Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/456,637

PAVER WORK MACHINE WITH A THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 28, 2023
Examiner
ADDIE, RAYMOND W
Art Unit
3671
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Deere & Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1283 granted / 1576 resolved
+29.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1610
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
74.5%
+34.5% vs TC avg
§102
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1576 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-5, 9, 13, 14, 16-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Brock US 5,899,630. Brock discloses a paver work machine (10) comprising: A hopper see Fig. 1; a screed (12) and a heat exchange system (14) comprising a thermal energy circuit (16-36) configured to heat the screed. The heat exchange system (16-34) comprising: 1st and 2nd heat exchangers (24, 26), a feed line (28), a return line (30), a pump (32), a heater (34), a heat transfer medium such as oil and suitable reservoir and a feedback control system including a temperature sensor configured to detect the temperature of the screed plate (21) or the heat transfer medium in the feed line (28). What Brock does not do is identify each part of the heat exchange system with the nomenclature claimed. However, Fig. 1 clearly illustrates each component of the heat exchange system and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to recognize the heat exchange system claimed and the heat exchange system disclosed by Brock are art recognized equivalents. Col. 2, ln. 61-Col. 4, ln. 58. With respect to claims 2, 3, 5 Brock illustrates the heat transfer medium circulates in one direction and discloses the system could be open or closed looped. With respect to claims 4, 9 Brock discloses the pump (32) and heating medium to heat the top of the screed plate (12). Col. 3, ln. 32-55. With respect to claims 13, 16-18 discloses a method of operating a heat exchange system comprising a heat pump (32) configured to heat a screed plate during paving operations. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention the screed heating method of Brock includes the steps claimed. Col. 4, ln. 41-58. Claim(s) 6, 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Brock US 5,899,630 in view of Stallgies et al. US 2015/0337505. Brock discloses a paver work machine (10) comprising: A hopper, see Fig. 1; a screed (12) and a heat exchange system (14) comprising a thermal energy circuit (16-36) configured to heat the screed. The heat exchange system (16-34) comprising: 1st and 2nd heat exchangers (24, 26), a feed line (28), a return line (30), a pump (32), a heater (34), a heat transfer medium such as oil and suitable reservoir and a feedback control system including a temperature sensor configured to detect the temperature of the screed plate (21) or the heat transfer medium in the feed line (28). Wherein heat is transferred between the condenser and the screed within a defined ambient temperature range. What Brock does not do is disclose an electric pump (32). However, Stallgies et al. teaches it is known to provide paving machine (1) with electro-hydraulic systems, including fluid reservoirs and a hydraulic pump which is driven electrically by an electric motor and to which an actuator is connected to a hydraulic circuit. [0009]. A control device (17) including an operator input for activating the pump, electric motor of the pump to energize the hydraulic circuit. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the paving machine of Brock with the electric pump and control unit taught by Stallgies et al. in order to improve pump performance, monitoring and adjusting. Claim(s) 10, 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Brock US 5,899,630 in view of Utterodt et al. US 2011/0318102. Brock discloses a paver work machine (10) comprising: A hopper, see Fig. 1; a screed (12) and a heat exchange system (14) comprising a thermal energy circuit (16-36) configured to heat the screed. The heat exchange system (16-34) comprising: 1st and 2nd heat exchangers (24, 26), a feed line (28), a return line (30), a pump (32), a heater (34), a heat transfer medium such as oil and suitable reservoir and a feedback control system including a temperature sensor configured to detect the temperature of the screed plate (21) or the heat transfer medium in the feed line (28). Wherein heat is transferred between the condenser and the screed within a defined ambient temperature range. What Brock does not do is heat the hopper. However, Utterodt et al. teach it is known to heat paving machine hoppers (124) having longitudinal conveyors (24). Wherein a heating element (not shown) is disposed within the hopper (22) adjacent the longitudinal conveyor. Temperature sensors (146) are positioned on opposite sides of the hopper, at different heights, in order to monitor the asphalt temperature in the hopper. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the paving machine of Brock with a heated hopper and control unit taught by Utterodt et al. in order to prevent clumping of the asphalt in the hopper. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7, 11, 12, 15, 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND W ADDIE whose telephone number is (571)272-6986. The examiner can normally be reached on m-f 7:30-12:30, then 6-9pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris Sebesta can be reached on 571-272-0547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you need help from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAYMOND W ADDIE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3671 3/2/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 28, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637617
SOIL STABILIZING COMPOSITIONS
4y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637815
SMART ROAD MARKING CONSTRUCTION METHOD, SMART ROAD MARKINGS AND AUTONOMOUS DRIVING SYSTEM USING THE SAME
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635115
Electrical Work Machine Having a Cooled Battery
3y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624516
MODULAR NETWORK ACCESS FRAME AND COVER
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618204
ASPHALT PAVING DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+8.2%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1576 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month