Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/450,941

SYSTEMS, APPARATUSES, AND METHODS FOR APPLYING A COATING LAYER TO A MEDICAL IMPLANT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 16, 2023
Priority
Oct 26, 2022 — provisional 63/419,504
Examiner
SPENCER, MAXIMILIAN TOBIAS
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Abbott Laboratories
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
31%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
62%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 31% of cases
31%
Career Allowance Rate
20 granted / 65 resolved
-39.2% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
112
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
96.0%
+56.0% vs TC avg
§102
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 65 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Claims 1, 4, 8, 10-12 and 39 in the reply filed on 05/14/2026 is acknowledged. Status of Claims Claims 1, 4, 8, 10-12, 14, 15, 28, 29, and 39-48 are pending and examined below. Claim Objections Regarding claims 14 and 47, the claims read “a thickness of approximately 5 to approximately 200 nm”. Please correct these claims to instead read ““a thickness of approximately 5 nm to approximately 200 nm” for consistency. Regarding claim 39, the claim reads “a thickness of approximately 10 to approximately 20 nm”. Please correct this to read ““a thickness of approximately 10 nm to approximately 20 nm” for consistency. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, 8, 10-12, 14, 15, 28, 29, 40-43, 45-47 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US 2011/0093056 (Kaplan) Regarding claim 1, Kaplan discloses a medical implant comprising: an implant scaffold body (Fig. 1b) a layer deposited on the implant scaffold body (¶0043, “tie layer”), the layer being a plasma polymerized polymer layer (¶0043, “plasma polymerization may be used to polymerize the tie layer onto a stent surface”) Regarding claim 4, Kaplan disclose wherein the layer comprises Poly(L-lactide) (PLLA), Poly(D,L-lactide) (PDLLA), polycaprolactone (PCL), polyglycolide (PGA), poly(trimethylene carbonate), polydioxanone, or copolymers or mixtures thereof (¶0051, “poly(l-lactic acid)) Regarding claim 8, Kaplan discloses wherein the layer comprises a polymer comprising five methylene groups in its monomer structure (¶0051, “poly(ε-caprolactone)” Regarding claim 10, Kaplan discloses wherein the layer is a primer layer (¶0043, wherein “tie layer” corresponds to a primer layer”), a coating layer formed on a primer layer (¶0043, “therapeutic agent is deposited onto the tie layer”), or a combination of a primer layer and coating layer Regarding claim 11, Kaplan discloses wherien the coating layer comprises a therapeutic agent (¶0043, “therapeutic agent is deposited onto the tie layer”) Regarding claim 12, Kaplan discloses wherein the therapeutic agent is everolimus, rapamycin, or another olumus-based drug (¶0052, “rapamycin”) Regarding claim 14, Kaplan discloses wherein the layer is a bioresorbable layer (¶0050, “bioerodible polymers”) having a thickness of about 5nm to about 50nm (¶0047, wherein “about 100Å to about 300Å” is equivalent to 10nm to 30nm – which falls within the claimed range) Regarding claim 15, Kaplan discloses wherein the bioresorbable layer (¶0050, “bioerodible polymers”) has a thickness of about 10nm to about 20nm (¶0047, wherein about 100Å to about 300Å is equivalent to 10nm to 30nm) Regarding claim 28, Kaplan discloses wherein the layer (¶0028, “tie layer”) is synthesized directly on the medical implant (¶0028, “plasma polymerized tie layer may be applied to stent”) Regarding claim 29, Kaplan discloses wherein the medical implant is at least one of a stent or a filter (Fig. 1B, stent 32) Regarding claim 40, Kaplan discloses wherein the layer has a thickness of about 10nm (¶0047, wherein about 100Å to about 300Å is equivalent to about 10nm to about 30nm) Regarding claim 41, Kaplan discloses wherein the layer is bioresorbable or bioabsorbable (¶0011, “bioerodible”) Regarding claim 42, Kaplan discloses wherein the layer is formed from a monomer (¶0045, wherein “methane” corresponds to a monomer) dissolved in a solvent to form the plasma polymerized polymer layer (¶0047, “carrier solvent”) Regarding claim 43, Kaplan discloses wherein the solvent comprises an aqueous solvent, an organic solvent, a liquid monomer, or combinations or mixtures thereof (¶0054, wherein “acetone” corresponds to an organic solvent”) Regarding claim 45, Kaplan discloses wherein the layer comprises a ring opened polymer (¶0051, wherein “poly(ε-caprolactone)” corresponds to a ring-opened polymer) Regarding claim 46, Kaplan discloses wherein the layer comprises a primer layer (¶0043, “tie layer”) and a coating layer (¶0043, “therapeutic agent in a polymer matrix”) Regarding claim 47, Kaplan discloses a medical implant comprising: an implant scaffold body (Fig. 1B); a primer layer deposited