Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/454,883

CAR PROVIDED WITH AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE AND WITH A DUAL-CLUTCH TRANSMISSION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 24, 2023
Priority
Aug 25, 2022 — IT 102022000017619
Examiner
DANG, TINH
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ferrari S.p.A.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
456 granted / 537 resolved
+32.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
555
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
43.1%
+3.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 537 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED CORRESPONDENCE This is in response to the papers filed on 08/24/2023 for Application No. 18/454,883. Claims 1-13 are pending. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) received on 08/24/2023 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 7, the phrase "for example or i.e." renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claims 8-9 are rejected upon dependent from a rejected claim and they inherit its deficiencies. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-6 and 10-13 are allowed. Claims 7-9 are rejected but would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the prior art of record fails to disclose or render obvious a car having two front wheels, two rear drive wheels, a passenger compartment which is arranged between the front wheels and the rear wheels, an internal combustion engine, which is provided with a plurality of cylinders, within which respective pistons slide, and with a drive shaft connected to the pistons and in combination with remaining features recited, particularly “a containing body (73) which contains the transmission (7) therein, has a tapered shape towards the rear so that the height of the containing body (73) progressively reduces from the front to the rear, and has a bottom wall (74) at the bottom, which is inclined relative to the horizontal; and a rear aerodynamic diffuser (75), which is inclined relative to the horizontal and is arranged under the containing body (73);wherein the bottom wall (74) of the containing body (73) has the same inclination relative to the horizontal of the aerodynamic diffuser (75)”. Regarding claim 7, the prior art of record fails to disclose or render obvious the car according to claim 7 and includes the combination of features recited. The closest prior art of reference is Mizuno et al. (US 6,435,298 B1). Mizuno discloses a vehicle 14 includes two axles 3,4 with front and rear wheels, a front internal combustion engine (col. 7, line 15-22), a center shaft (15) disposed at the bottom center of the vehicle, a differential gear 6, a rear undercover main body 19 with opening 33 and a plurality of flow-adjusting fins 37,38, which is inclined relative to the horizontal and is arranged under the body of differential 6 and configured to provide cooling for the differential 8 and drive elements of the vehicle (col. 4, lines 11-16; col. 5, lines 13-21; col. 5, line 58 – col. 7, line 22). See Figures 1-12. However, Mizuno does not disclose the particular features required by claim 1. There is no motivation for a skilled person in the art to modify the vehicle of Mizuno to achieve the claim invention as recited. Claims 2-6 and 8-13 are allowable because they depend from an allowable base claim. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Moradnia et al. (US 2022/0219768 A1) discloses a diffuser for a vehicle, see Figures 2-12; Wolf et al. (US 10,676,140 B2) discloses a rear diffusor unit with a flow-directing sealing element, see Figures 1-10; Shinedling et al. (US 2017/0297637 A1) discloses a configurable rear underbody aerodynamic diffuser, see Figures 1-6; Froling et al. (US 8,882,176 B2) discloses an active aero diffuser, see Figures 1-4; and Onodera et al. (US 8,668,254 B2) disclose a vehicle underfloor structure, see Figures 1-6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tinh T Dang whose telephone number is (571)270-1776. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9AM - 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ernesto Suarez can be reached at Mon-Friday from 8AM-4:30PM at (571) 270-5565. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TINH T DANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655 February 20, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 24, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630211
STEER-BY-WIRE STEERING SYSTEM HAVING AN OFF-AXIS STEERING SYSTEM SUPPORT COLUMN PROVIDED WITH A STEERING WHEEL ROTATION LIMITING DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631250
PLANETARY GEARBOX WITH A THRUST WASHER HAVING ANTI-ROTATION MEANS
2y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623753
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CHANGING A BICYCLE TRANSMISSION RATIO OF A BICYCLE TRANSMISSION
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617264
CAR PROVIDED WITH AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE ARRANGED WITH THE DRIVE SHAFT UP
2y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611926
ELECTRIC DRIVE AXLE IN A VEHICLE
1y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+7.9%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 537 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month