Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/458,230

CONTAINER FOR STORING A BODILY FLUID

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Aug 30, 2023
Priority
Feb 01, 2019 — DE 10 2019 102 597.4 +2 more
Examiner
SIEFKE, SAMUEL P
Art Unit
1758
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Dc Diagnostics Concept Ug (Haftungsbeschrankt)
OA Round
2 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
667 granted / 1058 resolved
-2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1096
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§102
38.1%
-1.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1058 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 and 4 of prior U.S. Patent No. 11,779,930. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 3 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of Ho does not teach a container (1) for storing a bodily fluid comprising: an interior space (4) configured to store the bodily fluid; and a wall (5) enveloping the interior space, wherein a surface of the wall (5) facing the interior space (4) of the container (1) forms a contact surface (6),wherein at least a portion of the contact surface (6) is provided with a coating including a polypeptide-based block copolypeptides prepared by recombinant DNA technology, composed of electrically neutral and protein repellent or electrically charged elastin polypeptide constructs. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMUEL P SIEFKE whose telephone number is (571)272-1262. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Maris Kessel can be reached at 571-270-7698. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMUEL P SIEFKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1758
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 30, 2023
Application Filed
May 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Aug 05, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765813
METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN ANALYTE CONCENTRATION IN A FLUID
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12758968
UNIT DEVICE, METHOD, AND ASSEMBLY
5y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761182
BIOSENSOR CARTRIDGES AND BIOSENSOR SYSTEM HAVING THE SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12754173
MONITORING ANALYSIS DEVICE AND MONITORING ANALYSIS METHOD
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12742736
CHROMATOGRAPHIC STRIP SUPPORT TOOL AND METHOD FOR USING SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+17.8%)
3y 4m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1058 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month