Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/451,356

INTEGRATED EXPANSION STRUCTURE WITH PNEUMATIC WALL

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Aug 17, 2023
Examiner
CONDO, VERONICA MARIE
Art Unit
3612
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
A&C Future Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
156 granted / 190 resolved
+30.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
222
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
37.6%
-2.4% vs TC avg
§102
35.6%
-4.4% vs TC avg
§112
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 190 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims objected to because of the following informalities: In line 12 of claim 1, it is believed “extends” should be changed to --extend--. In line 2 of claim 6, it is believed “withing” should be changed to --within--. In line 3 of claim 7, it is believed “is” should be removed. In line 3 of claim 9, it is believed the word --is-- is missing after “wall”. In line 8 of claim 12, it is believed “withing” should be changed to --within--. In line 6 of claim 13, it is believed “extends” should be changed to --extend--. In line 3 of claim 15, it is believed “is” should be removed. In line 3 of claim 17, it is believed the word --is-- is missing after “wall”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 12-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 12 recites the limitation "the scissor structure" in line 11. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hanser et al. (US Pat 5,983,576). Regarding claim 1, Hanser et al. disclose an expandable structure 10 comprising: a main structure 12 having a front wall and a rear wall; an outer side wall 14, extending between the front wall and the rear wall (see annotated Figure 2 below), the outer side wall 14 movable between a retracted position, adjacent the main structure 12, and an expanded position, away from the main structure 12 (see Figures 1-2); front and rear expansion walls 16, 18 interconnecting, respectively, the front wall and the rear wall of the main structure 12 with the outer side wall 14; and first and second scissor structures 44 positioned within the front wall and the rear wall, respectively, when the expandable structure 10 is in the stowed position (see Figure 11; Col. 4, lines 29-43), wherein the first and second scissor structures 44 are driven to move the outer side wall 14 between the expanded and retracted positions, in the expanded position, the first and second scissor structures 44 extend between the outer side wall 14 and the front and rear walls, respectively of the main structure 12 (see Figure 11; Col. 4, lines 29-43). The scissor structures 44 are connected to the primary support frame 30, which is a rectangular frame disposed within the front wall and rear wall of the vehicle (see annotated Figure 2 below and Figures 3-4; Col. 2, lines 44-49). PNG media_image1.png 394 594 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 6, Hanser et al. disclose the expandable structure of claim 1, wherein the front and rear expansion walls 16, 18 are stored withing a storage area 16-6, 16-8 formed within respective ones of the front and rear walls (see annotated Figure 2 above, Figures 3-4 and 8; Col. 2, lines 54-57). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 2-3, 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hanser et al. in view of Durand (FR 2554062). Regarding claim 2, Hanser et al. disclose the expandable structure of claim 1, wherein the front and rear expansion walls 16, 18 each include the scissor structure 44 (see Figure 11; Col. 4, lines 29-43). Hanser et al. fail to disclose a bellow structure and a pneumatic structure located within the bellow structure, the pneumatic structure operable to fill with air to provide structural support for the expansion walls; and a wall skin providing an outer finish to the expansion walls. Durand discloses an expandable structure 10 having an outer side wall 24 that moves between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Page 1, lines 31-36). A front and rear expansion wall connects the outer side wall 24 to the main structure 10 and includes a bellow structure 18 having a pneumatic structure 20 within the bellow structure 18 to fill with air to provide structural support for the expansion wall (see Figures 1-2; Page 1, line 31-Page 2, line 12). A wall skin 28 is provided for thermal insulation of the wall (see Figures 1-2; Page 2, lines 8-12). The bellow structure 18 also provides excellent thermal insulation (see Page 2, lines 15-16). The expansion walls also include a structural support 30 encased by the bellow structure 18 to provide stability to the outer side wall 24 (see Figures 1-3; Page 2, lines 17-21). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to encase the first and second scissor structures of Hanser et al. with a bellow structure and provide a pneumatic structure within the bellow structure to fill with air and provide structural support for the expansion walls, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide additional structural support to the expansion walls while also providing thermal insulation, as taught by Durand. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the expansion walls of Hanser et al., as modified by Durand, with a wall skin that provides an outer finish to the expansion walls, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide additional thermal insulation to the expanded structure, as taught by Durand. Regarding claim 3, Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, disclose the expandable structure of claim 2. Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, fail to disclose an air pump provided within the expandable structure to provide air into the pneumatic structure. Durand discloses an expandable structure 10 having an outer side wall 24 that moves between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Page 1, lines 31-36). A front and rear expansion wall connects the outer side wall 24 to the main structure 10 and includes a bellow structure 18 having a pneumatic structure 20 within the bellow structure 18 to fill with air to provide structural support for the expansion wall (see Figures 1-2; Page 1, line 31-Page 2, line 12). A wall skin 28 is provided for thermal insulation of the wall (see Figures 1-2; Page 2, lines 8-12). The bellow structure 18 also provides excellent thermal insulation (see Page 2, lines 15-16). The expansion walls also include a structural support 30 encased by the bellow structure 18 to provide stability to the outer side wall 24 (see Figures 1-3; Page 2, lines 17-21). An air pump (not shown) is positioned in the expandable structure to provide compressed air to the pneumatic structure 20 (see Page 2, lines 21-31). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to include an air pump in the expandable structure of Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide compressed air to the pneumatic structure, as taught by Durand. Regarding claim 5, Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, disclose the expandable structure of claim 2, having an expansion floor member 22 (see Figure 5; Col. 2, lines 62-66). Hanser et al, as modified by Durand twice, fail to disclose the pneumatic structure provides a seal between the expansion floor member and the front and rear expansion walls with the expandable structure is in the expanded position and the pneumatic structure is filled with air. Durand discloses an expandable structure 10 having an outer side wall 24 that moves between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Page 1, lines 31-36). A front and rear expansion wall connects the outer side wall 24 to the main structure 10 and includes a bellow structure 18 having a pneumatic structure 20 within the bellow structure 18 to fill with air to provide structural support for the expansion wall (see Figures 1-2; Page 1, line 31-Page 2, line 12). A wall skin 28 is provided for thermal insulation of the wall (see Figures 1-2; Page 2, lines 8-12). The bellow structure 18 also provides excellent thermal insulation (see Page 2, lines 15-16). The expansion walls also include a structural support 30 encased by the bellow structure 18 to provide stability to the outer side wall 24 (see Figures 1-3; Page 2, lines 17-21). The bellow structure 18 and pneumatic structure 20 extend in a rectangular profile 16 to provide a seal between the outer side wall 24 and the main structure 10 (see Figure 1; Page 1, lines 31-35; Page 2, lines 3-5). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the pneumatic structure of Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, in a rectangular profile to surround the expansion floor member and expansion walls and form a seal when the pneumatic structure is filled with air, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide effective thermal insulation to the expandable structure, as taught by Durand. Regarding claim 12, Hanser et al. disclose an expandable structure 10 comprising: a main structure 12 having a front wall and a rear wall; an outer side wall 14, extending between the front wall and the rear wall (see annotated Figure 2 below), the outer side wall 14 movable between a retracted position, adjacent the main structure 12, and an expanded position, away from the main structure 12 (see Figures 1-2); front and rear expansion walls 16, 18 interconnecting, respectively, the front wall and the rear wall of the main structure 12 with the outer side wall 14, wherein the front and rear expansion walls 16, 18 are stored within a storage area 16-6, 16-8 formed within respective ones of the front and rear walls (see Figures 3-4 and 8; Col. 2, lines 54-57). A scissor structure 44 is positioned on the front and rear walls, respectively (see Figure 11; Col. 4, lines 29-43). PNG media_image1.png 394 594 media_image1.png Greyscale Hanser et al. fail to disclose a bellow structure and a pneumatic structure located within the bellow structure, the pneumatic structure operable to fill with air to provide structural support for the expansion walls; and a wall skin providing an outer finish to the expansion walls. Durand discloses an expandable structure 10 having an outer side wall 24 that moves between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Page 1, lines 31-36). A front and rear expansion wall connects the outer side wall 24 to the main structure 10 and includes a bellow structure 18 having a pneumatic structure 20 within the bellow structure 18 to fill with air to provide structural support for the expansion wall (see Figures 1-2; Page 1, line 31-Page 2, line 12). A wall skin 28 is provided for thermal insulation of the wall (see Figures 1-2; Page 2, lines 8-12). The bellow structure 18 also provides excellent thermal insulation (see Page 2, lines 15-16). The expansion walls also include a structural support 30 encased by the bellow structure 18 to provide stability to the outer side wall 24 (see Figures 1-3; Page 2, lines 17-21). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to encase the first and second scissor structures of Hanser et al. with a bellow structure and provide a pneumatic structure within the bellow structure to fill with air and provide structural support for the expansion walls, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide additional structural support to the expansion walls while also providing thermal insulation, as taught by Durand. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the expansion walls of Hanser et al., as modified by Durand, with a wall skin that provides an outer finish to the expansion walls, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide additional thermal insulation to the expanded structure, as taught by Durand. Regarding claim 13, Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, disclose the expandable structure of claim 12, further comprising: first and second scissor structures 44 positioned within the front wall and the rear wall, respectively, when the expandable structure 10 is in the stowed position (see Figure 11; Col. 4, lines 29-43), wherein the first and second scissor structures 44 are driven to move the outer side wall 14 between the expanded and retracted positions, in the expanded position, the first and second scissor structures 44 extend between the outer side wall 14 and the front and rear walls, respectively of the main structure 12 (see Figure 11; Col. 4, lines 29-43). The scissor structures 44 are connected to the primary support frame 30, which is a rectangular frame disposed within the front wall and rear wall of the vehicle (see annotated Figure 2 above and Figures 3-4; Col. 2, lines 44-49). Regarding claim 14, Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, disclose the expandable structure of claim 12, having an expansion floor member 22 (see Figure 5; Col. 2, lines 62-66). Hanser et al, as modified by Durand twice, fail to disclose the pneumatic structure provides a seal between the expansion floor member and the front and rear expansion walls with the expandable structure is in the expanded position and the pneumatic structure is filled with air. Durand discloses an expandable structure 10 having an outer side wall 24 that moves between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Page 1, lines 31-36). A front and rear expansion wall connects the outer side wall 24 to the main structure 10 and includes a bellow structure 18 having a pneumatic structure 20 within the bellow structure 18 to fill with air to provide structural support for the expansion wall (see Figures 1-2; Page 1, line 31-Page 2, line 12). A wall skin 28 is provided for thermal insulation of the wall (see Figures 1-2; Page 2, lines 8-12). The bellow structure 18 also provides excellent thermal insulation (see Page 2, lines 15-16). The expansion walls also include a structural support 30 encased by the bellow structure 18 to provide stability to the outer side wall 24 (see Figures 1-3; Page 2, lines 17-21). The bellow structure 18 and pneumatic structure 20 extend in a rectangular profile 16 to provide a seal between the outer side wall 24 and the main structure 10 (see Figure 1; Page 1, lines 31-35; Page 2, lines 3-5). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the pneumatic structure of Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, in a rectangular profile to surround the expansion floor member and expansion walls and form a seal when the pneumatic structure is filled with air, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide effective thermal insulation to the expandable structure, as taught by Durand. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, in view of Okamoto (US Pat 6,565,143). Regarding claim 4, Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, disclose the expandable structure of claim 2, wherein the bellows, pneumatic structure and wall skin are latched to the outer side wall 14 to deploy the front and rear expansion walls during expansion of the outer side wall 14. Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, fail to disclose that the bellows, pneumatic structure and wall skin automatically deploy the front and rear expansion walls. Okamoto discloses an expandable structure having a main structure 7 with an outer side wall 5 movable between a retracted position (see Figure 3a) and an expanded position (see Figure 3b; Col. 4, lines 11-20). The outer side wall 5 automatically deploys bellows 2 and a pneumatic structure 3 when the outer side wall 5 is moved between the retracted position and the expanded position (see Figures 4a-4c; Col. 4, lines 28-32). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the bellows, pneumatic structure and wall skin of Hanser et al, as modified by Durand twice, to automatically deploy the front and rear expansion walls during expansion of the outer side wall, with a reasonable expectation of success, as taught by Okamoto, to eliminate additional steps and simplify the process of expanding and retracting the expandable structure. