Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/456,186

TRANSFORMER

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Aug 25, 2023
Priority
Dec 30, 2022 — CN 202211726510.8
Examiner
NGUYEN, TUYEN T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Delta Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1031 granted / 1263 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1310
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
56.5%
+16.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1263 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species 4, Figure 4, Claims 1-6 and 8-12 with claim 1 is generic in the reply filed on 6/25/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that searching these Species together should be no undue burden on the Examiner. This is not found persuasive because search other Species require additional search in other areas, class/subclass. Claims 1-6 and 8-12 will be examined herewith. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6 and 8-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the term “substantially” is a relative term. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yoji et al. [JP 2003-163123A]. Regarding claims 1 and 3, Yoji et al. discloses a transformer [figures 5a-5b], comprising: - a first magnetic core, comprising a first base and a first pillar, wherein the first pillar is disposed at a center of the first base; - a second magnetic core, comprising a second base and two second pillars, wherein the second pillars are respectively formed on opposite ends of the second base, the second pillars extend toward the first base, the first pillar extends toward the second base and is disposed between the second pillars, and a length of the first pillar is substantially the same as a length of each of the second pillars [figures 1c and 5b]; a first winding assembly [23a], surrounding the first pillar and disposed between the first pillar and the second pillars; and a second winding assembly [21a], surrounding the first pillar and disposed between the first pillar and the second pillars, wherein the first winding assembly and the second winding assembly are separated from each other, wherein the first winding assembly is disposed between the second winding assembly and the first base, and the second winding assembly is disposed between the first winding assembly and the second base [figure 5b]. Regarding claim 2, Yoji et al. discloses an air gap is formed between the first base and the second pillars [figure 5b], an additional air gap is formed between the second base and the first pillar [figure 5b], and the air gap and the additional air gap are disposed on opposite ends of the first pillar [figure 5b]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6 and 8-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Watanabe et al. [US 5,359,313] in view of Yoji et al. Regarding claims 1 and 3, Watanabe et al. discloses a transformer [figures 1-5] comprising: - a second core [60] having center pillar [63], two side pillars [62] and a first base [61], wherein a length of the first pillar is substantially the same as a length of each of the second pillars [figure 4]; - a second core [70] having a second base; - a first coil [30] wound around the center pillar and disposed between the center pillar and the two side pillars; and - a second coil [50] wound around the center pillar and disposed between the center pillar and the two side pillars, wherein the first coil and the second coil are separated from each other, wherein the first winding assembly is disposed between the second winding assembly and the first base, and the second winding assembly is disposed between the first winding assembly and the second base [figures 1 and 4]. Watanabe et al. disclose the instant claimed invention except for the specific of the pillars relative to the first and second cores. Yoji et al. discloses a transformer [figure 5] comprising: - a first core [14] having a first pillar [11] disposed at a center of a base of the first core [figure 5b]; - a second core [15] having two second pillars formed on opposite ends of a base of the second base [figure 5b]; and - at least one coil [21a, 23a] surrounding the first pillar, wherein a length of the first pillar is substantially the same as a length of each of the second pillars [figures 5 and 1]. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to use the center pillar and two side pillar arrangement of the first and second cores of Yoji et al. in Watanabe et al. for the purpose of facilitating manufacturing and/or assembling. Regarding claim 2, Yoji et al. discloses an air gap is formed between the first base and the second pillars [figure 5b], an additional air gap is formed between the second base and the first pillar [figure 5b], and the air gap and the additional air gap are disposed on opposite ends of the first pillar [figure 5b]. Regarding claims 4-5, Watanabe et al. discloses the transformer further comprises a winding base [10]disposed on the first base, and the first winding assembly and the second winding assembly are disposed between the winding base and the second base, wherein the winding base comprises a plurality of pins [21, 22, 23], and the first winding assembly or the second winding assembly winds around the pins. Regarding claims 6 and 8, Watanabe et al. discloses the transformer further comprises a spacing member [11] formed of insulative material, disposed between the first winding assembly and the second winding assembly, wherein the first coil [30] is disposed between the spacing member [11] and the first base, and the second winding assembly is disposed between the spacing member and the second base [figures 1 and 4]. Regarding claim 9, Watanabe et al. discloses the insulative material made of plastic. Regarding claim 10, Watanabe et al. discloses the transformer further comprises a winding base [10], and the winding base comprises: a tubular portion [12], surrounding the first or center pillar, wherein the first winding assembly surrounds the tubular portion; and a planar portion [11] connected to the tubular portion and disposed between the first winding assembly and the second winding assembly. Claim(s) 11-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Watanabe et al. in view of Yoji et al. as applied to claims 1 and 10 above, and further in view of Kyoso et al. [US 6,522,233 B1]. Regarding claim 11, Watanabe et al. in view of Yoji et al. disclose the instant claimed invention except for the winding base. Kyoso et al. discloses a magnetic device [figures 3-4B] comprising: - a core having legs [4a, 4b, 5a, 5b]; - first and second coils [1, 2a/2b] arranged around one of the core leg [figures 3-4A]; and - a winding base [3] including a tubular portion, wherein the first and second coils arranged around the tubular portion [figure 4A], and a planar portion [3b] connected to the tubular portion and disposed between the first and second coils [figure 4A]. Kyoso et al. further discloses a spacing member [7b] arranged between the planar portion and the second coil [figure 4A]. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to use the winding base [bobbin] and spacing arrangement of Kyoso et al. in Watanabe et al. for the purpose of improving insulating and/or spacing between the coils. Regarding claim 12, both Watanabe et al. and Kyoso et al. discloses the spacing member material formed of insulative material. Resin or plastic is a known insulative material use for forming spacing in magnetic device. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to use resin or plastic for the spacing member for the purpose of facilitating insulation. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUYEN T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1996. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached at 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUYEN T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 25, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749613
INDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744149
WOUND CORE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738404
MULTILAYER COIL COMPONENT
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731723
INTEGRATED BOTTOM SUNKEN SURFACE MOUNT AND/OR SWING INDUCTOR AND FABRICATION METHODS
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725726
INDUCTOR
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+1.2%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1263 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month