on the implant scaffold body, the primer layer being a plasma polymerized polymer layer, the primer layer having a thickness of approximately 5 to approximately 200 nm (¶0047, wherein about 100Å to about 300Å is equivalent to about 10nm to about 30nm – this overlaps the claimed thickness) wherein the primer layer comprises Poly(L-lactide) (PLLA), Poly(D,L-lactide) (PDLLA), polycaprolactone (PCL), polyglycolide (PGA), poly(trimethylene carbonate), polydioxanone, or copolymers or mixtures thereof (¶0051, “poly(l-lactic acid)); and a coating layer applied directly on the primer layer, wherein the coating layer comprises a therapeutic agent (¶0043, “therapeutic agent is deposited onto the tie layer”); wherein the medical implant is at least one of a stent or a filter (Fig. 1b, stent 32) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 39, 44, and 48 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2011/0093056 (Kaplan) in view of US 2006/0093771 (Rypacek) Regarding claim 39. Kaplan discloses wherein the layer is a primer layer (¶0043, “tie layer”), the primer layer having a thickness of approximately 10 to approximately 20 nm (¶0047, wherein “about 100Å to about 300Å” is equivalent to 10nm to 30nm – which touches the claimed range) a coating layer applied directly on the primer layer, wherein the coating layer comprises a therapeutic agent (¶0043, “therapeutic agent is deposited onto the tie layer”) Kaplan discloses a primer layer but doesn't explicitly teach or disclose wherein the primer layer comprises a Poly(D,L-lactide) (PDLLA), and Polycaprolactone (PCL) copolymer. Rypacek discloses a primer layer comprising a Poly(D,L-lactide) (PDLLA), and Polycaprolactone (PCL) copolymer (¶0349, a copolymer poly(D,L-lactide-co-6-caprolactone with an LA/CL ratio 90/10, i.e. P(DLLA90CL10)) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the primer layer of Kaplan to comprise a PDLLA and PCL copolymer, as taught by Rypacek, in order to control the biologically active agent release from the polymer matrix (¶0084) Regarding claim 44, Kaplan doesn't explicitly teach or disclose a solvent comprising caprolactone (CL), dioxanone, or combinations or mixture thereof Rypacek discloses a solvent comprising caprolactone (CL), dioxanone, or combinations or mixture thereof (¶0349, wherein the copolymer is dissolved in a 0.3% dioxanone) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to dissolve the monomer of Kaplan in a solvent comprising caprolactone (CL), dioxanone, or combinations or mixture thereof, as taught by Rypacek, in order to form a homogenous mixture with the monomer. Regarding claim 48, Kaplan discloses a primer layer (see rejection of claim 47) but doesn't explicitly teach or disclose wherein the primer layer comprises a Poly(D,L-lactide) (PDLLA), and Polycaprolactone (PCL) copolymer. Rypacek discloses a Poly(D,L-lactide) (PDLLA), and Polycaprolactone (PCL) copolymer (¶0349, a copolymer poly(D,L-lactide-co-6-caprolactone with an LA/CL ratio 90/10, i.e. P(DLLA90CL10) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the layer of Kaplan with a solvent comprising caprolactone, dioxanone, or combinations or mixture thereof, as taught by Rypacek, in order to function as a drug diffusion barrier (¶0346) Conclusion Included below is relevant prior art that was considered but not relied upon for this office action: 2007/0071879 – Rypacek family US 6,939,376 - discloses polymers used for the second polymer / therapeutic layer 2023/0039005 – ¶0091 discloses PLLA-co-PCL and PDLLA coating Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAXIMILIAN TOBIAS SPENCER whose telephone number is (571)272-8382. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jerrah Edwards can be reached on 408.918.7557. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAXIMILIAN TOBIAS SPENCER/Examiner, Art Unit 3774 /YASHITA SHARMA/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 16, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667472
METHOD AND SYSTEM TO ACTIVATE LIMB MOVEMENT IN AMPUTEES
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12636169
PROSTHETIC FOOT
3y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12616590
ASSISTIVE DEVICE WITH HYBRID CONTROL SYSTEMS
3y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12508010
Medical Devices for Repairing Perforations in Tissue, Methods of Manufacturing Medical Devices, and Methods of Implanting a Medical Device
4y 8m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12370066
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR RESISTIVE TORQUE CONTROL IN A MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL ACTUATOR USING A RECOVERY PULSE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 29, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
31%
Grant Probability
62%
With Interview (+30.9%)
3y 1m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 65 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month