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hanser et al. in view of Cantin et al. (US PG Pub 2014/0001786). Regarding claim 7, Hanser et al. disclose the expandable structure of claim 1, further comprising an expansion floor section 22 movable to provide a floor surface for the expandable structure in the expanded position (see Figures 5-6; Col. 2, lines 64-67). Hanser et al. fail to disclose the expansion floor section is disposed substantially vertically in the retracted position. Cantin et al. disclose an expandable structure having a main structure 110’ and an outer side wall 234 having a floor assembly 232, or “expansion floor member”. In the retracted position, the floor assembly 232 is disposed substantially vertically (see Figures 2A-2E; Paragraph 39). The floor assembly 232 is stored substantially vertically in order to provide space for other features of the expandable structure (see Paragraph 39). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the expansion floor member of Hanser et al. in a manner to dispose the expansion floor section substantially vertically in the retracted position, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide space for other features of the expandable structure in the main structure, as taught by Cantin et al.. Claims 8-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al., in view of Garceau et al. (US Pat 9,050,923). Regarding claim 8, Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al., disclose the expandable structure of claim 7. Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al., fail to disclose a hidden floor support structure disposed within a floor of the main structure when the expandable structure is in the retracted position, the hidden floor support providing support for the expansion floor section when the expandable structure is in the expanded position. Garceau et al. disclose an expandable structure 20 having a main structure 22 and an outer side wall 24 movable between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Col. 5, lines 1-18). The outer side wall 24 includes an expansion floor section 40 having a plurality of slats 100 attached to the expansion floor section 40 and disposed within a floor of the main structure 22 when the outer side wall 24 is in the retracted position, providing support for the expansion floor section 40 when the outer side wall 24 is in the expanded position (see Figures 4-7; Col. 7, line 36-Col. 8, line 16). The plurality of slats 100 provide additive structural integrity to the outer side wall 24 (see Col. 7, lines 57-60). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the expansion floor section of Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al., having a hidden floor support structure disposed within a floor of the main structure when the expandable structure is in the retracted position and providing support for the expansion floor section when the expandable structure is in the expanded position, with a reasonable expectation of success, to ensure there is sufficient strength to support the weight of the expansion floor section, as taught by Garceau et al.. Regarding claim 9, Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., disclose the expandable structure of claim 8. Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., fail to disclose the hidden floor support structure is attached to the outer side wall and moves outward from the main structure as the outer side wall is moved into the expanded position. Garceau et al. disclose an expandable structure 20 having a main structure 22 and an outer side wall 24 movable between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Col. 5, lines 1-18). The outer side wall 24 includes an expansion floor section 40 having a plurality of slats 100 attached to the expansion floor section 40 and disposed within a floor of the main structure 22 when the outer side wall 24 is in the retracted position, providing support for the expansion floor section 40 when the outer side wall 24 is in the expanded position (see Figures 4-7; Col. 7, line 36-Col. 8, line 3). The plurality of slats 100 enable the outer side wall 24 to expand and retract smoothly and evenly (see Col. 9, lines 41-44). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to attach the hidden floor support of Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., to the outer side wall such that it moves outward from the main structure as the outer side wall is moved into the expanded position, with a reasonable expectation of success, to allow the outer side wall to expand and retract smoothly and evenly, as taught by Garceau et al.. Regarding claim 10, Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., disclose the expandable structure of claim 8. Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., fail to disclose the hidden floor support includes a plurality of slats fitting into and extendable out of slots formed in the floor of the main structure. Garceau et al. disclose an expandable structure 20 having a main structure 22 and an outer side wall 24 movable between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Col. 5, lines 1-18). The outer side wall 24 includes an expansion floor section 40 having a plurality of slats 100 attached to the expansion floor section 40 and disposed within a floor of the main structure 22 when the outer side wall 24 is in the retracted position, providing support for the expansion floor section 40 when the outer side wall 24 is in the expanded position (see Figures 4-7; Col. 7, line 36-Col. 8, line 3). The plurality of slats 100 enable the outer side wall 24 to expand and retract smoothly and evenly (see Col. 9, lines 41-44). Corner members 62 are positioned on the main structure 22 and have slots 130 in which the plurality of slats 100 are positioned, including in the floor of the main structure 22 (see Figures 5-7, 14-19 and 26; Col. 6, lines 17-23; Col. 8, lines 17-27). The slots 130 act as guides for the plurality of slats 100 (see Col. 8, lines 17-27). