Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/454,487

MAGNETIC GROUNDING TECHNIQUES FOR CABLE SHIELDS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 23, 2023
Examiner
LE, THANH TAM T
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1248 granted / 1443 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1476
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§102
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1443 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 7 and 9-10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gao et al. (8,888,500). Regarding claim 1, Gao et al. disclose a magnetic grounding system, comprising: a magnet assembly comprising a permanent magnet (260, Fig. 3), the magnet assembly being galvanically coupled to a ground (a ground of PCB, not labeled, Fig. 2); and a cable assembly (505, Fig. 5) comprising: a metal shield layer (540, Fig. 5) enclosing one or more conductors; and a cable plating (410, Fig. 5) galvanically contacting the metal shield layer, the cable plating comprising an electrically conductive and magnetic material (column 4, lines 40-42), wherein when the cable plating is magnetically fixed to the magnet assembly via magnetic attraction between the cable plating and the permanent magnet, the metal shield layer is galvanically coupled to the ground via electrical contact between the cable plating and the magnet assembly. Regarding claim 7, Gao et al., Fig. 5 shows the cable assembly further comprises an insulation layer (507) surrounding the metal shield layer, a portion of the insulation layer is removed to expose a portion of the metal shield layer, and the cable plating galvanically contacts the exposed portion of the metal shield layer. Regarding claim 9, Fig. 5 shows the metal shield layer completely encloses the one or more conductors of the cable assembly. Regarding claim 10, the one or more conductors of the cable assembly are coupled to a set of respective connection pins (not labeled, Fig. 10), and wherein when the cable plating is magnetically fixed to the magnet assembly, the set of respective connection pins of the cable assembly are aligned with corresponding conductors of a mated connector. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-5 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao et al. in view of Schultz (9,992,869). Regarding claim 2, Gao et al. disclose the claimed invention as described above except for the magnet assembly comprises a magnet plating that is plated onto the permanent magnet, the magnet plating comprising an electrically-conductive material. Schultz, column 13, lines 19-26 state that the magnets may be plated or coated with conductive metals. It would have been obvious to provide Gao et al. to have the magnet plating comprising an electrically-conductive material, as taught by Schultz, in order to increase physical strength, corrosion resistance… Regarding claim 3, the combination of Gao et al. and Schultz disclose when the cable plating is magnetically fixed to the magnet assembly via magnetic attraction between the cable plating and the permanent magnet, and wherein the metal shield layer is galvanically coupled to the ground via electrical contact between the cable plating and the magnet plating. Regarding claims 4-5 and 8, it would have been obvious to modify Gao et al. to have the cable plating comprises a nickel gold plating and the cable plating and the magnet plating each comprises a nickel gold plating, and the permanent magnet comprises an AlNiCo material, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416 for better engaging. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao et al. in view of Lybrand (12,620,733). Regarding claim 11, Gao et al., Fig. 2 shows the ground is a printed circuit board (PCB) ground, except for the magnet assembly is coupled to the PCB ground via a soldered connection. Lybrand, Fig. 2 shows solder tails (130). It would have been obvious to modify Gao et al. to have the solder tails, as taught by Lybrand for better connection. 6. The magnetic grounding system of claim 1, wherein the cable assembly comprises a flexible flat cable (FFC) or a flexible printed circuit (FPC) cable. Claims 12 and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (9,755,334) in view of Gao et al. (8,888,500) and Schultz (2015/0000952). Regarding claim 12, Li et al. disclose an electronic device, comprising: a printed circuit board (102, Fig. 1B) comprising a PCB ground (105); a cable assembly (103) comprising (i) a metal shield layer enclosing one or more conductors, and (ii) a cable plating (104) galvanically contacting the metal shield layer. Li et al. disclose the claimed invention as described above except for a magnet assembly comprising a permanent magnet, the cable plating comprises magnetic material. Gao et al. disclose a magnet assembly comprising a permanent magnet (120, Fig. 1), the cable (107, Fig. 5) with the cable plating (410) comprises magnetic material (column 4, lines 40-42). It would have been obvious to modify Li et al. to have a magnet assembly comprising a permanent magnet, the cable plating comprises magnetic material, as taught by Gao et al. for better connection. Regarding claim 16, Li et al., Fig. 2A shows the cable assembly comprises a flexible printed circuit. Regarding claim 17, it is noted that Gao et al., Fig. 5 shows the cable assembly further comprises an insulation layer (507) bonded to the metal shield layer (540), a portion of the insulation layer is removed to expose a portion of the metal shield layer, and the cable plating galvanically contacts the exposed portion of the metal shield layer. Regarding claims 15 and 18, it would have been obvious to modify Li et al. and Gao et al. to have the cable plating comprises a nickel gold plating and the permanent magnet comprises an AlNiCo material, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416 for better engaging. Regarding claim 19, it is noted that Gao et al., Fig. 5 shows the metal shield layer completely encloses the one or more conductors of the cable assembly. Regarding claim 20, it is noted that Gao et al., Fig. 9 shows the one or more conductors of the cable assembly are coupled to a set of respective connection pins (220), and wherein when the cable plating is magnetically fixed to the magnet assembly, the set of respective connection pins of the cable assembly are aligned with corresponding conductors of a mated connector. Claims 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. and Gao et al. and further in view of Schultz (2015/0000952). Regarding claim 13, Li et al. and Gao et al. disclose the claimed invention as described above except for the magnet assembly further comprises a magnet plating that is plated onto the permanent magnet, the magnet plating comprising an electrically-conductive material. Schultz, Fig. 3 shows a magnetic (310) plated with nickel and gold. It would have been obvious to provide Li et al. and Gao et al. to have a magnet plating that is plated onto the permanent magnet, the magnet plating comprising an electrically-conductive material, as taught by Schultz for better connection. Regarding claim 14, the combination of Li et al., Gao et al. and Schultz disclose when the cable plating is magnetically fixed to the magnet assembly via magnetic attraction between the cable plating and the permanent magnet, and wherein the metal shield layer is galvanically coupled to the PCB ground via electrical contact between the cable plating and the magnet plating. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANH TAM T LE whose telephone number is (571)272-2094. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdul Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THANH TAM T LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831 10/08/26 thanh-tam.le@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 11, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12756146
INTERCHANGEABLE PLUG FOR A POWER ADAPTER AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING AND USING THE SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756138
MAGNETIC CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12725980
GROUNDING DEVICE FOR A VEHICLE AND VEHICLE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722669
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM FOR GROUPS OF ELECTRICAL LOADS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719197
CONNECTOR WITH HOOKING PORTIONS
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.8%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1443 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month