Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/448,829

DOORBELL PACKAGE DETECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 11, 2023
Examiner
FEREJA, SAMUEL D
Art Unit
2487
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Skybell Technologies Ip LLC
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
458 granted / 614 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
66 currently pending
Career history
680
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
64.1%
+24.1% vs TC avg
§102
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
§112
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 614 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Currently, claims 1-3, 5-10, 15, 21-23 and 25-31 are pending in the application. Claims 1 and 15 have been amended. Claim 24 cancelled & added Claim 31 Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 1. A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/29/2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments / Amendments Applicant’s arguments have been fully considered, but they are not persuasive, see discussion below. The applicant argued that Fadell and the other references fail to teach, disclose, or make obvious determining any dimensions of a parcel, and opening a garage door "an amount at least partially based on a smallest dimension." As to the above argument, Faddel discloses a3 garage door opening system ([0247], FIG. 8C) and 6 garage door opener configured to perform an action selected from the group consisting of opening a garage door, closing the garage door with smart-home environment with one or more intelligent, multi-sensing, network-connected appliances, such as intercom systems, gated entries, garage-door openers ([0057], FIG. 1) In addition to Faddel, Eichenblatt teaches opening the garage door an amount at least partially based on a smallest dimension of the delivery parcel with permit packages to pass without necessarily allowing a full-grown person to pass or the package door 3 may be a door that is a subsection of a larger-sized door 4 with flexible types and sizes of a security gate ([0025], FIG. 4) Eichenblatt teaches package size information is stored in the attribute data 27 such that the system logic 25 is configured to unlock the secondary locking mechanism 55 automatically for particular packages (sizes) such as a user or courier may enter into the attribute data 27, in advance of the courier's arrival, package information indicating that the package's size is too large to pass through the doorway of the package door 3 and the computing device 19 based on the package size information included in the attribute data 27 may signal for the secondary locking mechanism 55 to automatically unlock ([0051]) It should be further noted that Applicant has not presented any specific arguments with regards to the rejections of the dependent claims. Accordingly, Examiner maintains the rejection with regards to above arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 5-10, 15, 21-23 and 25-31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Faddel et al. (US 20150156031, hereinafter Faddel) in view of Eichenblatt (US 20160247344, hereinafter Eichenblatt), Lyman et al. (US 20150310381, hereinafter Lyman) Zundel et al. (US 20170236193, hereinafter Zundel). Regarding claim 1, Faddel discloses a3 garage door opening system comprising: a parcel identification detection system configured to detect a delivery parcel identification code of a delivery parcel ([0247], FIG. 8C, sensors 828 detect when packages are delivered to the door of the smart-home environment and scan the bar code or other type of identifying tag affixed to or associated with the package; [0248], bar code to obtain information about the package); 6 a garage door opener configured to perform an action selected from the group consisting of opening a garage door, closing the garage door, and combinations thereof([0057], FIG. 1, smart-home environment with one or more intelligent, multi-sensing, network-connected appliances, such as intercom systems, gated entries, garage-door openers; [0350], automatically detecting any suitable package identification information without requiring any specific activity on behalf of the deliverer such as detecting suitable package identification information using NFC or RFID or Bluetooth technology; [0358], access to the deliverer by opening door 186 by unlocking doorknob 122 for a certain amount of time via Bluetooth or any other suitable protocol communication); and a computing system configured to receive the delivery parcel identification code detected by the parcel identification detection system ([0246], barcode scanner; [0326], obtain identifying information from a code, such as a linear barcode, a two-dimensional or matrix barcode, a three-dimensional barcode; [0350], automatically detecting any suitable package identification information without requiring any specific activity on behalf of the deliverer such as detecting suitable package identification information using NFC or RFID or Bluetooth technology ), send a communication to the garage door opener in response to determining that the delivery parcel identification code is indicative of the delivery parcel being an expected delivery ([0358], access to the deliverer by opening door 186 by unlocking doorknob 122 for a certain amount of time via Bluetooth or any other suitable protocol communication; [0368], accessible opening to the secure to partially indicate to deliverer DL where and how to deposit the package securely), Faddel does not explicitly disclose wherein the garage door opener is configured to open the garage door an amount at least partially based on a smallest dimension of the delivery parcel and comparing (compare) the delivery parcel identification code to a database comprising an expected delivery identification code. Eichenblatt teaches wherein the garage door opener is configured to open the garage door an amount at least partially based on a smallest dimension of the delivery parcel ([0025], FIG. 4,the package door 3 may be smaller to permit packages to pass without necessarily allowing a full-grown person to pass or the package door 3 may be a door that is a subsection of a larger-sized door 4 with flexible types and sizes of a security gate, such as wrought iron exterior gate; a garage door; a door for a drop box, mail box, large box or bench; a door through a building wall; and other types of doors; [0051] package size information