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the hidden floor support structure of Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., as a plurality of slats fitting into and extending out of slots formed in the floor of the main structure, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide a means of guiding the expandable structure while also providing additional support, as taught by Garceau et al.. Regarding claim 11, Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., disclose the expandable structure of claim 8. Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., fail to disclose a gear structure interconnecting the expansion floor section with the hidden floor support structure, wherein movement of the hidden floor support structure automatically drives rotation of the expansion floor section to move between the expanded position and the retracted position. Garceau et al. disclose an expandable structure 20 having a main structure 22 and an outer side wall 24 movable between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Col. 5, lines 1-18). The outer side wall 24 includes an expansion floor section 40 having a plurality of slats 100, as a hidden floor support structure, attached to the expansion floor section 40 and disposed within a floor of the main structure 22 when the outer side wall 24 is in the retracted position, providing support for the expansion floor section 40 when the outer side wall 24 is in the expanded position (see Figures 4-7; Col. 7, line 36-Col. 8, line 3). A gear structure 102 interconnects the expansion floor section 40 with the plurality of slats 100, wherein movement of the plurality of slats 100 automatically drives rotation of the expansion floor section 40 to move between the expanded position and the retracted position and limits the amount of travel of the expansion floor structure 40 (see Figures ; Col. 7, lines 36-67). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to interconnect the expansion floor section of Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., to the hidden floor support structure with a gear structure to automatically drive rotation of the expansion floor section between the expanded position and the retracted position, with a reasonable expectation of success, to limit travel of the expansion floor structure and maximize space while also providing support to the expansion floor structure, as taught by Garceau et al.. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, in view of Cantin et al.. Regarding claim 15, Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, disclose the expandable structure of claim 12, further comprising an expansion floor section 22 movable to provide a floor surface for the expandable structure in the expanded position (see Figures 5-6; Col. 2, lines 64-67). Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, fail to disclose the expansion floor section is disposed substantially vertically in the retracted position. Cantin et al. disclose an expandable structure having a main structure 110’ and an outer side wall 234 having a floor assembly 232, or “expansion floor member”. In the retracted position, the floor assembly 232 is disposed substantially vertically (see Figures 2A-2E; Paragraph 39). The floor assembly 232 is stored substantially vertically in order to provide space for other features of the expandable structure (see Paragraph 39). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the expansion floor member of Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, in a manner to dispose the expansion floor section substantially vertically in the retracted position, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide space for other features of the expandable structure in the main structure, as taught by Cantin et al.. Claims 16-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hanser et al, as modified by Durand twice and Cantin et al., in view of Garceau et al.. Regarding claim 16, Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice and Cantin et al., disclose the expandable structure of claim 15. Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice and Cantin et al., fail to disclose a hidden floor support structure disposed within a floor of the main structure when the expandable structure is in the retracted position, the hidden floor support providing support for the expansion floor section when the expandable structure is in the expanded position. Garceau et al. disclose an expandable structure 20 having a main structure 22 and an outer side wall 24 movable between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Col. 5, lines 1-18). The outer side wall 24 includes an expansion floor section 40 having a plurality of slats 100 attached to the expansion floor section 40 and disposed within a floor of the main structure 22 when the outer side wall 24 is in the retracted position, providing support for the expansion floor section 40 when the outer side wall 24 is in the expanded position (see Figures 4-7; Col. 7, line 36-Col. 8, line 16). The plurality of slats 100 provide additive structural integrity to the outer side wall 24 (see Col. 7, lines 57-60). