Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/456,031

SEMICONDUCTOR SWITCH

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 25, 2023
Examiner
CLARK, CHRISTOPHER JAY
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Toshiba Electronic Devices & Storage Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
560 granted / 742 resolved
+7.5% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
760
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 742 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3-9 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 recites the limitation "the second light emitting element" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purpose of examination the aforementioned limitation will be interpreted as --a second light emitting element--. Claims 4-9 and 13 are rejected due to their dependence on claim 3. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 10, and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Feil et al (2022/0239291). In re Claim 1, Feil teaches a semiconductor switch as seen in the Figure comprising: a switching transistor (M1) connected between a pair of output terminals (14 and 15, directly to 14 and to 15 via R5 and M2); a transmission element (L1 and L2) to which an input signal is input (paragraphs 73 and 75); a receiving element (I) configured to generate a first current based on input of the input signal to the transmission element (paragraph 73), wherein the receiving element is isolated from the transmission element (paragraph 73); and a power supply circuit (U1) configured to supply a power supply current to a control electrode of the switching transistor in response to generation of the first current (paragraphs 78-81). In re Claim 2, Feil teaches the transmission element is a first light emitting element configured to emit light based on input of the input signal (paragraphs 73 and 75), the receiving element has at least a first photovoltaic element configured to generate a photovoltage when receiving light (paragraph 73), the switch further includes a second photovoltaic element (D3) configured to generate a photovoltage when receiving light (paragraph 75), and the power supply circuit outputs the power supply current that has reached a predetermined current in accordance with a current supplied from the second photovoltaic element (paragraphs 89-92, and 102). In re Claim 10, Feil teaches that the power supply circuit U1 delivers a power supply current to the switching transistor M1 supplied from constant voltage source C1 (paragraph 85). In re Claim 12, Feil teaches the receiving element I is configured to generate the first current via optical coupling with the transmission element L1 (paragraph 73). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-9 and 13 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 11 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. In re Claim 3, Feil teaches a second light emitting element (L2), but fails to teach that the second light emitting element is turned on earlier than the first light emitting element L1. Claims 4-9 and 13 are allowable due to their dependence on claim 3. In re Claim 11, Feil teaches a second MOSFET M2, but fails to teach that the first and second MOSFET are connected in series and are charged by the power supply current supplied from the constant voltage source in addition to a current generated by the receiving element, and are made conductive. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER JAY CLARK whose telephone number is (571)270-1427. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 10:00am - 6:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thienvu Tran can be reached at 571-270-1276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER J CLARK/Examiner, Art Unit 2838 /THIENVU V TRAN/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 25, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 04, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603494
REDUCING TRANSFORMER INRUSH CURRENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597540
OVERVOLTAGE PROTECTION DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SUCH A DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597765
Circuit Breaker Unit
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592558
ELECTRICAL PANELBOARD WITH INTEGRATED ARC FAULT PROTECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587011
SUBSTRATE PARASITE REDUCTION TECHNIQUE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+23.0%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 742 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month