Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/451,110

METHOD OF COMMUNICATION OPERATION PERFORMED BY USER EQUIPMENT AND APPARATUS USING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Aug 17, 2023
Priority
Aug 19, 2022 — provisional 63/399,221
Examiner
GHOWRWAL, OMAR J
Art Unit
2463
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
698 granted / 824 resolved
+26.7% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
854
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
80.4%
+40.4% vs TC avg
§102
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 824 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The claims in this application are given their broadest reasonable interpretation using the plain meaning of the claim language in light of the specification as it would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim element (also commonly referred to as a claim limitation) is limited by the description in the specification when 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is invoked. As explained in MPEP § 2181, subsection I, claim limitations that meet the following three-prong test will be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: (A) the claim limitation uses the term “means” or “step” or a term used as a substitute for “means” that is a generic placeholder (also called a nonce term or a non-structural term having no specific structural meaning) for performing the claimed function; (B) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is modified by functional language, typically, but not always linked by the transition word “for” (e.g., “means for”) or another linking word or phrase, such as “configured to” or “so that”; and (C) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is not modified by sufficient structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function. Use of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim with functional language creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites sufficient structure, material, or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Absence of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is not to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is not interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites function without reciting sufficient structure, material or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Claim limitations in this application that use the word “means” (or “step”) are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. Conversely, claim limitations in this application that do not use the word “means” (or “step”) are not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. None of the instant claims invoke U.S.C. 112(f). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 24 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential structural cooperative relationships of elements, such omission amounting to a gap between the necessary structural connections. See MPEP § 2172.01. The omitted structural cooperative relationships are: it is unclear what structure of the apparatus performs the receiving functional language. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 9, 11-14, 16, 18, 20-26, 28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Publication No. 2021/0006372 A1 to CHA et al. (“Cha”) [provided by Applicant]. As to claims 1-2, 11, see similar rejections to claims 23-24, 28, respectively. The apparatus teaches the methods. As to claim 3, Cha further discloses the method of claim 2, further comprising: resetting or restarting the first operation after receiving the first indicator (para. 0147, for each CSI-RS resource setting, the UE transmits CSI reporting (i.e. this reporting occurs repeatedly) indicated by CSI-ReportConfigs associated with the CSI-RS resource setting to the BS.). As to claim 4, Cha further discloses the method of claim 2 (see rejection to claim 2), wherein the first mode is set to be a default mode if the first indicator is not received (Examiner notes: this instance of “if” is a conditional limitation, which is not required for the invention to function, and therefore the limitations are not given patentable weight in a method claim; see MPEP 2111.04). As to claim 9, Cha further discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the first set of resource is associated with a first mode or more than one modes (para. 0113, The CSI-RS resource set list may include at least one of an NZP CSI-RS resource set list, a CSI-IM resource set list, or a CSI-SSB resource set list.). As to claim 12, Cha further discloses the method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving a second set of resource comprising at least one resource (para. 0113, CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set, a CSI-IM resource set, or a CSI-SSB resource set, i.e. any of these being a second set), wherein the second set of resource is configured via the configuration (para. 0109, RRC signaling); and performing a second operation, wherein the second operation is related to the second set of resource (para. 0147, for each CSI-RS resource setting, the UE transmits CSI reporting). As to claim 13, Cha further discloses the method of claim 12, wherein the second set of resource is associated with a second mode or more than one modes (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information may be expressed as a CSI-ResourceConfig information element (IE)). As to claim 14, Cha further discloses the method of claim 12, further comprising: receiving a second indicator (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information may be expressed as a CSI-ResourceConfig information element (IE), i.e. “second” being a numbering convention, not necessarily different than the first), wherein the second indicator comprises a second mode (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set, a CSI-IM resource set, or a CSI-SSB resource set.). As to claim 16, Cha further discloses the method of claim 12, wherein the second operation is performed according to a second set of threshold, wherein the second set of threshold is related to a second mode (para. 0145-0147, Regarding a CQI, PMI, CSI-RS resource indicator (CRI), SS/PBCH block resource indicator (SSBRI), layer indicator (LI), RI, or L1-RSRP, the UE receives RRC signaling including N(≥1) [i.e. threshold] CSI-ReportConfig reporting settings [i.e. mode], M(≥1) [i.e. threshold] CSI-ResourceConfig resource settings [i.e. mode]….or each CSI-RS resource setting, the UE transmits CSI reporting (i.e. first operation) indicated by CSI-ReportConfigs associated with the CSI-RS resource setting to the BS; i.e. “second” being a numbering convention, not necessarily different from the first). As to claim 18, Cha further discloses the method of claim 2, wherein the first mode is derived by a first indication wherein the first indication comprises a first search space configuration, a first search space set index, a first CORESET ID, a first TCI state, or a first spatial adaptation pattern (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set, a CSI-IM resource set, or a CSI-SSB resource set; para. 0378, the SS/PBCH block, CSI-RS, and/or PRS corresponding to the configured or indicated ID or index may be configured or indicated as a spatial QCL reference for PRS resources, so that the UE may be aware of information about the direction of a Tx beam of the PRS transmitted ). As to claim 20, Cha further discloses the method of claim 12 (see rejection to claim 12), further comprising: performing the second operation according to a second search space set configuration, wherein the second search space set configuration comprises a second search space set index, a second CORESET ID, a second periodicity, a second offset, a second number of monitoring symbol(s), a second set of DCI format(s), a second set of aggregation level(s) for PDCCH monitoring, and a second set of candidate number per aggregation level for PDCCH monitoring (nrofCandidates), if the second operation is PDCCH monitoring/detection, wherein the second search space set configuration is related to a second mode (Examiner notes: this instance of “if” is a conditional limitation, which is not required for the invention to function, and therefore the limitations are not given patentable weight in a method claim; see MPEP 2111.04). As to claim 21, Cha further discloses the method of claim 14, wherein the second mode is derived by a second indication wherein the second indication comprises a second search space configuration, a second search space set index, a second CORESET ID , a second TCI state, or a second spatial adaptation pattern (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set, a CSI-IM resource set, or a CSI-SSB resource set; para. 0378, the SS/PBCH block, CSI-RS, and/or PRS corresponding to the configured or indicated ID or index may be configured or indicated as a spatial QCL reference for PRS resources, so that the UE may be aware of information about the direction of a Tx beam of the PRS transmitted; i.e. “second” being a numbering convention, not necessarily different from the first). As to claim 22, Cha further discloses the method of claim 12 (see rejection to claim 12), further comprising: performing the second operation according to a second CORESET configuration wherein the second CORESET configuration comprises a second CORESET ID, a second set of frequency domain resource, and a second TCI state if the second operation is PDCCH monitoring/detection, wherein the second CORESET configuration is related to a second mode (Examiner notes: this instance of “if” is a conditional limitation, which is not required for the invention to function, and therefore the limitations are not given patentable weight in a method claim; see MPEP 2111.04). As to claim 23, Cha discloses an apparatus for a communication operation (fig. 8, para. 0109-0116, UE), the apparatus comprising: one or more receivers (fig. 30, transceiver(s)); one or more transmitters (fig. 30, transceiver(s)); a memory storing instructions (fig. 30, memory unit); and a processor (fig. 30, control unit…processor(s)) executing the instructions, wherein execution of the instructions by the processor causes the processor to (para. 0445, in the embodiments according to the present specification, when the memory 94 is executed by at least one processor, such as the processor 93, the memory 94 allows the processor 93 to perform some or all of the processes controlled by the processor 93 of FIG. 32 or stores software code 95 including instructions for performing the embodiments described in this specification): receive a configuration, wherein the configuration comprises a resource setting (para. 0109-0112, the UE receives configuration information related to CSI from the BS through RRC signaling; The CSI related configuration information may include at least one of CSI-interference management (IM) resource related information; The CSI-IM resource related information may include CSI-IM resource information, CSI-IM resource set information); receive a first set of resource