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the expansion floor section of Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice and Cantin et al., having a hidden floor support structure disposed within a floor of the main structure when the expandable structure is in the retracted position and providing support for the expansion floor section when the expandable structure is in the expanded position, with a reasonable expectation of success, to ensure there is sufficient strength to support the weight of the expansion floor section, as taught by Garceau et al.. Regarding claim 17, Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., disclose the expandable structure of claim 16. Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., fail to disclose the hidden floor support structure is attached to the outer side wall and moves outward from the main structure as the outer side wall is moved into the expanded position. Garceau et al. disclose an expandable structure 20 having a main structure 22 and an outer side wall 24 movable between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Col. 5, lines 1-18). The outer side wall 24 includes an expansion floor section 40 having a plurality of slats 100 attached to the expansion floor section 40 and disposed within a floor of the main structure 22 when the outer side wall 24 is in the retracted position, providing support for the expansion floor section 40 when the outer side wall 24 is in the expanded position (see Figures 4-7; Col. 7, line 36-Col. 8, line 3). The plurality of slats 100 enable the outer side wall 24 to expand and retract smoothly and evenly (see Col. 9, lines 41-44). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to attach the hidden floor support of Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., to the outer side wall such that it moves outward from the main structure as the outer side wall is moved into the expanded position, with a reasonable expectation of success, to allow the outer side wall to expand and retract smoothly and evenly, as taught by Garceau et al.. Regarding claim 18, Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., disclose the expandable structure of claim 16. Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., fail to disclose the hidden floor support includes a plurality of slats fitting into and extendable out of slots formed in the floor of the main structure. Garceau et al. disclose an expandable structure 20 having a main structure 22 and an outer side wall 24 movable between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Col. 5, lines 1-18). The outer side wall 24 includes an expansion floor section 40 having a plurality of slats 100 attached to the expansion floor section 40 and disposed within a floor of the main structure 22 when the outer side wall 24 is in the retracted position, providing support for the expansion floor section 40 when the outer side wall 24 is in the expanded position (see Figures 4-7; Col. 7, line 36-Col. 8, line 3). The plurality of slats 100 enable the outer side wall 24 to expand and retract smoothly and evenly (see Col. 9, lines 41-44). Corner members 62 are positioned on the main structure 22 and have slots 130 in which the plurality of slats 100 are positioned, including in the floor of the main structure 22 (see Figures 5-7, 14-19 and 26; Col. 6, lines 17-23; Col. 8, lines 17-27). The slots 130 act as guides for the plurality of slats 100 (see Col. 8, lines 17-27). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the hidden floor support structure of Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., as a plurality of slats fitting into and extending out of slots formed in the floor of the main structure, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide a means of guiding the expandable structure while also providing additional support, as taught by Garceau et al.. Regarding claim 19, Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., disclose the expandable structure of claim 16. Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., fail to disclose a gear structure interconnecting the expansion floor section with the hidden floor support structure, wherein movement of the hidden floor support structure automatically drives rotation of the expansion floor section to move between the expanded position and the retracted position. Garceau et al. disclose an expandable structure 20 having a main structure 22 and an outer side wall 24 movable between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Col. 5, lines 1-18). The outer side wall 24 includes an expansion floor section 40 having a plurality of slats 100, as a hidden floor support structure, attached to the expansion floor section 40 and disposed within a floor of the main structure 22 when the outer side wall 24 is in the retracted position, providing support for the expansion floor section 40 when the outer side wall 24 is in the expanded position (see Figures 4-7; Col. 7, line 36-Col. 8, line 3). A gear structure 102 interconnects the expansion floor section 40 with the plurality of slats 100, wherein movement of the plurality of slats 100 automatically drives rotation of the expansion floor section 40 to move between the expanded position and the retracted position and limits the amount of travel of the expansion floor structure 40 (see Figures ; Col. 7, lines 36-67). