was an iron hexacyanide complex [0108]. Regarding claims 21-25, see at least Figures 3, 5 and 6. FIG. 5 shows a diagram of the electrochemical balancing cell of FIG. 3 upon introduction of a positive electrolyte solution to the first chamber of the cell, a negative electrolyte solution to the third chamber of the cell, and water or an acidic aqueous solution to the second chamber of the cell in the presence of an applied potential. As shown in FIG. 5, a negative electrolyte solution enters third chamber 130, a positive electrolyte solution enters first chamber 110, and water or an acidic aqueous solution enters second chamber 120 as a potential is applied between first and second electrodes 114 and 124. The applied potential is such that first electrode 114 in first chamber 110 is a negative electrode and second electrode 124 in second chamber 120 is a positive electrode. In the presence of an oxygen-generation catalyst in a membrane electrode assembly at second interface 150, water can undergo oxidation to oxygen and protons (H+). In alternative configurations, the oxygen-generation catalyst can be present in second chamber 120, and the second interface can be a second cation-selective membrane. In either case, the positive active material in first chamber 110 can concurrently undergo reduction. Protons (H+) generated in second chamber 120 can migrate across second interface 150 to affect a pH decrease in the negative electrolyte solution in third chamber 130. A cation (e.g., Na+, K+, or another alkali metal ion) from the negative electrolyte solution in third chamber 130 can likewise migrate across first interface 140 to balance the increased negative charge in the positive electrolyte solution in first chamber 110. The current densities in the electrochemical balancing cell 100 can be maintained such that the pH decrease in the negative electrolyte solution in third chamber 130 is not excessive [0098-0099]. FIG. 6 shows a diagram of the electrochemical balancing cell of FIG. 3 upon introduction of a positive electrolyte solution to the first chamber of the cell, a negative electrolyte solution to the third chamber of the cell, and an alkaline aqueous solution to the second chamber of the cell in the presence of an applied potential. As shown in FIG. 6, a negative electrolyte solution enters third chamber 130, a positive electrolyte solution enters first chamber 110, and an alkaline aqueous solution enters second chamber 120 as a potential is applied between first and second electrodes 114 and 124. The applied potential is such that first electrode 114 in first chamber 110 is a negative electrode and second electrode 124 in second chamber 120 is a positive electrode. In the presence of an oxygen-generation catalyst in second chamber 120, hydroxide ions can undergo oxidation to oxygen and water. The positive active material in first chamber 110 can concurrently undergo reduction. Water from the alkaline aqueous solution and/or water from the negative electrolyte solution in third chamber 130 can enter the bipolar membrane at second interface 150. In the presence of the applied potential, the water can undergo disassociation within the bipolar membrane to form protons (i.e., hydronium ions) and hydroxide ions. The bipolar membrane can be disposed such that the protons migrate into third chamber 130 to affect a pH decrease in the negative electrolyte solution. A cation (e.g., Na+, K+, or another alkali metal ion) from the negative electrolyte solution in third chamber 130 can likewise migrate across first interface 140 to balance the increased negative charge in the positive electrolyte solution in first chamber 110 [0100-0101]. By reducing the active material in the positive electrolyte solution within first chamber 110, the potential at first electrode 114 is insufficiently negative to produce hydrogen via reduction. Particularly, by keeping the applied voltage under about 2V, electrolytic generation of hydrogen in the electrochemical balancing cell can be substantially precluded. The lack of hydrogen evolution can provide a high current efficiency to the rebalancing process and improve durability of the flow battery system [0102]. Thus, the claims are anticipated. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 26 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The claims are directed toward a method of increasing durability of an energy conversion and storage system by rebalancing electrolyte composition, comprising the steps of: providing a main device, providing a sub device, providing an electrolyte, directing said electrolyte from said main device to said sub device, re-balancing capacity and electrolyte properties of said electrolyte in said sub device, and directing said electrolyte from said sub device to said main device. The sub device is a semi-electrolyzer subunit wherein a size of said semi-electrolyzer subunit is less than five percent of a size of said main device. The prior art does not teach or suggest the size of the semi-electrolyzer subunit is less than five percent of the size of the main device. Pijpers teaches the sub device and the main device. However, there is no teaching or suggestion in Pijpers that a size of the sub device is less than five percent of the size of the main device (the claim requires a size significantly smaller at less than five percent). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRACY DOVE whose telephone number is (571)272-1285. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Buie-Hatcher can be reached at 571-270-3879. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRACY M DOVE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 10, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706312
Negative Electrode And Secondary Battery Including The Negative Electrode
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698216
HIGH-PERFORMANCE LITHIUM-NICKEL-MANGANESE-COBALT OXIDE (LNMCO) CATHODE MATERIAL FOR POWER BATTERIES AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12676390
FLEXIBLE WIRING COMPONENT
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673476
TEMPLATE AS WELL AS MANUFACTURING METHOD AND USE, INTERMEDIATE STRUCTURE AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY ELECTRODE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671105
SECONDARY BATTERY AND DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+9.9%)
3y 7m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 714 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month