Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/449,307

MAGNETIC RECORDING MEDIUM, MAGNETIC TAPE CARTRIDGE, AND MAGNETIC RECORDING AND REPRODUCING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 14, 2023
Examiner
RICKMAN, HOLLY C
Art Unit
1785
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Fujifilm Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
403 granted / 571 resolved
+5.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
594
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§102
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 571 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-11, and 13-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2020/105492 (pg. numbers refer to English machine translation and Fig. numbers refer to Japanese WIPO document included with this action) in view of Yamaga et al. (US 2020/0402531). WO’492 discloses magnetic particles for use in magnetic recording applications (see third embodiment on p. 4 of translation and abstract). The reference teaches the particles are formed from ε-iron oxide having the following x-ray diffraction profile: PNG media_image1.png 306 399 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 343 393 media_image2.png Greyscale Based on the maximum peaks in the 2θ ranges shown in annotated Fig 1C, INT1/INT2 can be estimated to be about 0.7/0.4= 1.75. This falls within the claimed Int1/Int2 ranges of claims 1-2. It is noted that the horizontal measurement lines in Figure 1C represent arbitrary units. For purposes of calculating relative intensity INT1/INT2, each horizontal line is considered to be 0.5 AU. The reference is silent with regard to the recording medium structure including a nonmagnetic support with the ferromagnetic powder thereon. Yamaga et al. teaches that a conventional magnetic recording medium includes a nonmagnetic tape substrate and a magnetic recording layer thereon containing ε-Fe2O3 powder (see Fig 1, abstract and para. [0046]-[0048]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to form the magnetic powder taught by WO’492 on a nonmagnetic tape substrate in order to form a functional magnetic recording medium. With regard to claims 4-6, WO’492 discloses that the iron oxide can have the formula ε-MxFe2-xO3 wherein M is a metal having a valence of 3 (see claim 9 on last p. of translation). Choice of any metal having a valence of +3, including Co, Ga, Al and Ti as claimed, would have been obvious in view of the apparent suitability of all +3 metals. With regard to claims 7-9, Yamaga et al. teaches that a conventional magnetic recording tape structure includes a nonmagnetic layer between the substrate and the magnetic recording layer and a backlayer on the opposite side of the substrate (see para [0046] and Fig 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the magnetic particles taught by WO’492 in a conventional tape structure having a backlayer/base layer/nonmagnetic layer/magnetic layer structure in order to form a functional recording tape. Claims 10-11 and 13-17 are directed to a tape cartridge comprising the above-described tape. It is noted that the recitation of the “cartridge” in the preamble is directed to an intended use and does not impart any additional structure to the claimed tape medium. In any case, Yamaga et al. teaches that the conventional recording tape taught therein is suitable for use in a tape cartridge (See [0028]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use the ε-Fe2O3 magnetic powder taught by WO’492 to form a magnetic recording tape for use in a cartridge structure. Claim 18 is directed to a recording and reproducing device including the magnetic recording medium of claim 1. It is noted that the recitation of the “magnetic recording and reproducing device” in the preamble is directed to an intended use and does not impart any additional structure to the claimed tape medium. In any case, Yamaga et al. teaches that it was known in the art to use an ε-Fe2O3 magnetic tape medium in a recording reproducing device. Thus, the tape suggested by the combination of WO’492 and Yamaga et al. would have been obvious to use in a magnetic read/write apparatus. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3 and 12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The closest prior art to WO’492 fails to teach or suggest a magnetic recording medium having an INT1/INT2 value of 3.0-5.5 wherein INT1 is the max value of diffraction intensity in a range where the diffraction angle 2θᵪ is 29.0-31.0° and INT2 is the max value of diffraction intensity in a range where the diffraction angle 2θᵪ is 36.3-37.5°. Instead, WO’492 discloses only am INT1/INT2 value of approximately 1.75 at these diffraction angles. The prior art fails to suggest a motivation to optimize the intensities of the ε-Fe2O3 magnetic recording layer. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOLLY RICKMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-1514. The examiner can normally be reached Mon, Tues, Thurs, 9am - 3pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Ruthkosky can be reached at 571-272-1291. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Holly Rickman/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1785
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 14, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603108
MAGNETIC TAPE, MAGNETIC TAPE CARTRIDGE, AND MAGNETIC TAPE APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12555602
MAGNETIC DISK SUBSTRATE AND MAGNETIC DISK USING MAGNETIC DISK SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12537228
LAMINATED ALL-SOLID SECONDARY CELL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12525609
SILICON-NANOGRAPHITE AEROGEL-BASED ANODES FOR BATTERIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12444693
ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE SHIELDING DEVICE COMPRISING A FLAME RETARDING, THERMAL INTERFACE MATERIAL COMPOSITE, AND METHOD FOR PREPARATION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 14, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+23.3%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 571 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month