Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/451,659

CONTACTOR AND BATTERY PACK INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 17, 2023
Priority
Apr 25, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0054246
Examiner
TALBOT, BRIAN K
Art Unit
1712
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
690 granted / 1167 resolved
-5.9% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
1227
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
90.0%
+50.0% vs TC avg
§102
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1167 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-8, in the reply filed on 4/24/26 is acknowledged. Claim 9 has been withdrawn from consideration as being directed toward a non-elected invention. Claims 1-8 remain in the application for prosecution thereof. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 and 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by WO 2019/149125. WO 2019/149125 discloses in Fig. 1, 5-16 a contactor comprising: a first fixing contact terminal 204 electrically connected to an energy storage device 101; a second fixing contact terminal 208 electrically connected to a load 104; and a moving contact terminal 205 coupled to or separated from the first fixed contact terminal and the second fixed contact terminal according to a control signal, wherein the first fixed contact terminal and the second fixed contact terminal are coupled to the moving contact terminal by a male-female coupling structure Regarding claims 2 and 3, WO 2019/149125 teaches the first and second contact terminals to have fitting grooves while the moving contact terminal to have first and second protrusions which accommodate the grooves (Fig. 1, 5-16). Regarding claims 6-8, WO 2019/149125 teaches first and second contact coils configured to be coupled to the first and second contact terminals using a control signal. The moving contact terminal can be moved vertically or horizontally (Figs. 1 and 5-16). Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by CN 113675042. CN 113675042 teaches a contactor comprising: a first fixing contact terminal 101 electrically connectable to an energy storage device; a second fixing contact terminal 102 electrically connectable to a load; and a moving contact terminal 3 coupled to or separated from the first fixed contact terminal and the second fixed contact terminal according to a control signal, wherein the first fixed contact terminal and the second fixed contact terminal are couplable to the moving contact terminal by a male-female coupling structure (see fig. 21 & 22), Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2019/149125 in combination with CN 113675043. Features detailed above concerning the teachings of WO 2019/149125 are incorporated here. WO 2019/149125 fails to teach the first and second fixing contact terminal comprises first and second protrusions and the moving contact terminal has first and second grooves or a single groove accommodating the first and second protrusions CN 113675043 teaches these limitation as detailed in Fig. 5, 6, 9-11,14. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified WO 2019/149125 to have protrusions and fitted grooves respectively as evidenced by CN 113675043 with the expectation of similar success. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 113675042 in combination with CN 109192617. Features detailed above concerning the teachings of CN 113675042. CN 113675042 fails to teach a second contactor coil configured to move the moving contact terminal to be separated from the first fixing contact terminal and the second fixing contact terminal according to the contactor open signal. CN 109192617 teaches similar contact coils 5 and 6. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified CN 113675042 to include a second contactor coil configured to move the moving contact terminal as evidenced by CN 109192617. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN K TALBOT whose telephone number is (571)272-1428. The examiner can normally be reached Monday -Friday 7-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MICHAEL CLEVELAND can be reached at 571-272-1418. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN K TALBOT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1712
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681353
OPTICAL DEVICE FABRICATION
4y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678822
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SUBSTRATE FUNCTIONALIZATION
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676302
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, METHOD FOR PREPARING NEGATIVE ELECTRODE FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING NEGATIVE ELECTRODE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673365
Method for preparing sintered anode aluminum foil and sintered anode aluminum foil
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671062
VIRTUAL SHUTTER IN ION BEAM SYSTEM
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+30.7%)
3y 3m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1167 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month