Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/452,792

UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE CHARGING METHOD AND SYSTEM AND UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 21, 2023
Priority
Aug 19, 2022 — CN 202210998960.6
Examiner
BERHANU, SAMUEL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Autel Robotics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
776 granted / 1060 resolved
+13.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1084
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
87.3%
+47.3% vs TC avg
§102
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1060 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . -Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “the unmanned aerial vehicle battery is normally powered” . It is unclear how the unmanned vehicle battery is normally powered. The specification does not describe how such normal powering is conveyed. Instead, the battery mounted on the aerial vehicle configured providing to the power supply port. Thus, Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 6-15 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Bradiow et al. (US 2016/0179096) discloses Battery swapping mechanism for Unmanned aerial copter from [see ¶0046]. Wang et al. (US 2016/0144734) discloses battery exchanging/swapping for aerial vehicles [see ¶0038]. Scariatti et al. (US 2014/0129059) discloses battery swapping method for UAC [see ¶0044]. For Claim 6:Primarily, the prior art of record does not disclose or suggest in the claimed combination: a supercapacitor module, a UAV battery module and a power supply port, the unmanned aerial vehicle battery module comprising an unmanned aerial vehicle battery and a second isolation unit, the unmanned aerial vehicle battery being connected to the power supply port through the second isolation unit, an input terminal of the supercapacitor module being connected to an output terminal of the second isolation unit, an output terminal of the supercapacitor module being connected to the power supply port, the unmanned aerial vehicle battery being configured to provide initial electric energy, the second isolation unit being configured to receive and isolate the initial electric energy, and the supercapacitor module being configured to store backup electric energy based on the initial electric energy after isolation and provide the backup electric energy to the power supply port when the unmanned aerial vehicle battery is removed. For Claim 11: primarily, the prior art of record does not disclose or suggest in the claimed combination: the unmanned aerial vehicle charging system being electrically connected to the unmanned aerial vehicle control system and the motor, to power the UAV control system and the motor, wherein the unmanned aerial vehicle charging system comprising: a supercapacitor module, a UAV battery module and a power supply port, the unmanned aerial vehicle battery module comprising an unmanned aerial vehicle battery and a second isolation unit, the unmanned aerial vehicle battery being connected to the power supply port through the second isolation unit, an input terminal of the supercapacitor module being connected to an output terminal of the second isolation unit, an output terminal of the supercapacitor module being connected to the power supply port, the unmanned aerial vehicle battery being configured to provide initial electric energy, the second isolation unit being configured to receive and isolate the initial electric energy, and the supercapacitor module being configured to store backup electric energy based on the initial electric energy after isolation and provide the backup electric energy to the power supply port when the unmanned aerial vehicle battery is removed. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion ` Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMUEL BERHANU whose telephone number is (571)272-8430. The examiner can normally be reached M_F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julian A. Huffman can be reached at Julian.Huffman@uspto.gov. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMUEL BERHANU/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683416
BATTERY PROTECTION CIRCUIT AND PROTECTION METHOD THEREOF
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683413
MULTIPLE PORT POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683422
ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING CHARGING CIRCUIT
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681092
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR STATE OF CHARGE CALIBRATION FOR AN ELECTRICAL ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683421
CHARGING SYSTEM AND EMERGENCY START DEVICE
1y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+14.3%)
3y 0m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1060 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month