Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/450,425

EXPANSION TANK FOR A COOLING SYSTEM, AS WELL AS A COOLING SYSTEM FOR AN ELECTRIC TRACTION MACHINE FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Aug 16, 2023
Examiner
GONZALEZ QUINONES, JOSE A
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
dr ing h c f porsche aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
871 granted / 1148 resolved
+7.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1182
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
63.0%
+23.0% vs TC avg
§102
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1148 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of claims 2-14 be rejoined and submitted a new claim 15 in the reply filed on 09/23/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that new claim 15, which is a linking claim, overlaps in scope with claim 1, which is directed to the elected invention, inasmuch as both claims 1 and 15 recite an expansion tank. Furthermore, claims 3-5 and 8-14 depend from new claim 15 and therefore overlap in scope with claim 1. Claim 15 also links with claim 2, making no two- way distinctiveness to any claim. Accordingly, it is respectfully submitted that a restriction requirement between claims 1 and 2-15 is not proper under MPEP PNG media_image1.png 17 7 media_image1.png Greyscale 806.05(j). Moreover, there would be no additional search burden for claim 2, due to those features appearing in linking claim 15. This is not found persuasive because the new claim 15 combines features of Invention I (claim 1, elected: expansion tank) and Invention II (Claims 2-14, non-elected : cooling system for an traction system). The examiner will consider it improperly overlaps both restricted Inventions. This would violate MPEP 821.04. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim 2-14 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected Invention II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 09/23/2025. Applicant is reminded that upon the cancellation of claims to a non-elected invention, the inventorship must be corrected in compliance with 37 CFR 1.48(a) if one or more of the currently named inventors is no longer an inventor of at least one claim remaining in the application. A request to correct inventorship under 37 CFR 1.48(a) must be accompanied by an application data sheet in accordance with 37 CFR 1.76 that identifies each inventor by his or her legal name and by the processing fee required under 37 CFR 1.17(i). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim Objections Claim 15 is improper under MPEP 821.04, and it is nonresponsive to the restriction requirement as it includes subject matter from both Invention I (claim 1, elected: expansion tank) and Invention II (Claims 2-14, non-elected : cooling system for an traction system) and the applicant must amend the claim 15 to be limited to the elected invention or cancel it. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 11/23/2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vollmer (DE102009001871) in view of Hwekin (US PG Pub 2010/0132817). As to independent claim 1, Vollmer teaches an expasion tank for a cooling system comprising: at least one inlet for a coolant oil (see annotated figure 1); a first outlet for the coolant oil (see annotated figure 1); a second outlet for a gas (7.1); and a connecting channel (see annotated figure 1) between the at least one inlet (see annotated figure 1) and the first and second outlets (see annotated figure 1), wherein, by a horizontal offset, one of the inlets (see annotated figure 1) for the coolant oil and the second outlet (7.1) for a gas are always arranged above the first outlet (see annotated figure 1) for the coolant oil in an installation situation in any operating state asshown in figure 1 However Vollmer teaches the claimed limiation as discussed above except wherein a filter medium for removing particles and/or water from the coolant oil is provided between the at least one inlet and the first outlet. Hwekin teaches a filter medium (11) for removing particles and/or water from the coolant is provided between the at least one inlet (62) and the first outlet (64) as shown in figure 2, for the advantageous benefit of removing a portion of the particulate contaminants from the coolant even when the coolant filter is blocked while ensuring simple construction and reduced cost. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to modify Koyama et al. in view of Vollmer by using said a filter medium for removing particles and/or water from the coolant oil is provided between the at least one inlet and the first outlet, as taught by Hwekin, to remove a portion of the particulate contaminants from the coolant even when the coolant filter is blocked while ensuring simple construction and reduced cost. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSE A GONZALEZ QUINONES whose telephone number is (571)270-7850. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 6:30-2:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, OLUSEYE IWARERE can be reached at (571)270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSE A GONZALEZ QUINONES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834 October 16, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 16, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Jan 07, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 08, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592595
ELECTRIC MOTOR WITH AXIAL AND RADIAL PERMANENT MAGNETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592601
MOTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587068
ELECTRIC MOTOR COOLING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583593
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OIL MAINTENANCE IN GEARBOXES FOR eVTOL AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580434
ROTOR FOR ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ROTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+12.4%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1148 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month