Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/449,631

WORKING MACHINE WITH SENSOR MAINTENANCE SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 14, 2023
Priority
Aug 15, 2022 — provisional 63/398,174
Examiner
CHERRY, EUNCHA P
Art Unit
3645
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kubota Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
933 granted / 1061 resolved
+35.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1075
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
56.9%
+16.9% vs TC avg
§102
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1061 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: it appears that the enclosure “320” should be changed to “20” in the paragraph [0025]. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 6, 11, 12 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ina et al (US 2019/0100171 A1). Regarding claim 1, Ina discloses an apparatus comprising: a working machine (Fig. 1 and para 32 “vehicle S”) to perform one or more work tasks (capturing images from para 33 “captured image of the rear of the vehicle S”), wherein the working machine (vehicle S) includes a transportation system (car cabin) and one or more implements (attaching camera 1 from para 32 “onboard camera 1 serving as an onboard optical sensor is arranged on the back door Ba”) to perform the one or more work tasks (capturing image); wherein the working machine (vehicle S) includes a perception system to generate a display for an operator of the working machine or map an environment based data collected by one or more sensors on the working machine, or wherein motorized components of the transportation system or the one or more implements are driven by actuators controlled autonomously or semi- autonomously, based on the collected data, to perform the one or more work tasks (para 33 “As shown in FIG. 1, when, for example, a shift lever SL of a transmission is operated to a reverse position, the onboard camera 1 transmits a captured image of the rear of the vehicle S to a display DSP in the vehicle so that the display DSP shows the captured image”); a sensor assembly (Figs. 2 and 3, and para 32 “onboard camera 1 serving as an onboard optical sensor”) having a housing defining an environmentally isolated cavity (inside of 1) with at least one of the one or more sensors (onboard camera 1 contains an onboard sensor as supported in para 32) contained therein, the sensor assembly further including: a signal-permeable material (“lens surface 3” in the front face of 1) having an interior surface (inside of 1) and an exterior surface (outside of 1), the interior surface defining part of the environmentally isolated cavity (interior surface is the environmentally isolated cavity, see 1); and a body (body of para 34 “first nozzle unit 5”; body of 7) to passively divert the water and/or debris away from the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material, at least part the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material inset with respect to a part of the body (the body of first nozzle unit 5 passively divert any foreign materials on lens surface 3); one or more devices (Fig. 3 and para 34 “cleaning liquid ejection port 4”; para 36 “air ejection port 7”) to generate a barrier (para 34 “cleaning liquid 6”; para 36 air or fluid from “fluid ejection port”) over part of the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material (lens surface 3), wherein the actively generated barrier repeals particulate from at least part of the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material (the cleaning liquid repeals particulate from the exterior surface of lens surface 3). Regarding claim 2, the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the body (body of 7) comprises an overhanging lip (see the overhanging lip of 7 as shown in Fig. 5) above the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material (Fig. 3, the exterior surface of lens surface 3), wherein a top of the overhanging lip diverts the water and/or debris (the lip diverts the water and/or debris), and wherein the one or more devices include one or more fluid output ports located on an underside of the overhanging lip (at least air ejection port 7 is located on an underside of overhanging lip shown in Fig. 5). Regarding claim 3, the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the body (Fig. 8, the body of 7) defines a channel having an ingress to receive the water and/or debris and an egress to release the water and/or debris away from the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material (the channel at 10 can retain any water and/or debris and prevent the water and/or debris from the exterior surface of lens surface 3). Regarding claim 4, the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the actively generated barrier comprises an gas barrier (air form air ejection port 7) and the one or more devices include one or more fluid ports to output gas of the gas barrier (fluid from cleaning liquid ejection port 4). Regarding claim 6, the apparatus of claim 1, wherein a first side of the body passively diverts the water and/or debris away from the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material (top surfaces of 5 and 7 passively diverts the water and/or debris away from the exterior surface of lens surface 3), wherein the body comprises a second different side including one or more cleaning ports to output a solvent or other fluid on the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material during a cleaning cycle (bottom surfaces of 5 and 7 include cleaning ports 4 and 7 to output a solvent or other fluid on the exterior surface of lens surface 3). Regarding claim 11, Ina discloses a sensor assembly (Figs. 2 and 3, and para 32 “onboard camera 1 serving as an onboard optical sensor”) for a working machine (Fig. 1 and para 32 “vehicle S”), the sensor assembly comprising: at least one sensor (onboard camera 1 contains an onboard sensor as supported in para 32) to collect at least a portion of data driving a perception system of the working machine or driving autonomously or semi-autonomously control of actuators of the working machine (para 33 “As shown in FIG. 1, when, for example, a shift lever SL of a transmission is operated to a reverse position, the onboard camera 1 transmits a captured image of the rear of the vehicle S to a display DSP in the vehicle so that the display DSP shows the captured image”); a housing (Fig. 3, inside of 1) defining an environmentally isolated cavity containing the at least one sensor (onboard camera 1 contains an onboard sensor as supported in para 32), the housing comprising: a signal-permeable material (“lens surface 3” in the front face of 1) having an interior surface (inside of 1) and an exterior surface (outside of 1), the interior surface defining part of the environmentally isolated cavity (interior surface is the environmentally isolated cavity, see 1); a body (body of para 34 “first nozzle unit 5”; body of 7) to passively divert the water and/or debris away from the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material, at least part the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material inset with respect to a part of the body (the body of first nozzle unit 5 passively divert any foreign materials on lens surface 3); and one or more