comprising at least one resource, wherein the first set of resource is configured via the configuration (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information may be expressed as a CSI-ResourceConfig information element (IE). The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set, a CSI-IM resource set, or a CSI-SSB resource set. That is, the CSI resource configuration related information includes a CSI-RS resource set list. The CSI-RS resource set list may include at least one of an NZP CSI-RS resource set list, a CSI-IM resource set list, or a CSI-SSB resource set list. The CSI-RS resource set is identified by a CSI-RS resource set ID, and one resource set includes at least one CSI-RS resource. Each CSI-RS resource is identified by a CSI-RS resource ID.); and perform a first operation, wherein the first operation is related to the first set of resource (para. 0116-0117, (1) receiving a CSI-RS by the UE (S805) and (2) computing the CSI based on the received CSI-RS (S807). For the CSI-RS, RE mapping of CSI-RS resources is configured in time and frequency domains by an RRC parameter CSI-RS-ResourceMapping. The UE reports the measured CSI to the BS (S809)). As to claim 24, Cha further discloses the apparatus of claim 23, wherein the apparatus further receives a first indicator (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information may be expressed as a CSI-ResourceConfig information element (IE)), wherein the first indicator comprises a first mode (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set, a CSI-IM resource set, or a CSI-SSB resource set.). As to claim 25, Cha further discloses the apparatus of claim 24, wherein the first mode comprises a first indication of power value (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set), a first indication of power level (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set), a first indication of antenna port number, a first indication of antenna port subset, a first indication of antenna element number, a first indication of antenna element subset, a first Cell-ID, a first search space (SS) set index, a first control resource set (CORESET) identity (ID), a first search space configuration, or a first transmission configuration indication (TCI) state. As to claim 26, Cha further discloses the apparatus of claim 24, wherein the first mode comprises a first spatial adaptation pattern, wherein the first spatial adaptation pattern comprises a first indication of power value (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set), a first indication of power level (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set), a first indication of antenna port number, a first indication of antenna port subset, a first indication of antenna element number, a first indication of antenna element subset, a first Cell-ID, a first SS set index, a first CORESET ID, a first search space configuration, or a first TCI state. As to claim 28, Cha further discloses the apparatus of claim 23, wherein the first operation is performed according to a first set of threshold, wherein the first set of threshold is related to a first mode (para. 0145-0147, Regarding a CQI, PMI, CSI-RS resource indicator (CRI), SS/PBCH block resource indicator (SSBRI), layer indicator (LI), RI, or L1-RSRP, the UE receives RRC signaling including N(≥1) [i.e. threshold] CSI-ReportConfig reporting settings [i.e. mode], M(≥1) [i.e. threshold] CSI-ResourceConfig resource settings [i.e. mode]….or each CSI-RS resource setting, the UE transmits CSI reporting (i.e. first operation) indicated by CSI-ReportConfigs associated with the CSI-RS resource setting to the BS). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 5-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Publication No. 2021/0006372 A1 to CHA et al. (“Cha”) [provided by Applicant] in view of U.S. Publication No. 2023/0209538 A1 to Cirik et al. (“Cirik”) [provided by Applicant]. As to claim 5, Cha further discloses the method of claim 2, wherein the first mode comprises a first indication of power value (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set), a first indication of power level (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set). Cha does not expressly disclose a first indication of antenna port number, a first indication of antenna port subset, a first indication of antenna element number, a first indication of antenna element subset, a first Cell-ID, a first search space (SS) set index, a first control resource set (CORESET) identity (ID), a first search space configuration, and a first transmission configuration indication (TCI) state. Cirik at para. 0588, 0598, 0599 discloses the wireless device may monitor, via the CORESET, for PDCCH transmissions/receptions using/with a spatial domain reception/receiving filter that may be determined based on a reference signal indicated by the common/unified TCI state. DMRS antenna port(s) of the PDCCH transmissions/receptions may be quasi co-located with a reference signal indicated by the common/unified TCI state. One or more configuration parameters may indicate a plurality of search space set indexes/identifiers (e.g., provided by a higher layer parameter searchSpaceld) for the plurality of search space sets. The one or more configuration parameters may indicate the CORESET (and/or a CORESET index of the CORESET) for the search space set, and at paras. 