Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/454,883

CAR PROVIDED WITH AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE AND WITH A DUAL-CLUTCH TRANSMISSION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 24, 2023
Examiner
DANG, TINH
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ferrari S.p.A.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
454 granted / 534 resolved
+33.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
552
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§102
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§112
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 534 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED CORRESPONDENCE This is in response to the papers filed on 08/24/2023 for Application No. 18/454,883. Claims 1-13 are pending. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) received on 08/24/2023 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 7, the phrase "for example or i.e." renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claims 8-9 are rejected upon dependent from a rejected claim and they inherit its deficiencies. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-6 and 10-13 are allowed. Claims 7-9 are rejected but would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the prior art of record fails to disclose or render obvious a car having two front wheels, two rear drive wheels, a passenger compartment which is arranged between the front wheels and the rear wheels, an internal combustion engine, which is provided with a plurality of cylinders, within which respective pistons slide, and with a drive shaft connected to the pistons and in combination with remaining features recited, particularly “a containing body (73) which contains the transmission (7) therein, has a tapered shape towards the rear so that the height of the containing body (73) progressively reduces from the front to the rear, and has a bottom wall (74) at the bottom, which is inclined relative to the horizontal; and a rear aerodynamic diffuser (75), which is inclined relative to the horizontal and is arranged under the containing body (73);wherein the bottom wall (74) of the containing body (73) has the same inclination relative to the horizontal of the aerodynamic diffuser (75)”. Regarding claim 7, the prior art of record fails to disclose or render obvious the car according to claim 7 and includes the combination of features recited. The closest prior art of reference is Mizuno et al. (US 6,435,298 B1). Mizuno discloses a vehicle 14 includes two axles 3,4 with front and rear wheels, a front internal combustion engine (col. 7, line 15-22), a center shaft (15) disposed at the bottom center of the vehicle, a differential gear 6, a rear undercover main body 19 with opening 33 and a plurality of flow-adjusting fins 37,38, which is inclined relative to the horizontal and is arranged under the body of differential 6 and configured to provide cooling for the differential 8 and drive elements of the vehicle (col. 4, lines 11-16; col. 5, lines 13-21; col. 5, line 58 – col. 7, line 22). See Figures 1-12. However, Mizuno does not disclose the particular features required by claim 1. There is no motivation for a skilled person in the art to modify the vehicle of Mizuno to achieve the claim invention as recited. Claims 2-6 and 8-13 are allowable because they depend from an allowable base claim. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Moradnia et al. (US 2022/0219768 A1) discloses a diffuser for a vehicle, see Figures 2-12; Wolf et al. (US 10,676,140 B2) discloses a rear diffusor unit with a flow-directing sealing element, see Figures 1-10; Shinedling et al. (US 2017/0297637 A1) discloses a configurable rear underbody aerodynamic diffuser, see Figures 1-6; Froling et al. (US 8,882,176 B2) discloses an active aero diffuser, see Figures 1-4; and Onodera et al. (US 8,668,254 B2) disclose a vehicle underfloor structure, see Figures 1-6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tinh T Dang whose telephone number is (571)270-1776. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9AM - 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ernesto Suarez can be reached at Mon-Friday from 8AM-4:30PM at (571) 270-5565. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TINH T DANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655 February 20, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 24, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590627
DIFFERENTIAL ASSEMBLY AND ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY FOR FRICTION DISK CLUTCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589648
DRIVE DEVICE FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE, IN PARTICULAR FOR A CAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12535131
WHEEL-HUB GEARS AND CASINGS THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12534080
MOTOR VEHICLE WITH HILL DESCENT CONTROL FUNCTION WHICH CAN BE ENABLED BY A DEDICATED COMMAND AND ENABLEMENT PROCESS OF THE HILL DESCENT CONTROL FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12528349
Axle Gear System for a Motor Vehicle Drive Axle
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+7.7%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 534 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month