Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/451,732

TEMPORARY PERIMETER CONTAINMENT ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 17, 2023
Priority
Aug 17, 2022 — AU 2022902349 +1 more
Examiner
MCFARLAND, KATHLEEN MAVOURNEEN
Art Unit
3635
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Worthdown Pty Ltd. Atf Ausrica C Trust
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
86 granted / 145 resolved
+7.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
183
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
90.7%
+50.7% vs TC avg
§102
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§112
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 145 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 4-14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on April 7, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 15, 17 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jones (3,513,606). Jones discloses: Claim 1: A temporary perimeter containment assembly comprising: a main frame having a central section (Fig. 21; 42 center), the central section comprising central posts (Fig. 21; 2 left and right) which are generally parallel and spaced apart from each other (Fig. 21; 2 left and right are depicted as spaced apart), each post being adjustable in height (Fig. 21; via 21) to allow the post to extend fully between a floor surface and a ceiling of a building floor (Fig. 21; Col. 4, Lines 35-41), bars or gates (Fig. 21; 36 upper and lower) extending between the central posts, wherein each central post in cross-section is generally rectangular (Fig. 1; 2, Col. 3, Lines 37-40), including opposing first side faces and opposing second side faces (Fig. 1; see detail), wherein each of the first and second faces comprises a continuous channel (Fig. 1; 3) extending the length of the post between lower and upper ends thereof (Fig. 1; 3, Col. 3, Lines 37-40). PNG media_image1.png 635 531 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 2: The assembly of claim 1 wherein the central posts each comprises a support screw jack (Fig. 1; 17) at a lower end thereof, and a spring-loaded header plate (Fig. 1; 21) at an upper end thereof for engaging the ceiling (Fig. 21; Col. 4, Lines 35-41). Claim 15: The assembly of claim 1 further comprising a support section (Fig. 21; 42 right) to extend to a live side edge from the central section, the support section comprising vertical end posts (Fig. 21; 2 positioned on the outer edge of 42 right, Col. 5, Lines 13-20) and horizontal support beams (Fig. 21; 36 upper, positioned on the outer edge of 42 right, Col. 5, Lines 13-20) extending between the end posts and the central posts (Col. 5, Lines 13-20), and gates or bars extending between the end posts (Fig. 21; 36 lower, positioned on the outer edge of 42 right, Col. 5, Lines 13-20), wherein the horizontal support beams are connected to a channel of the second side face (Col. 5, Lines 13-20). Claim 17: The assembly of claim 1 further comprising an extension section (Fig. 21; 42 right) to extend to a work side from the central section (Fig. 21; 42 center), the extension section comprising proximal posts (Fig. 21; 2 positioned on the outer edge of 42 right, Col. 5, Lines 13-20) and horizontal support beams (Fig. 21; 36 upper, positioned on the outer edge of 42 right, Col. 5, Lines 13-20) extending between the proximal posts and the central posts, and gates or bars extending between the proximal posts (Fig. 21; 36 lower, positioned on the outer edge of 42 right, Col. 5, Lines 13-20). Claim 20: The assembly of claim 17 further comprising a plant stopper bunt (Fig. 21; 18) extending between the proximal posts at the floor surface (Fig. 21; 18 are shown extending between 2 at the floor surface). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jones (3,513,606) in view of Hohmann et al. (2019/0226220) hereinafter Hohmann. Claim 3: Jones discloses the assembly of claim 2 wherein the header plate is mounted via a spring (Fig. 1; 27) located internally within the post but fails to disclose a pivoting tab indicator to show when the plate has sufficiently engaged the ceiling. However, Hohmann discloses a pivoting tab (Fig. 15; 52, Para. [0171]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the assembly of Jones to include the pivoting tab, as taught by Hohmann, with a reasonable expectation of success because it would provide a visual signal to a user that the assembly is in the fully extended position (Para. [0171]). Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jones (3,513,606) in view of D’Alessio et al. (4,481,748) hereinafter D’Alessio. Claim 16: Jones discloses the assembly of claim 15 but fails to disclose further comprising half-ring brackets mounted to a channel of the second side face, the half-ring brackets having angularly spaced apertures for selectable angular attachment of the horizontal support beam thereto. However, D’Alessio discloses half-ring brackets (Fig. 11; 21) having angularly spaced apertures (Fig. 11; 25-27) for selectable angular attachment. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the assembly of Jones to include the brackets, as taught by D’Alessio, with a reasonable expectation of success because it would allow a variety of assembly configurations to be achieved. Claims 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jones (3,513,606) in view of Melic (2017/0096824). Claim 18: Jones discloses the assembly of claim 15 but fails to disclose further including a hinged pivotable kickplate to extend between the lower portions of the end posts. However, Melic discloses a hinged pivotable kickplate (Fig. 2b; 12, Para. [0080 & 0082]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the assembly of Jones to include the kickplate, as taught by Melic, with a reasonable expectation of success because it would prevent items from rolling under the panels. Claim 19: Melic discloses the assembly of claim 18 wherein the kickplate is pivotable downwardly to allow the kickplate to lay flat on the floor surface (Fig. 2b; 12, Para. [0080 & 0082]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kathleen M. McFarland whose telephone number is (571)272-9139. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Mattei can be reached at (571) 270-3238. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kathleen M. McFarland/Examiner, Art Unit 3635 Kathleen M. McFarland Examiner Art Unit 3635 /BRIAN D MATTEI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 17, 2023
Application Filed
May 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12624558
MODULAR DOZER PLATFORM
4y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624591
BOX STRUCTURE BUILDING PARTITION
2y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12600584
MOBILE ACCESS UNIT AND CAGE
6y 7m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599791
SELF-RETRACTING LIFELINE HOUSING
5y 4m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12565908
Carabiner Divider and Fall Arrest System
4y 11m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+13.6%)
3y 6m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 145 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month