0061, 0122, 0180, 0231: One or more base stations (e.g., the gNBs 160 and/or the ng eNBs 162) may comprise multiple sets of antennas to respectively control multiple cells (or sectors). A physical cell ID may be referred to as a carrier ID, and a cell index may be referred to as a carrier index. The base station may send/transmit, to the wireless device, one or more RRC messages comprising configuration parameters of one or more CORESETs and one or more search space sets. The configuration parameters may indicate an association between a search space set and a CORESET. A TCI state of the plurality of TCI states may indicate a reference signal for quasi-colocation of/for DM-RS (or DM-RS antenna port(s)) of the PDCCH transmissions/receptions. Prior to the effective filing date of invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate the various elements as taught by Cirik into the invention of Cha. The suggestion/motivation would have been to increase efficiency (Cirik, para. 0004). Including the various elements as taught by Cirik into the invention of Cha was within the ordinary ability of one of ordinary skill in the art based on the teachings of Cirik. As to claim 6, Cha further discloses the method of claim 2, wherein the first mode comprises a first spatial adaptation pattern (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set, a CSI-IM resource set, or a CSI-SSB resource set; para. 0378, the SS/PBCH block, CSI-RS, and/or PRS corresponding to the configured or indicated ID or index may be configured or indicated as a spatial QCL reference for PRS resources, so that the UE may be aware of information about the direction of a Tx beam of the PRS transmitted ), wherein the first spatial adaptation pattern comprises a first indication of power value (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set), a first indication of power level (para. 0113, The CSI resource configuration related information defines a group including at least one of a non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource set). Cha does not expressly disclose a first indication of antenna port number, a first indication of antenna port subset, a first indication of antenna element number, a first indication of antenna element subset, a first Cell-ID, a first SS set index, a first CORESET ID, a first search space configuration, and a first TCI state. Cirik at para. 0588, 0598, 0599 discloses the wireless device may monitor, via the CORESET, for PDCCH transmissions/receptions using/with a spatial domain reception/receiving filter that may be determined based on a reference signal indicated by the common/unified TCI state. DMRS antenna port(s) of the PDCCH transmissions/receptions may be quasi co-located with a reference signal indicated by the common/unified TCI state. One or more configuration parameters may indicate a plurality of search space set indexes/identifiers (e.g., provided by a higher layer parameter searchSpaceld) for the plurality of search space sets. The one or more configuration parameters may indicate the CORESET (and/or a CORESET index of the CORESET) for the search space set, and at paras. 0061, 0122, 0180, 0231: One or more base stations (e.g., the gNBs 160 and/or the ng eNBs 162) may comprise multiple sets of antennas to respectively control multiple cells (or sectors). A physical cell ID may be referred to as a carrier ID, and a cell index may be referred to as a carrier index. The base station may send/transmit, to the wireless device, one or more RRC messages comprising configuration parameters of one or more CORESETs and one or more search space sets. The configuration parameters may indicate an association between a search space set and a CORESET. A TCI state of the plurality of TCI states may indicate a reference signal for quasi-colocation of/for DM-RS (or DM-RS antenna port(s)) of the PDCCH transmissions/receptions. Prior to the effective filing date of invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate the various elements as taught by Cirik into the invention of Cha. The suggestion/motivation would have been to increase efficiency (Cirik, para. 0004). Including the various elements as taught by Cirik into the invention of Cha was within the ordinary ability of one of ordinary skill in the art based on the teachings of Cirik. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Publication No. 2021/0006372 A1 to CHA et al. (“Cha”) [provided by Applicant] in view of U.S. Publication No. 2023/0309171 A1 to Zhou et al. (“Zhou”). As to claim 8, Cha does not expressly disclose the method of claim 1, wherein the first set of resource comprises channel state information (CSI) - reference signal (RS) resource, non-zero power (NZP) CSI-RS resource, CSI - interference measurement (IM) resource, synchronization signal (SS), physical broadcast channel (PBCH), BFD-RS, BFR-RS, radio link monitoring RS (RLM-RS), PDCCH, control channel element (CCE), and CORESET. Zhou discloses at para. 0160, the CSI-RS configuration may comprise one or more parameters indicating, for example, up to 32 antenna ports (or any other quantity of antenna ports). The wireless device may be configured to use/employ the same OFDM symbols for a downlink CSI-RS and a CORESET, for example, if the downlink CSI-RS and CORESET are spatially QCLed and resource elements associated with the downlink CSI-RS are outside of the physical resource blocks (PRBs) configured for the CORESET. The wireless device may be configured to use/employ the same OFDM symbols for a downlink CSI-RS and SS/PBCH blocks, for example, if the downlink CSI-RS and SS/PBCH blocks are spatially QCLed and resource elements associated with the downlink CSI-RS are outside of PRBs