is stored in the attribute data 27 such that the system logic 25 is configured to unlock the secondary locking mechanism 55 automatically for particular packages (sizes) such as a user or courier may enter into the attribute data 27, in advance of the courier's arrival, package information indicating that the package's size is too large to pass through the doorway of the package door 3 and the computing device 19 based on the package size information included in the attribute data 27 may signal for the secondary locking mechanism 55 to automatically unlock) and comparing (compare) the delivery parcel identification code to a database comprising an expected delivery identification code ([0031], FIG. 2, attribute data 27 are stored in memory 29 (database) and system logic 25 determines whether the package data 23 corresponds to at least one attribute defined by the attribute data). Eichenblatt also teaches tracking number or other information may be wirelessly transmitted from the package or a device carried by the courier to the data input device 7 using Bluetooth, radio frequency identification (RFID), near field communication (NFC), or other wireless technology ([0045] FIG. 3) and package or a device carried by the person delivering the package may also be equipped with a wireless communication device, such as an RFID or NFC device, that wirelessly communicate package attributes, such as a package identifier, sender or recipient name, or other package information, to the data input device 7 ([0060]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system disclosed by Faddel by explicitly using the package attributes data as taught by Eichenblatt as above as one of known techniques in the art and in order to ensure secured package delivery and tracking (Eichenblatt, [0026]). Faddel further discloses detecting position information of a delivery vehicle relative the garage door opening system by sensing visitor information at any particular location of detected visitor information with vehicle of such a delivery truck of a deliverer is identified using one or more sensing components or detection resource in which a visitor is detected at different locations at a particular distance using facial recognition or other suitable detection systems or RFID tag detection ([0454]). However, Faddel and Eichenblatt do not explicitly an expected delivery time associated with the delivery parcel, and that a current time of day is within a period of time encompassing the expected delivery time, such that the garage door opener is configured to open the garage door in response to each of identifying that the current time of day is within the period of time encompassing the expected delivery time and detecting the delivery parcel identification code. Lyman teaches an expected delivery time associated with the delivery parcel, and that a current time of day is within a period of time encompassing the expected delivery time, such that the garage door opener is configured to open the garage door ([0038], provide temporary access code to unlock the front door, a temporary frequency code configured to open the garage door wirelessly, or a temporary keypad code configured to open the garage door via a keypad outside the garage door that operates only during a predetermined time period (e.g., based on an expected time of delivery received by the monitoring module 205, etc.), upon detecting the arrival of the delivery person, and/or upon authenticating the identity of the delivery person). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system disclosed by Faddel and Eichenblatt by an expected delivery time associated with the delivery parcel as taught by Lyman as above enabling monitoring the delivery area while the delivery person is delivering the package, capturing photo and/or video images of the delivery area which is captured and sent to occupants of the premises in a real-time to enable the occupant to monitor delivery in-progress (Lyman, [0022]). However, Lyman do not explicitly opening the garage door in response to each of identifying that the current time of day is within the period of time encompassing the expected delivery time and detecting the delivery parcel identification code Zundel teaches opening the garage door in response to each of identifying that the current time of day is within the period of time encompassing the expected delivery time and detecting the delivery parcel identification code ([0028] communicate a scheduled delivery time for the parcel and generate an access code based on the scheduled delivery time such as if purchase of an item were made on January 1 and delivery of the item were scheduled for January 4 after 1:00 PM and before 3:00 PM, then automation system may receive the scheduled delivery time and generate the access code based at least in part on the scheduled delivery time. For example, the automation system may generate the access code on January 4 at 12:00 PM, or one hour before the time window during which the item is scheduled to be delivered, and provide the access code to a machine of the delivery service or delivery person. In some cases, the POS system may generate the access code at the time of sale or at a delayed time and provide the generated access code to a machine of the delivery service or delivery person) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system disclosed by Faddel and Eichenblatt by an expected delivery time associated with the delivery parcel as taught by Zundel as above providing secure delivery module provides the generated access code to a delivery service to enable the delivery service to securely deliver the item to the premises such as inside a secured area of the premises (Zundel, [0023]). Regarding claim 2, Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 1. Faddel discloses wherein the first computer system is communicatively coupled to the parcel identification detection system and the garage door opener ([0326]; [0358], a deliverer device is communicatively coupled with a smart device of environment 100, paired via Bluetooth or any other suitable protocol). Regarding claim 3, Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 1. Faddel discloses wherein the parcel identification detection system is coupled to a building that comprises the garage door ([0057], FIG. 1, smart-home environment with one or more intelligent, multi-sensing, network-connected appliances, such as intercom systems, gated entries, garage-door openers). Regarding claim 5, Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 1. Faddel further discloses wherein the garage door opener is configured to close the garage door in response to a predetermined amount of time passing ([0358], access to the deliverer by opening door 186 by unlocking doorknob 122 for a certain amount of time ; a deliverer device 266 is communicatively coupled with a smart device of environment 100, paired via Bluetooth or any other suitable protocol;[0368], temporarily accessible opening to the secure area or more output components of doorbell 106 configured to at least partially indicate to deliverer DL where and how to deposit the package securely; [0373], suitable smart device of environment 100 are selectively opened and closed). Regarding claim 6, Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 1. Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses further comprising a camera system configured to take a first picture of the delivery parcel and to take a second picture of the garage door in an at least partially open state (Faddel: [0226], CCD sensor incorporated in any of a variety of different smart-home garage door openers; [0326], obtain identifying information using still or video camera; Eichenblatt: [0083] a picture of the user is taken and the package door is opened). Regarding claim 7, Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 1. Faddel discloses further comprising a camera configured to take a first picture of the delivery parcel, wherein the garage door opening system is configured to send the first picture to a remote computing device ([0082], live video feeds and function as security cameras; [0136], transmit video to the central server and cloud-computing system; [0204], the camera in the doorbell 106 can transmit their image to the smart wall switches [0374]). Regarding claim 8, Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 1. Faddel in view of Eichenblatt discloses further comprising a camera configured to take a first picture of the delivery parcel in response to the parcel identification detection system detecting the delivery parcel (Faddel: [0226], CCD sensor incorporated in any of a variety of different smart-home garage door openers; [0326], obtain identifying information using still or video camera; Eichenblatt: [0083] a picture of the user is taken and the package door is opened). Regarding claim 9 Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 1. Faddel discloses wherein the parcel identification detection system comprises a camera, and the parcel identification detection system is configured to detect the delivery parcel identification code in response to the camera taking a picture of a barcode on the delivery parcel ([0082], live video feeds and function as security cameras; [0136], transmit video to the central server and cloud-computing system; [0204], the camera in the doorbell 106 can transmit their image to the smart wall switches [0374]). Regarding claim 10 Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 9. Faddel discloses 26 wherein the parcel identification detection system is configured to detect the delivery parcel identification code in response to analyzing the picture to identify the delivery parcel identification code ([0326], obtain identifying information using still or video camera; [0385], analyzing the detected package information using a computing system that is communicatively coupled to the entryway interface smart device). Regarding Claim 15, Garage door opening system claims 15 of using the corresponding method claimed in claim 1, and the rejections of which are incorporated herein for the same reasons as used above. Faddel further discloses an image analysis system configured to analyze a picture taken by the camera to determine that the entity has left at least a portion of a field of view of the camera, wherein the garage door opener is configured to close the garage door in response to the image analysis system determining that the entity has left ([0326], obtain identifying information using still or video camera; [0385], analyzing the detected package information using a computing system that is communicatively coupled to the entryway interface smart device). Regarding claim 21 Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 8. Faddel discloses 26wherein the garage door is configured to close in response to capturing the picture of the delivery parcel ([0329], communicating digital data from a deliverer's mobile device; [0348], [0349], the information associated with the package detected by capturing image data of deliverer DL (deliverer identification) and package PL; [0350]). Regarding claim 22 Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 1. Faddel discloses wherein the expected delivery time is an expected delivery time window, and wherein the garage door is configured to open at a beginning of the expected delivery time window and to close at an end of the expected delivery time window. Regarding claim 23 Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 22. Lyman discloses wherein the garage door is configured to open at a predetermined time before the beginning of the expected delivery time window ([0038], provide temporary access code to unlock the front door, a temporary frequency code configured to open the garage door wirelessly, or a temporary keypad code configured to open the garage door via a keypad outside the garage door that operates only during a predetermined time period (e.g., based on an expected time of delivery received by the monitoring module 205, etc.), upon detecting the arrival of the delivery person, and/or upon authenticating the identity of the delivery person). The same reason or rational of obviousness motivation applied as used above in claim 1. Regarding claim 25 Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 1. Faddel discloses wherein the parcel identification detection system is configured to receive position location information, of a remote computing device associated with a delivery vehicle, relative to the garage door opening system, and wherein the computing system is further configured to verify that the remote computing device is within a predetermined distance from the garage door opening system in connection with receipt of location position information of the remote computing device ([0454], sensing visitor information at any particular location of detected visitor information with vehicle of such a visitor (car of a system user or