Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/447,899

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRANSIENT SUPPRESSION

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Aug 10, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, DANNY
Art Unit
2800
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Rivian Ip Holdings LLC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1237 granted / 1373 resolved
+22.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1394
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
40.2%
+0.2% vs TC avg
§102
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1373 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments 1. The indicated allowability of claims 6, 8, 13, 19 is withdrawn in view of the newly discovered reference(s) to Cavallieri et al (USPN 2024/0204455). Rejections based on the newly cited reference(s) follow. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 2. Claim 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 21, the claimed feature “the potting material extends a third distance, greater than the first distance and less than the second distance” is not clear. The drawings and the specification do not support this claimed feature”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 3. Claims 1-3, 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(2) as being anticipated by Cavallieri et al (USPN 2024/0204455). Regarding claim 1, Cavallieri discloses a system (a system 200, see figures 3, 4, 7), comprising: a choke (a choke 400), comprising: an inner surface (an opening 404) defining a cavity, the inner surface configured to surround a plurality of conductive elements (terminals 106, 301); an outer surface (414) configured to couple with a housing (a housing 202, see figure 4) for the plurality of conductive elements (106, 301); and a magnetic material (magnesium zinc alloy material or an iron nickel alloy material 402 of the choke 400, see par. 0034) extending in a first direction perpendicular (a vertical direction of the choke 400) to a lateral plane (such as a lateral plane is formed by a width and length of the opening 404 of the choke 400 see figure 4), the lateral plane intersecting with the plurality of conductive elements (106, 301) (see figures 3, 4). Regarding claim 2, Cavallieri discloses the plurality of conductive elements (106, 301) to electrically connect a multi-phase motor to an inverter (such as the terminals 106, 301 configured to coupled to an inverter (102) with an electric motor (104) in a vehicle, see par. 0002, 0020). Regarding claim 3, Cavallieri discloses wherein the choke (the choke 400) comprises the outer surface (414) of the choke to couple with a first sidewall of the housing (202), see figure 4). Regarding claim 8, Cavallieri discloses the lateral plane is a bounding plane for the plurality of conductive elements (106, 301) surrounded by the inner surface (404) of the choke (400)(see figure 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 4. Claims 5-7, 9-10, 12-17, 20, 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cavallieri et al (USPN 2024/0204455) in view of Mrad (USPN 2022/0270805). Regarding claims 5, 6, 7, 12, 21, Cavallieri discloses wherein the choke (400) comprises the magnetic material (the choke 400 is made of the magnetic material 402) extends a first distance, in the first direction wherein the lateral plane is a bounding plane for the plurality of conductive elements (106, 301) surrounded by the inner surface (the opening 404) of the choke; and the housing (202) extends a second distance, greater than the first distance, to a portion thereof configured to interface with a cap (201) configured to retain a within the housing (see figures 3, 7), and wherein the inner surface (the opening 404) to surround a second sidewall (510) of the housing (202) and a plurality of seals (203), the second sidewall (510) and the plurality of seals (203) configured to separate the plurality of conductive elements (301) (see figure4) Cavallieri does not explicitly disclose a potting material as claimed. Mrad discloses a choke apparatus (see figures 1, 3) comprises a potting material (a potting resin 4) in cavity (28) extends a third distance (a third distance 43), greater than a first distance (a high portion of a choke coil 3 that below a potting level 43) and less than a second distance (a second distance is a lower surface of a cap 12)(see figures 3). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to have modified the choke device of Cavallieri to incorporate a potting material as disclosed by Mrad in order to optimize a thermal stability. Regarding claim 9, Cavallieri discloses a housing (a housing 202), comprising: a first sidewall (inner housing 204, see figure 3, par. 0032 ) including an outer surface thereof; and a second sidewall (210) including an inner surface thereof, the inner surface of the second sidewall (210) facing the outer surface of the first sidewall (204) to define a cavity (206) configured to receive a choke (a choke 400), the choke to surround a plurality of conductive elements (106, 301) bounded by the first sidewall (205) (see figures 6-7); wherein: the choke extends a first distance (such as a distance from the bottom of the housing 202 to a top 406 of the choke 400) , in a first direction perpendicular to a lateral plane (the choke 400 received in the housing 202 in a vertical direction, see figure 7 that is perpendicular to a lateral plane which is formed by a width and a length of the choke 400), wherein the lateral plane is a bounding plane for the plurality of conductive elements (106, 301) surrounded by the inner surface of the choke; and the cavity (206) extends second distance (a second distance from a bottom of the housing 202 to a component 504), greater than the first distance, to a portion thereof configured to interface with a cap (201) configured to retain within the housing. Cavallieri does not explicitly disclose a potting material as claimed. Mrad discloses a choke apparatus (see figures 1, 3) comprises a potting material (a potting resin 4) in cavity (28) (see figures 3). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to have modified the choke device of Cavallieri to incorporate a potting material as disclosed by Mrad in order to optimize a thermal stability. Regarding claim 10, Cavallieri discloses the plurality of conductive elements (106, 301) to electrically connect a multi-phase motor to an inverter (such as the terminals 106, 301 configured to coupled to an inverter (102) with an electric motor (104) in a vehicle, see par. 0002, 0020). Regarding claim 13, Cavallieri discloses the housing (202) extends a third distance (a distance from the bottom of the housing 202 to a side 201 of cover 201), greater than the second distance to a seal element (such as a cover 201). Regarding claim 14, Cavallieri does not explicitly disclose a potting material as claimed. Mrad discloses a choke apparatus (see figures 1, 3) comprises a potting material (a potting resin 4) in cavity (28) (see figures 3). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to have modified the choke device of Cavallieri to incorporate a potting material as disclosed by Mrad in order to optimize a thermal stability. Regarding claims 15, 20, Cavallieri discloses a system (see figures 3-4, 6-7) comprises a housing (a housing 202), comprising: a first sidewall (inner housing 204, see figure 3, par. 0032) including an outer surface thereof; and a second sidewall (210) including an inner surface thereof, the inner surface of the second sidewall (210) facing the outer surface of the first sidewall (204) to define a cavity (206) and a choke (a choke 400) comprising an inner surface (an opening 404) defining a cavity, the inner surface configured to surround a plurality of conductive elements (terminals 106, 301); an outer surface (414) configured to couple with a housing (a housing 202, see figure 4) for the plurality of conductive elements (106, 301); and a magnetic material (magnesium zinc alloy material or an iron nickel alloy material 402 of the choke 400, see par. 0034) extending in a first direction perpendicular (a vertical direction of the choke 400) to a lateral plane (such as a lateral plane is formed by a width and length of the opening 404 of the choke 400 see figure 4), wherein the lateral plane is a bounding plane for the plurality of conductive elements (106, 301) surrounded by the inner surface of the choke; and the housing (202) extends second distance (a second distance from a bottom of the housing 202 to a component 504), greater than the first distance, to a portion thereof configured to interface with a cap (201) configured to retain within the housing. Cavallieri does not explicitly disclose a potting material as claimed. Mrad discloses a choke apparatus (see figures 1, 3) comprises a potting material (a potting resin 4) in cavity (28) (see figures 3). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to have modified the choke device of Cavallieri to incorporate a potting material as disclosed by Mrad in order to optimize a thermal stability. Regarding claim 16, Cavallieri discloses a multi-phase motor (104, see figure 2) electrically connected to a first end of the plurality of conductive elements (106); and a multi-phase inverter (102) electrically connected to a second end of the plurality of conductive elements opposite the first end (see par. 0020). Regarding claim 17, Cavallieri discloses wherein the outer surface (414) of the choke (400) couples with the first sidewall (204) of the housing (202). 5. Claims 4, 11, 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cavallieri et al (USPN 2024/0204455) in view of Fatemi et al (USPN 2024/0056012). Regarding claims 4, 11, 18, Cavellieri discloses the magnetic material, but does not disclose the magnetic material as claimed. However, providing a magnetic material that comprises nanocrystalline is known in the art. Fatemi discloses a choke (150, see figures 1, 4A) for a vehicle motor comprises a magnetic material comprises a nanocrystalline (see par. 0046). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to have modified the magnetic material of Cavallieri to incorporate a nanocrystalline material as disclosed by Fatemi in order to achieve permeability and high saturation limits over a wide frequency range. Conclusion 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANNY NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2054. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Lewis can be reached at 571-271-1838. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANNY NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 10, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750994
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING A DISPLAY PANEL HAVING A COVER FILM
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739945
VAPORIZER DEVICE HEATER CONTROL
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731983
SUPERCONDUCTOR CURRENT LIMITING DEVICE AND AIRCRAFT COMPRISING SUCH A DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733263
TWO-DIMENSIONAL POWER CLAMP CELL
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12731984
PROTECTION CIRCUIT AND RECEIVING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+6.5%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1373 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month