configured for the SS/PBCH blocks. At para. 0175, BFR, para. 0198, PDCCH, para. 0206, CCE, para. 0236, CSI-RS, CSI-IM, para. 0338, NZP, para. 0368, RLM-RS, para. 0383, BFD. Prior to the effective filing date of invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate the various elements as taught by Zhou into the invention of Cha. The suggestion/motivation would have been to have signal transmission and reception based on measurements of signals (Zhou, para. 0002). Including the various elements as taught by Zhou into the invention of Cha was within the ordinary ability of one of ordinary skill in the art based on the teachings of Cirik. Claim(s) 10, 15, 27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Publication No. 2021/0006372 A1 to CHA et al. (“Cha”) [provided by Applicant] in view of U.S. Publication No. 2023/0097142 A1 to Alfarhan et al. (“Alfarhan”). As to claim 10, see similar rejection to claim 27. The apparatus teaches the method. As to claim 15, Cha does not expressly disclose the method of claim 12, wherein the second operation is performed according to a second set of counter and a second set of timer, wherein the second set of counter and the second set of timer are related to a second mode. Alfarhan discloses at para. 0252-0253: For example, the WTRU 102 may activate a certain CSI reporting pattern, after receiving an activation DCI for an associated DL SPS resource); (6) based on a timer and/or a counter (e.g., expiry of an inactivity time and/or elapsed time since applicable scheduling). Prior to the effective filing date of invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate the activation as taught by Alfarhan into the invention of Cha. The suggestion/motivation would have been to provide reliable channel state information reporting (Alfarhan, para. 0002). Including the activation as taught by Alfarhan into the invention of Cha was within the ordinary ability of one of ordinary skill in the art based on the teachings of Alfarhan. As to claim 27, Cha does not expressly disclose the apparatus of claim 23, wherein the first operation is performed according to a first set of counter and a first set of timer, wherein the first set of counter and the first set of timer are related to a first mode. Alfarhan discloses at para. 0252-0253: For example, the WTRU 102 may activate a certain CSI reporting pattern, after receiving an activation DCI for an associated DL SPS resource); (6) based on a timer and/or a counter (e.g., expiry of an inactivity time and/or elapsed time since applicable scheduling). Prior to the effective filing date of invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate the activation as taught by Alfarhan into the invention of Cha. The suggestion/motivation would have been to provide reliable channel state information reporting (Alfarhan, para. 0002). Including the activation as taught by Alfarhan into the invention of Cha was within the ordinary ability of one of ordinary skill in the art based on the teachings of Alfarhan. Claim(s) 17, 29 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Publication No. 2021/0006372 A1 to CHA et al. (“Cha”) [provided by Applicant] in view of U.S. Publication No. 2024/0031056 A1 to Rastegardoost et al. (“Rastegardoost”). As to claim 17, see similar rejection to claim 29. The apparatus teaches the method. As to claim 29, Cha does not expressly disclose the apparatus of claim 23, wherein the apparatus further performs the first operation according to a first search space set configuration wherein the first search space set configuration comprises a first search space set index, a first CORESET ID, a first periodicity, a first offset, a first number of monitoring symbol(s), a first set of DCI format(s), a first set of aggregation level(s) for PDCCH monitoring, and a first set of candidate number per aggregation level for PDCCH monitoring (nrofCandidates), if the first operation is PDCCH monitoring/detection, wherein the first search space set configuration is related to a first mode. Rastegardoost discloses at para. 0311: The configuration parameters in the RRC message may comprise second parameters indicating an initial DL BWP of the cell. The initial DL BWP may have a first bandwidth comprising a number of RBs. The first bandwidth may be larger than a maximum supported bandwidth of first-type UEs. The initial DL BWP may comprise one or more CORESETs. A CORESET may be associated with one or more search spaces (e.g., CSS). A search space may comprise periodic PDCCH monitoring occasions for receiving one or more DCIs. For example, a search space may be dedicated to first type UEs. For example, a search space may be common/shared between legacy UEs and first type UEs. For example, the second parameters may indicate for the search space: a search space ID, an ID of an associated CORESET, a periodicity and an offset for PDCCH monitoring slots, a duration of the search space (e.g., number of consecutive slots that a search space lasts in every occasion), monitoring symbols within a slot, a number of PDCCH candidates per aggregation level, a search space type (e.g., UE-specific or common), and one or more DCI formats associated with the search space. A DCI format may correspond to a size (e.g., bit length) of DCI. A wireless device may have to perform blind decoding in every PDCCH candidate/monitoring occasion of a search space for receiving DCI(s) corresponding to configured DCI formats. Further, para. 0152 discloses: The UE may estimate a downlink channel state and/or generate a CSI report based on