Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/448,694

SELF-LOCKING FILTER CARTRIDGE AND ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 11, 2023
Priority
Aug 12, 2022 — CN 202222114737.9
Examiner
KURTZ, BENJAMIN M
Art Unit
1779
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Qingdao Ecopure Filter Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
637 granted / 1124 resolved
-8.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1169
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1124 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2 and 4-24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pan CN 205953604 in view of Ouyang et al. CN 114405133. Claim 1, Pan teaches a filter cartridge comprising: a housing (1) enclosing a filter chamber and a filter element (3) disposed therein, a valve assembly comprising: a coupling configured to engage an adapter of a filtration system, an inlet channel (11 to 23) that is in fluid communication with the coupling and the filter chamber, a wastewater outlet valve (5) disposed in an outlet channel that is in fluid communication with the coupling and the filter chamber, wherein the wastewater outlet valve comprises an outlet valve poppet that is biased to seal against an outlet valve housing (see below) by a biasing member (52), wherein the outlet valve housing is connected to an outlet valve socket (see below) formed in the housing of the filter cartridge, and the biasing member is disposed between the outlet valve socket and the outlet valve poppet, a purified water outlet channel extending through the outlet valve poppet, wherein a purified water outlet channel is in fluid communication with a purified outlet of the filter element, and a purified water outlet valve (at 6), disposed in the purified water outlet channel, wherein the purified water outlet valve is capable of being moved into an open condition by a central protrusion extending from an adapter (fig. 1-3). Pan does not teach the filter element comprising a center channel or an outlet tube extending into the filter chamber through the center channel of the filter element. The recitation of the filter cartridge being for a water filtration system which comprises an adapter including a central protrusion and one or more outer protrusions is a recitation of intended use and does not provide any further structural limitations to the filter cartridge. Pan teaches the filter element is a reverse osmosis filter (abstract). Ouyang teaches a reverse osmosis filter element (130) comprising a center channel and an outlet tube (at 134) that extends into a filter chamber of a housing (110) through the center channel of the filter element (fig. 1). Reverse osmosis filter elements with an center channel with an outlet tube is a very common feature in the art and would have been well within the normal capabilities of one of ordinary skill in the art. The claim would have been obvious because a particular known technique was recognized as part of the ordinary capabilities of one skilled in the art, KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). PNG media_image1.png 601 864 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 12, Pan in view of Ouyang teaches a water filtration system comprising: an adapter (9) comprising an inlet (91), an outlet (93), a cartridge receptacle in fluid communication with the inlet and an outlet receptacle in fluid communication with the outlet and a filter cartridge according to claim 1, as detailed above (fig. 1-3). Pan teaches the filter cartridge comprises a central protrusion (6) and an outer protrusion (53) that are part of the valve assembly that interact with the adapter to open the valve assembly (fig. 2). The recitation of the adapter comprising the central protrusion and outer protrusion is a recitation of a rearrangement of the parts of Pan, namely moving the protrusions of Pan from the filter cartridge to the adapter. Shifting the position of an element is unpatentable if shifting the position of the element would not modify the operation of the device, In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70 (1950). Moving the protrusions to the location as claimed would not modify the operation of the device as the protrusions would act on the valve assembly to open the valve assembly. Claims 2, 5, 8-9, 13, 16 and 19-20, Pan further teaches an inlet valve (4) disposed in the inlet channel, the inlet valve is configured to be opened by water pressure applied to the inlet valve via the inlet channel (fig. 1-2); the inlet channel is offset from a center of the valve assembly and the outlet channel is in a center of the valve assembly (fig. 1-2); the outlet valve housing comprises an outlet valve chamber having a frustoconical valve seat (at 51) for forming a seal with the outlet valve poppet (fig. 1-2); and the outlet valve poppet comprises a seal member (51) for forming a seal with the valve seat of the outlet valve housing (fig. 1-2). Claims 4 and 14, the wastewater outlet valve and purified water outlet valve can be opened simultaneously by protrusions of an adapter. Claims 10 and 21, Pan further teaches the outlet valve poppet comprises a seal element (the smooth surface) for forming a seal with a purified water outlet of the housing (fig. 1-2) and Ouyang further teaches the outlet tube comprises a seal element for forming a seal with a purified water outlet of the housing (fig. 2). Claims 11 and 22, Pan further teaches the filter element is a reverse osmosis filter (abstract) and Ouyang further teaches the outlet tube comprises a plurality of perforations (fig. 1). Claim 15, Pan further teaches the central protrusion and the outer protrusion simultaneously cause the wastewater outlet valve and the purified water outlet valve to open when the filter cartridge is coupled to the adapter (fig. 1-2). Claim 23, Pan in view of Ouyang teaches the cartridge of claim 1, and further teaches the filter cartridge comprises a central protrusion (6) and an outer protrusion (53) that are part of the valve assembly that interact with an adapter to open the valve assembly (fig. 2). The recitation of the adapter comprising the central protrusion and outer protrusion is a recitation of a rearrangement of the parts of Pan, namely moving the protrusions of Pan from the filter cartridge to the adapter. Shifting the position of an element is unpatentable if shifting the position of the element would not modify the operation of the device, In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70 (1950). Moving the protrusions to the location as claimed would not modify the operation of the device as the protrusions would be able to act on the valve assembly to open the valve assembly. Additionally, providing the protrusion (6) of the purified water outlet valve on the adapter rather than on the purified water outlet valve would make the purified water outlet valve to have an actuating end that is recessed within the outlet valve poppet as shown in the annotated figure below. Also, providing a recessed actuating end of a valve is a known feature as demonstrated by Ouyang as shown in the annotated figure below. The claim would have been obvious because a particular known technique was recognized as part of the ordinary capabilities of one skilled in the art, KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). Claim 24, as shown below, if the protrusion (6) of Pan were moved from the purified water outlet valve to an adapter, the purified water outlet valve would be entirely disposed within the purified water outlet channel (see below). Claims 25-27, Pan further teaches the outlet valve housing is at least partially positioned within the outlet valve socket (see above); the outlet valve poppet is at least partially positioned within the outlet valve housing (see above); and the biasing member is a coil spring that fits around a portion of the housing and the outlet valve poppet (fig. 1). Claim 28, Pat further teaches the outlet valve socket is formed in the housing of the filter cartridge but does not specifically teach the outlet valve socket being integrally formed in the housing. [T]he use of a one piece construction instead of the structure disclosed in [the prior art] would be merely a matter of obvious engineering choice; In re Larson 144 USPQ 23 1952. PNG media_image2.png 543 576 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 573 597 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 571 634 media_image4.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 5/27/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments are addressed in the body of the rejection above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN M KURTZ whose telephone number is (571)272-8211. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bobby Ramdhanie can be reached at 571-270-3240. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN M KURTZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1779
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 11, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 21, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 27, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678718
FILTER ELEMENT WITH BIPLANAR O-RING
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678721
LIQUID FILTER AND FILTER ELEMENT
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12649671
SYSTEM FOR CAPTURING AND RECYCLING WASHING COMPONENTS
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12649982
HIGH TEMPERATURE TREATED MEDIA
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12643061
FILTER ASSEMBLY WITH AUTHENTICATING FILTER ELEMENT COUPLING AND REPLACEABLE DROP-IN TWIST LOCKING FILTER ELEMENT THEREFOR
6y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+17.6%)
3y 1m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1124 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month