delivery truck of a deliverer) identified using one or more sensing components or detection resource in which a visitor is detected at different locations (LA, LB, LC) at a particular distance (DD) using facial recognition or other suitable detection systems or RFID tag detection, etc.). Regarding claim 26 Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 25. Faddel discloses wherein the computing system is further configured to send a communication to the garage door opener in response to determining that the remote computing device is within the predetermined distance from the garage door opening system ([0454], sensing visitor information at any particular location of detected visitor information with vehicle of such a visitor (car of a system user or delivery truck of a deliverer) identified using one or more sensing components or detection resource in which a visitor is detected at different locations (LA, LB, LC) at a particular distance (DD) using facial recognition or other suitable detection systems or RFID tag detection, etc.). Regarding claim 27 Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 15. Faddel discloses further comprising a camera configured to take a picture of at least one of the delivery parcel and an entity that delivers the delivery parcel in response to the parcel identification detection system detecting the delivery parcel. ([0329], communicating digital data from a deliverer's mobile device; [0348], [0349], the information associated with the package detected by capturing image data of deliverer DL (deliverer identification) and package PL; [0350]), Regarding claim 28 Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 27. Faddel discloses further comprising an image analysis system configured to analyze a picture taken by the camera to determine that the entity has left at least a portion of a field of view of the camera, wherein the computing system is configured to disable the digital key, and the garage door opener is configured to close the garage door, in response to determining that the entity has left ([0326], obtain identifying information using still or video camera; [0385], analyzing the detected package information using a computing system that is communicatively coupled to the entryway interface smart device). Regarding claim 29 Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 27. Faddel discloses wherein the computing system is configured to disable the digital key, such that the garage door opener is configured to close the garage door a predetermined amount of time after the camera takes the picture of the delivery parcel ([0326], obtain identifying information using still or video camera; [0385], analyzing the detected package information using a computing system that is communicatively coupled to the entryway interface smart device). Regarding claim 30 Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 15. Lyman discloses wherein the database further comprises an expected delivery time associated with the delivery parcel, and wherein the computing system provides the digital key to the remote computing device at a predetermined time prior to the expected delivery time ([0038], provide temporary access code to unlock the front door, a temporary frequency code configured to open the garage door wirelessly, or a temporary keypad code configured to open the garage door via a keypad outside the garage door that operates only during a predetermined time period (e.g., based on an expected time of delivery received by the monitoring module 205, etc.), upon detecting the arrival of the delivery person, and/or upon authenticating the identity of the delivery person). The same reason or rational of obviousness motivation applied as used above in claim 1. Regarding claim 31 Faddel in view of Eichenblatt , Lyman & Zundel discloses the614 system of Claim 30. Lyman wherein the computing system is configured to disable the digital key at a predetermined time past the expected delivery time([0038], provide temporary access code to unlock the front door, a temporary frequency code configured to open the garage door wirelessly, or a temporary keypad code configured to open the garage door via a keypad outside the garage door that operates only during a predetermined time period (e.g., based on an expected time of delivery received by the monitoring module 205, etc.), upon detecting the arrival of the delivery person, and/or upon authenticating the identity of the delivery person). The same reason or rational of obviousness motivation applied as used above in claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Samuel D Fereja whose telephone number is (469)295-9243. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVID CZEKAJ can be reached on (571) 272-7327. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMUEL D FEREJA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2487
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 11, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 24, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 28, 2024
Response Filed
Aug 31, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 21, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 24, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 12, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 29, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 16, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 16, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 29, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597264
Method for Calibrating an Assistance System of a Civil Motor Vehicle
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598318
METHOD AND SYSTEM-ON-CHIP FOR PERFORMING MEMORY ACCESS CONTROL WITH LIMITED SEARCH RANGE SIZE DURING VIDEO ENCODING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593018
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PERCEPTUAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL ELEMENTS FOR DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593036
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING VIDEO SIGNAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591123
METHOD FOR DETERMINING SLOPE OF SLIDE IN SLIDE SCANNING DEVICE, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SLIDE SCANNING DEVICE AND SLIDE SCANNING DEVICE USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+11.8%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 614 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month