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to interconnect the expansion floor section of Hanser et al., as modified by Durand twice, Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., to the hidden floor support structure with a gear structure to automatically drive rotation of the expansion floor section between the expanded position and the retracted position, with a reasonable expectation of success, to limit travel of the expansion floor structure and maximize space while also providing support to the expansion floor structure, as taught by Garceau et al.. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hanser et al. in view of Cantin et al. and Garceau et al.. Regarding claim 20, Hanser et al. disclose an expandable structure 10 comprising: a main structure 12 having a front wall and a rear wall; an outer side wall 14, extending between the front wall and the rear wall (see annotated Figure 2 below), the outer side wall 14 movable between a retracted position, adjacent the main structure 12, and an expanded position, away from the main structure 12 (see Figures 1-2); front and rear expansion walls 16, 18 interconnecting, respectively, the front wall and the rear wall of the main structure 12 with the outer side wall 14; and first and second scissor structures 44 positioned within the front wall and the rear wall, respectively, when the expandable structure 10 is in the stowed position (see Figure 11; Col. 4, lines 29-43), wherein the first and second scissor structures 44 are driven to move the outer side wall 14 between the expanded and retracted positions, in the expanded position, the first and second scissor structures 44 extend between the outer side wall 14 and the front and rear walls, respectively of the main structure 12 (see Figure 11; Col. 4, lines 29-43). The scissor structures 44 are connected to the primary support frame 30, which is a rectangular frame disposed within the front wall and rear wall of the vehicle (see annotated Figure 2 below and Figures 3-4; Col. 2, lines 44-49). An expansion floor section 22 is movable to provide a floor surface for the expandable structure in the expanded position (see Figures 5-6; Col. 2, lines 64-67). PNG media_image1.png 394 594 media_image1.png Greyscale Hanser et al. fail to disclose the expansion floor section is disposed substantially vertically in the retracted position; a hidden floor support structure disposed within a floor of the main structure when the expandable structure is in the retracted position, the hidden floor support providing support for the expansion floor section when the expandable structure is in the expanded position; and the hidden floor support structure is attached to the outer side wall and moves outward from the main structure as the outer side wall is moved into the expanded position. Cantin et al. disclose an expandable structure having a main structure 110’ and an outer side wall 234 having a floor assembly 232, or “expansion floor member”. In the retracted position, the floor assembly 232 is disposed substantially vertically (see Figures 2A-2E; Paragraph 39). The floor assembly 232 is stored substantially vertically in order to provide space for other features of the expandable structure (see Paragraph 39). Garceau et al. disclose an expandable structure 20 having a main structure 22 and an outer side wall 24 movable between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Col. 5, lines 1-18). The outer side wall 24 includes an expansion floor section 40 having a plurality of slats 100 attached to the expansion floor section 40 and disposed within a floor of the main structure 22 when the outer side wall 24 is in the retracted position, providing support for the expansion floor section 40 when the outer side wall 24 is in the expanded position (see Figures 4-7; Col. 7, line 36-Col. 8, line 16). The plurality of slats 100 provide additive structural integrity to the outer side wall 24 (see Col. 7, lines 57-60) and enable the outer side wall 24 to expand and retract smoothly and evenly (see Col. 9, lines 41-44). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the expansion floor member of Hanser et al. in a manner to dispose the expansion floor section substantially vertically in the retracted position, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide space for other features of the expandable structure in the main structure, as taught by Cantin et al.. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the expansion floor section of Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al., having a hidden floor support structure disposed within a floor of the main structure when the expandable structure is in the retracted position and providing support for the expansion floor section when the expandable structure is in the expanded position, with a reasonable expectation of success, to ensure there is sufficient strength to support the weight of the expansion floor section, as taught by Garceau et al.. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to attach the hidden floor support of Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al., to the outer side wall such that it moves outward from the main structure as the outer side wall is moved into the expanded position, with a reasonable expectation of success, to allow the outer side wall to expand and retract smoothly and evenly, as taught by Garceau et al.. Claim 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al. twice, in view of Durand. Regarding claim 21, Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al. twice, disclose the expandable structure of claim 20, wherein the front and rear expansion walls 16, 18 each include the scissor structure 44 (see Figure 11; Col. 4, lines 29-43). Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al. twice, fail to disclose a bellow structure and a pneumatic structure located within the bellow structure, the pneumatic structure operable to fill with air to provide structural support for the expansion walls; and a wall skin providing an outer finish to the expansion walls. Durand discloses an expandable structure 10 having an outer side wall 24 that moves between a retracted position and an expanded position (see Figures 1-2; Page 1, lines 31-36). A front and rear expansion wall connects the outer side wall 24 to the main structure 10 and includes a bellow structure 18 having a pneumatic structure 20 within the bellow structure 18 to fill with air to provide structural support for the expansion wall (see Figures 1-2; Page 1, line 31-Page 2, line 12). A wall skin 28 is provided for thermal insulation of the wall (see Figures 1-2; Page 2, lines 8-12). The bellow structure 18 also provides excellent thermal insulation (see Page 2, lines 15-16). The expansion walls also include a structural support 30 encased by the bellow structure 18 to provide stability to the outer side wall 24 (see Figures 1-3; Page 2, lines 17-21). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to encase the first and second scissor structures of Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al. and Garceau et al. twice, with a bellow structure and provide a pneumatic structure within the bellow structure to fill with air and provide structural support for the expansion walls, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide additional structural support to the expansion walls while also providing thermal insulation, as taught by Durand. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date of the claimed invention to construct the expansion walls of Hanser et al., as modified by Cantin et al., Garceau et al. twice, and Durand, with a wall skin that provides an outer finish to the expansion walls, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide additional thermal insulation to the expanded structure, as taught by Durand. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Jones (US Pat 6,212,710) discloses an expandable structure having and outer side wall, expansion side walls, and a bellows structure. Hussaini (US Pat 5,248,180) discloses an expandable structure having an outer side wall, front and rear expansion walls, a hidden floor support, a scissor structure, a gear structure, and an expansion floor section. Blodgett, Jr. (US Pat 7,175,219) discloses an expandable structure having an outer side wall, front and rear expansion walls, first and second scissor structures, and a floor. Cornelius et al. (US Pat 1,513,227) disclose an expandable structure having an outer side wall, front and rear expansion walls, first and second scissor structures, and a bellow structure. Few et al. (US Pat 5,570,924) disclose an expandable structure having a main structure, an outer side wall, front and rear expansion walls, a scissor structure, a hidden floor support, and slots in a floor of the main structure. Gerenzy et al. (US Pat 4,981,319) disclose an expandable structure having a main structure, an outer side wall, front and rear expansion walls, first and second scissor structures, and a bellow structure. Ballas (US Pat 3,534,512) discloses an expandable structure having a main structure, front and rear expansion walls, and a bellows structure. Ballay et al. (US Pat 3,629,982) disclose an expandable structure having a main structure, an outer side wall, front and rear expansion walls, a bellow structure, and a pneumatic structure. Gamble et al. (US Pat 3,526,066) disclose an expandable structure having a main structure, an outer side wall, front and rear expansion walls, first and second scissor structure, and an expansion floor section positioned substantially vertical in a retracted position. Pillet (FR 2617449) discloses an expandable structure having a main structure, an outer side wall, front and rear expansion walls, a bellows structure, an expansion floor section, and a hidden floor support. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VERONICA M CONDO whose telephone number is (571)272-9415. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8am-3pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Weisberg can be reached at (571) 270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VERONICA M CONDO/Examiner, Art Unit 3612 /AMY R WEISBERG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594998
STIFFENED PANEL STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12565167
SYSTEMS FOR INCREASING AIRFLOW PAST A VEHICLE ENERGY ABSORBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12552463
VEHICLE HAVING A BULKHEAD FOR A GAS CHANNEL BETWEEN A BATTERY SYSTEM AND AN UNDERRIDE PROTECTION PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12545086
TARGA AND RETRACTABLE VEHICLE TOPS AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12539802
EMBEDDED MOUNTING INSERTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+4.7%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 190 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month