Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/452,640

METHOD FOR ADAPTING A THRESHOLD FOR A NEAR FIELD COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND NEAR FIELD COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 21, 2023
Examiner
TALUKDER, MD K
Art Unit
2648
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
BCS Access Systems US, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
645 granted / 808 resolved
+17.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
841
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
63.7%
+23.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 808 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. It would be of great assistance to the office if all incoming papers pertaining to a filed application carried the following items: i. Application number (checked for accuracy, including series code and serial no.). ii. Group art unit number (copied from most recent Office communication). iii. Filing date. iv. Name of the examiner who prepared the most recent Office action. v. Title of invention. vi. Confirmation number (See MPEP § 503). 3. The Examiner has pointed out particular references contained in the prior art of record within the body of this action for the convenience of the Applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages, paragraph and figures may apply. Applicant, in preparing the response, should consider fully the entire reference as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. 4. Claim interpretation: When multiple limitations are connected with “OR”, one of the limitations doesn’t have any patentable weight since both of the limitations are optional. Claim Rejection- 35 USC § 103 5. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tramoni et al (Pub No. 2021/0328625) and further in view of Gu et al (Pub No. 9544853). Regarding claim 1, Tramoni et al discloses a method for adapting a threshold for a near field communication (NFC) system (Abstract: NFC device threshold adjustment based on other device detection), the NFC system comprising a NFC device transmitting a signal via an antenna and receiving a signal via the antenna (Para. 41 & 44: Multiple NFC devices transmit and receive signals by NFC antenna), wherein the NFC device is kept in a detection mode and checks for a signal to be received (Para. 42-43 & 145: NFC device in active mode. NFC device detect any NFC signals in the range), wherein the NFC device is transferred into an active read mode when the signal received exceeds a predefined threshold value (Para. 53-55: High signal threshold[Wingdings font/0xE0] device 100A switches to active mode. Fig. 2: polling frames 202 is above threshold, device 100A is activated to nearby NFC card detected) & (Para. 76 & 80: high state device 100A detects another NFC device), the method comprising: a) performing an identification procedure to determine the cause for the change from the detection mode to the active read mode (Para. 52-55: amplitude change[Wingdings font/0xE0] device 100A switches to active mode & Para. 144-146: determine change-determine amplitude burst/ change. Amplitude of the bursts 252 of the confirmation mode 250, the emitting device 100A switches to the active mode from standby mode. Standby mode-Emit bursts to active mode); and b) increasing the threshold value and returning to the detection mode if the change to the active read mode was unintended (Fig. 8 & 10: read mode was unintended[Wingdings font/0xE0] false detection. System determine S704- false detection, S706- WKUP mode/ active & S708-NFC to increase MW/ PW threshold) & (Para. 133 & 136 & 120-122). Tramoni et al is silent regarding the NFC system being implement in an application in a vehicle. In a similar field of endeavor, Gu et al discloses the NFC system being implement in an application in a vehicle (Abstract & Col. 3 Line 20-30: Vehicle NFC module operable in active mode or sleep mode). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the NFC device power adjusting process of Tramoni’s disclosure with the NFC device in a vehicle controller, as taught by Gu. Doing so would have resulted in efficiently and dynamically powering the NFC device in a vehicle system to conserve overall power in the system. Regarding claim 19, Claim 19 corresponds to claim 1 and is analyzed accordingly. Regarding claim 2, Tramoni et al discloses the unintended change to the active read mode is caused by an interference and/or an environmental change (Fig. 8: False detection based on the environmental factor-) (Para. 120-122: signal increase-interference/ environment) & (Para. 126 & 158). Regarding claim 3, Tramoni et al discloses the unintended change to the active read mode is determined based on a duration of an environmental change (Para. 47 & 49: Duration changed based on NFC environment) & (Para. 126 & 158). ` Regarding claim 4, Tramoni et al discloses the NFC device periodically checks for a signal to be received (Fig. 8 & Para. 49 & 56: emit periodic detection bursts 200). Regarding claim 5, Tramoni et al discloses the detection mode of the NFC device is a low power polling detection mode with a low power consumption (Fig. 8: LPCD- low power card detection & Para. 46-47) and/or wherein the active read mode is a high power read mode with a high-power consumption (Fig. 7: Wake up-full power). Regarding claim 6, Tramoni et al discloses the NFC device is a transceiver operating in a MHz-range (Para. 73: NFC 13.56 MHz). Regarding claim 7, Tramoni et al discloses the transceiver operates in a range of 13 MHz to 14 MHz (Para. 73: NFC 13.56 MHz). Regarding claim 8, Tramoni et al discloses steps a) and b) are repeated multiple times (Fig. 8 & 10). Regarding claim 9, Tramoni et al discloses steps a) and b) are repeated in a cyclic manner (Fig. 8 & 10). Regarding claim 10, Tramoni et al discloses steps a) and b) are repeated more than a predefined number of times, a standby phase of the detection mode is extended (Fig. 8 & 10: Flowchart step goes number of times) & (Para. 126). Regarding claim 11, Tramoni et al discloses a further change into the active read mode due to the unintended change is detected, the threshold value is set to a maximum value and the active period is extended (Fig. 8 & 10: Threshold value maximum value and the active period is extended) & (Para. 126-137). Regarding claim 12, Tramoni et al discloses at a maximum threshold value an intended NFC tag modifying the signal transmitted by the NFC device has to be within a predefined range of 5mm from the NFC device (Fig. 8 & 10) & (Para. 41 & 45: NFC device works on a short range includes 5mm). Regarding claim 13, Tramoni et al discloses the threshold value is restored to the predefined threshold value when no interference is detected (Fig. 8: No false detection[Wingdings font/0xE0] WKUP[Wingdings font/0xE0] NFC to decrease MW/PW). Regarding claim 14, Tramoni et al discloses the NFC device comprises a processing circuit that characterizes a pattern in the signal received and adjusts the threshold value if the pattern has a defined characteristic (Fig. 8 & 10: Adjust threshold based on NFC pattern). Regarding claim 15, Tramoni et al discloses the NFC device comprises a memory, and wherein the memory stores at least the predefined threshold value of the standard operating mode and the maximum threshold value (Para. 130 & 135: storing unit and threshold value). Regarding claim 16, Tramoni et al discloses the threshold value is adapted based on a change of a level of the signal received and/or the active read mode over time (Fig. 8 & 10: change of a level of the signal received over time). Regarding claim 17, Tramoni et al discloses the threshold value is adapted based on specific signal levels (Fig. 8 & 10: Threshold value is increase/ decreases based on specific signal levels). Regarding claim 18, Tramoni et al is silent regarding the NFC system is implemented in a car access system. Gu et al discloses the NFC system is implemented in a car access system (Abstract & Col. 3 Line 20-30: Vehicle access by NFC key). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the NFC device to control vehicle lock for user convenience. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MD K TALUKDER whose telephone number is (571)270-3222. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thur from 10 am to 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wesley Kim can be reached on 571-272-7867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MD K TALUKDER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604637
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601808
Beam Alignment Method and Related Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602920
IMAGE RECOGNITION METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582302
APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IN VIVO IMAGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575733
STORAGE MEDIUM, IMAGE MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, READING TERMINAL, AND IMAGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+13.8%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 808 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month