Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/451,112

MEMORY MODULE, MEMORY DEVICE AND MEMORY SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 17, 2023
Examiner
YOHA, CONNIE C
Art Unit
2825
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
SK Hynix Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allow Rate
680 granted / 726 resolved
+25.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
735
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§102
51.1%
+11.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 726 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This office acknowledges receipt of the following items from the Applicant: Papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) filed on 8/17/23 was considered. In response to the restriction requirement: Applicant elected Group II, claims 7-14 for examination. Group I and III are non-elected group and are withdrawn from consideration. Specification Title The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Doo et al, Patent Application Publication No. 2017/0117033. With regard to claim 7, Doo discloses a memory device (fig.1, 110), comprising: a plurality of rows (fig. 1, bank 0-3, with plurality of rows corresponding to WL), (page 3, [0043], line 1-13) each accessible by a row address (page 3, [0044]), a counting control circuit (fig. 1, counter 158) configured to activate, according to an active command (fig. 1, CMD), a row selection signal corresponding to the row address (page 4, [0047]); and a partial counting circuit (fig.9A, 156) configured to generate a counting signal (fig. 9A, CNT(0)-(6) via 916) and a carry output signal (fig. 9A, Carry_Out signal) by counting, according to the row selection signal (page 4, [0047), a carry input signal (fig. 9A, PCSC)(page 8, [0098]), provided through a carry input pad (fig. 9A, inherent input pad carry input signal), and provide the carry output signal (fig. 9A, 9A, Carry_Out) signal through a carry output pad (fig. 9A, inherent output pad carry output signal). With regard to claim 8, Doo further discloses a storing circuit (fig. 9A, 810) configured to store the counting signal (fig. 9A, CNT(6:0]) according to the row selection signal; and a data input/output circuit configured to output a signal stored in the storing circuit (fig. 9A, 820) through inherent data pads (page 8, [0101]). With regard claim 9, Doo discloses the memory device further comprising one or more counting pads configured to output the counting signal (page 8, [0101]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 10-14 are objected as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art of record does not show the limitation of wherein each of the carry input pad and the carry output pad is a single pad (claim 10), The prior art of record does not show the limitation of wherein the counting control circuit is further configured to activate, according to a refresh management command, a row reset signal corresponding to the row address, and wherein the partial counting circuit is further configured to initialize the counting signal according to the row reset signal (claim 11). The prior art of record does not show the limitation of wherein the partial counting circuit includes: a plurality of partial row counters respectively corresponding to the plurality of rows and coupled in common to the carry input pad, wherein each partial row counter is configured to: generate the counting signal by counting the carry input signal according to the row selection signal, and output an overflow signal when the counting signal is fully counted; and an output selection circuit configured to output the carry output signal by selecting, according to the row selection signal, one of the overflow signals from the plurality of partial row counters (claims 12-14). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicants’ disclosure. Kim et al (2023/0185460) disclose a includes a memory cell array, a row hammer management circuit and a control logic circuit. The memory cell array includes a plurality of memory cell rows. The row hammer management circuit counts the number of instances of access of each of the memory cell rows, such as in response to the receipt of an active command, to store the counted values in count cells of each of the memory cell rows as count data and, in response to a first command, initiates an internal read-update-write operation to read the count data, to update the read count data, and to write the updated count data in the count cells. The control logic circuit may performs an internal write operation to write the updated count data in the count cells during a second write time interval that is smaller than a first write time interval associated with a normal write operation. When responding to the office action, Applicants’ are advised to provide the examiner with the line numbers and page numbers in the application and/or references cited to assist the examiner to locate the appropriate paragraphs. A shortened statutory period for response to this action is set to expire 3 (three) months and 0 (zero) day from the date of this letter. Failure to respond within the period for response will cause the application to become abandoned (see MPEP 710.02 (b)). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Connie Yoha whose telephone number is (571)272-1799. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8:00AM - 5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander Sofocleous can be reached on 571-272-0635. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CONNIE C YOHA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2825
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 17, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603129
RAMP-BASED BIASING IN A MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603120
SWITCH AND HOLD BIASING FOR MEMORY CELL IMPRINT RECOVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592275
MEMORY STRUCTURE AND CONTROL METHOD FOR MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580007
MEMORY CARD INCLUDING INTERCONNECTION TERMINALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572311
MANAGING WRITE DISTURB BASED ON IDENTIFICATION OF FREQUENTLY-WRITTEN MEMORY UNITS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+0.2%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 726 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month