Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/456,107

ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 25, 2023
Examiner
KUIPERS, JENNA ANN
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Fujifilm Business Innovation Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
18 granted / 24 resolved
+10.0% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
65
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
57.5%
+17.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 24 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. JP2023-043908, filed on 3/20/2023. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 8-13, and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sekiguchi (US PGP 2014-0255840) in view of Ishii (JP 2004-333968) and further in view of Kinoshita (US PGP 2012-0115078). Sekiguchi teaches a toner comprising a binder resin wherein the storage modulus of the toner at 90°C is less than 1.0x105 and the storage modulus at 180°C is greater than 1.0x103 (Figure 1, [0023], Abstract). The toner includes an external additive ([0204]). Sekiguchi further teaches that the toner comprises a crystalline polyester resin ([0048]]) in an amount from 1 to 15 parts by weight ([0100]). In addition to the crystalline polyester resin the toner further comprises a non-crystalline polyester resin ([0141]). The toner has a loss tangent of 1.0 to 2.5 ([0067]). Figures 1 and 2 demonstrate that the loss tangent is within this range at both 90°C and 150°C. Additionally, Sekiguchi teaches that the THF soluble component of the toner has a number average molecular weight of 1,000 to 10,000 ([0018]). Sekiguchi teaches an image forming apparatus comprising a toner cartridge and a process cartridge that read on claims 10-13 and 17-19 and which are capable of performing the image forming method recited in claim 20 ([0210-231]). While Sekiguchi teaches the above loss tangent properties of the toner, Sekiguchi is silent regarding the strain applied during the measurement of the properties. Additionally, the toner is taught to be paired with magnetic carrier particles, but is silent regarding a true specific gravity of the particles. Ishii teaches a toner comprising a binder resin with specific viscoelastic properties (Abstract). Ishii teaches that the storage modulus and loss tangent with regard to strain is a result effective variable that may be used to optimize high-temperature offset resistance ([0030-32]). Regarding the relationship between the storage modulus and strain, Figure 16 shows that the difference in storage modulus at strain levels of approximately 1% to 10% is relatively unchanged and that a slight decrease in storage modulus is encountered at a strain level of 50%. Such a relationship would be expected to give ratios of loss tangent values at strain values of 1% and 50% at different temperatures within the ranges taught in pending claim 1. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the toner of Sekiguchi to have optimized the relationship between loss tangent values at different strain values in the toner as taught by Ishii in order to optimize high-temperature offset resistance. Kinoshita teaches a magnetic carrier comprising composite core particles comprising ferromagnetic iron oxide particles and a cured phenol resin, a melamine resin coating layer on the core particles (Abstract). This carrier is capable of maintaining a suitable electric resistance value upon development, exhibiting good durability, obtaining a good reproducibility of uniform solid images having a high image density, and keeping high-quality images having an excellent gradation for a ling period of time ([0001]). The carrier further comprises a resin coating layer on the outer surface of the melamine resin layer ([0029]). The true specific gravity of the toner is preferably 3.0 to 4.0 g/cm3 ([0052]). A true specific gravity in this range tends to reduce the energy upon impingement between the toner and the carrier, thereby avoiding the occurrence of spent toner ([0014]). The content of the ferromagnetic iron oxide fine particles in the carrier is preferably 80 to 99% by weight in order to produce a particle that is not too coarse, while maintaining sufficient strength of the particle ([0056]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have used the carrier of Kinoshita with the modified toner of Sekiguchi and Ishii in order to obtain the above benefits. Furthermore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date to have optimized the loss tangent at 90°C and the true specific gravity in order to perfect the result effective variables associated with each. Claims 5-7 and 14-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sekiguchi, Ishii, and Kinoshita as applied to claims 1-4, 8-13, and 17-20 above, and further in view of Tomohiro (JP 2017-044864). The entire discussion of Sekiguchi, Ishii, and Kinoshita above in included herein. Sekiguchi does not teach the inclusion of crosslinked resin particles in the toner particles. Tomohiro teaches a toner that contains specific resin particles ([0029]). The specific resin particle dispersion 6 contains styrene and n-butyl acrylate along with a crosslinking agent ([0133]) to produce crosslinked styrene-acrylic resin particles. (Meth)acrylics are preferable for their affinity with polyester resins and their electrical properties ([0034]). These specific resin particles impart the benefits of a decrease in likelihood of the external additive easily separating from the toner particle, causing contamination of the carrier and changing the image density, and good low temperature fixability ([0030]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the toner of Sekiguchi and Ishii to have included the specific resin particles of Tomohiro in order to gain the benefits of the resin particles as listed above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jenna Kuipers whose telephone number is (571)272-0161. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 - 5:30 PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.K./Examiner, Art Unit 1734 /PETER L VAJDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 02/24/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 25, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12585208
GLITTERING TONER, TONER-STORING UNIT, DEVELOPER, DEVELOPER-STORING UNIT,IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578666
TONER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING TONER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12535749
ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPING TONER, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12535750
TONER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12529971
PROCESS CARTRIDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.3%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 24 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month