the measuring of the one or more downlink CSI-RSs. The UE may provide the CSI report to the base station. Prior to the effective filing date of invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate the parameters as taught by Rastegardoost into the invention of Cha. The suggestion/motivation would have been to indicate a DL BWP (Rastegardoost, para. 0311). Including the parameters as taught by Rastegardoost into the invention of Cha was within the ordinary ability of one of ordinary skill in the art based on the teachings of Rastegardoost. Claim(s) 19, 30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Publication No. 2021/0006372 A1 to CHA et al. (“Cha”) [provided by Applicant] in view of U.S. Publication No. 2024/0276519 A1 to LEE et al. (“Lee”). As to claim 19, see similar rejection to claim 30. The apparatus teaches the method. As to claim 30, Cha does not expressly disclose the apparatus of claim 23, wherein the apparatus further performs the first operation according to a first CORESET configuration wherein the first CORESET configuration comprises a first CORESET ID, a first set of frequency domain resource, and a first TCI state if the first operation is PDCCH monitoring/detection, wherein the first CORESET configuration is related to a first mode. Lee discloses at para. 0132-0142: CORESET may be configured by RRC Signaling [0133] controlResourceSetId: indicates the ID of a CORESET. [0134] frequency DomainResources: indicates the frequency resources of the CORESET. The frequency resources of the CORESET are indicated by a bitmap in which each bit corresponds to an RBG (e.g., six (consecutive) RBs). For example, the most significant bit (MSB) of the bitmap corresponds to a first RBG. RBGs corresponding to bits set to 1 are allocated as the frequency resources of the CORESET. [0135] duration: indicates the time resources of the CORESET. Duration indicates the number of consecutive OFDM symbols included in the CORESET. Duration has a value of 1 to 3. [0136] cce-REG-MappingType: indicates a control channel element (CCE)-REG mapping type. Interleaved and non-interleaved types are supported. [0137] interleaverSize: indicates an interleaver size. [0138] pdcch-DMRS-ScramblingID: indicates a value used for PDCCH DMRS initialization. When pdcch-DMRS-ScramblingID is not included, the physical cell ID of a serving cell is used. . [0139] precoderGranularity: indicates a precoder granularity in the frequency domain. [0140] reg-BundleSize: indicates an REG bundle size. [0141] tci-PresentInDCI: indicates whether a transmission configuration index (TCI) field is included in DL-related DCI. [0142] tci-StatesPDCCH-ToAddList: indicates a subset of TCI states configured in pdcch-Config, used for providing quasi-co-location (QCL) relationships between DL RS(s) in an RS set (TCI-State) and PDCCH DMRS ports. Furthermore, at para. 0209: The UE receives an NZP CSI-RS resource set IE including a higher layer parameter ‘repetition’ from the gNB through RRC signaling (S610). Here, the repetition parameter is set to ‘ON’. The UE repeatedly receives resource(s) in a CSI-RS resource set in which the repetition parameter is set to ‘ON’ in different OFDM symbols through the same Tx beam (or DL spatial domain transmission filter) of the gNB (S620). Therethrough, the UE determines an Rx beam thereof (S630). Here, the UE performs no CSI report or transmits a CSI report including a CRI/L1-RSRP to the gNB (S640), i.e. the CSI report via RRC signaling is related to the configuration parameters. Prior to the effective filing date of invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate the parameters as taught by Lee into the invention of Cha. The suggestion/motivation would have been to have a method of efficiently performing wireless signal transmission/reception procedures and an apparatus therefor (Lee, para. 0005). Including the parameters as taught by Lee into the invention of Cha was within the ordinary ability of one of ordinary skill in the art based on the teachings of Lee. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 7 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20200314676 A1 at fig. 2 discloses RRC configuration for BFD and RLF using CSI-RS. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OMAR J GHOWRWAL whose telephone number is (571)270-5691. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00am-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ASAD NAWAZ can be reached at 571-272-3988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OMAR J GHOWRWAL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2463
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 17, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684605
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHODS, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICES
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677288
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR REPORTING SEMI-PERSISTENT CHANNEL STATE IN MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677324
USER EQUIPMENT, RADIO NETWORK NODE, AND METHODS PERFORMED IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672062
MEDIUM, METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATION BASED ON PARAMETERS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672150
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING A BANDWIDTH PART
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.3%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 824 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month