devices (Fig. 3 and para 34 “cleaning liquid ejection port 4”; para 36 “air ejection port 7”) to generate a barrier (para 34 “cleaning liquid 6”; para 36 air or fluid from “fluid ejection port”) over part of the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material (lens surface 3), wherein the actively generated barrier repeals particulate from at least part of the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material (the cleaning liquid repeals particulate from the exterior surface of lens surface 3). Regarding claim 12 the apparatus of claim 11, wherein the actively generated barrier comprises an gas barrier (air form air ejection port 7) and the one or more devices include one or more fluid ports to output gas of the gas barrier (fluid from cleaning liquid ejection port 4). Regarding claim 14, the apparatus of claim 11, wherein a first side of the body passively diverts the water and/or debris away from the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material (top surfaces of 5 and 7 passively diverts the water and/or debris away from the exterior surface of lens surface 3), wherein the body comprises a second different side including one or more cleaning ports to output a solvent or other fluid on the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material during a cleaning cycle (bottom surfaces of 5 and 7 include cleaning ports 4 and 7 to output a solvent or other fluid on the exterior surface of lens surface 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 5 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ina et al (US 2019/0100171 A1) in view of Mazumder (US 2013/0263393 A1). Ina discloses the claimed invention as set forth above except for wherein the actively generated barrier comprises an electrostatic barrier and the one or more devices include one or more electrodes to generate the electrostatic static barrier. Mazumder discloses the actively generated barrier comprises an electrostatic barrier and the one or more devices include one or more electrodes to generate the electrostatic static barrier (para 8 “when the electrodes are activated by phased voltage, the dust particles on the surface of the film become electrostatically charged and are removed by the alternating electric field. Over 90% of deposited dust can be removed within minutes, using a very small fraction of the energy produced by the panels. No water or mechanical action is involved. Also described are processes for manufacturing self-cleaning solar panels and concentrators, with emphasis on scalability, durability and on large-scale production cost”). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention before the effective filing date to the actively generated barrier comprises an electrostatic barrier and the one or more devices include one or more electrodes to generate the electrostatic static barrier as taught by Mazumder for the purpose of providing barriers that use a very small fraction of energy (para 8). Claims 7-10 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ina et al (US 2019/0100171 A1) in view of Frederick et al (US 2020/0047717 A1). Regarding claims 7 and 15, Ina discloses the claimed invention as set forth above except for further comprising circuitry to detect signal degradation of a signal collected by the at least one sensor and initiate the cleaning cycle in response to the detected signal degradation. Frederick discloses a circuitry to detect signal degradation of a signal collected by the at least one sensor and initiate the cleaning cycle in response to the detected signal degradation (para 43 “a pre-determined signal quality degradation level is usually defined as the signal quality threshold of a sensor below which the field of view of the sensor is affected and the normal operation of the sensor is not guaranteed. Once the signal quality of the sensor is below its pre-determined signal quality threshold, a cleaning program will be initiated and the processing circuitry will propose a cleaning plan based on the collected real-time weather data and the estimated features of the obstructions. Following approval of the proposed cleaning plan, a cleaning system will clean the obstructions according to the proposed cleaning plan”). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention before the effective filing date to further comprising circuitry to detect signal degradation of a signal collected by the at least one sensor and initiate the cleaning cycle in response to the detected signal degradation as taught by Frederick for the purpose of obtaining a clear view of vehicle surrounding. Regarding claim 8, in combination, Frederick discloses a circuitry to detect one or more characteristics of contaminant attached to the exterior surface of the signal-permeable material, wherein the cleaning cycle is based on the one or more detected characteristics (para 43 “a pre-determined signal quality degradation level is usually defined as the signal quality threshold of a sensor below which the field of view of the sensor is affected and the normal operation of the sensor is not guaranteed. Once the signal quality of the sensor is below its pre-determined signal quality threshold, a cleaning program will be initiated and the processing circuitry will propose a cleaning plan based on the collected real-time weather data and the estimated features of the obstructions. Following approval of the proposed cleaning plan, a cleaning system will clean the obstructions according to the proposed cleaning plan”). Regarding claim 9, in combination, Frederick discloses wherein the at least one sensor located in the cavity (Fig. 4 “sensor system 404”) is used to detect the one or more characteristics of the attached debris (see Figs 2 and 3 “obstructions detection”). Regarding claim 10, Ina in view of Frederick discloses the claimed invention as set forth above except for wherein the one or more sensors include at least one sensor located outside the cavity, wherein the at least one sensor located outside the cavity is used to detect the one or more characteristics of the attached contaminant. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention before the effective filing date to add one or more sensors located outside the cavity to increase the monitoring and managing the cleanliness vehicle surrounding. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EUNCHA P CHERRY whose telephone number is (571)272-2310. The examiner can normally be reached M to F 7am to 3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Pinping Sun can be reached at (571) 270-1284. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. 6/11/2026 /EUNCHA P CHERRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 14, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681294
PROJECTION APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681265
OPTICAL INSTRUMENT POSITIONING DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673611
HIDDEN MIRROR TETHER
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12655014
DIRECT DRIVE MEMS SCANNING MICROMIRROR
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12656598
Optical Filter Wavelength Tuning Using Raised Cosine Control Signal
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.5%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1061 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month