Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/458,417

INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §101§102§112
Filed
Aug 30, 2023
Priority
Mar 20, 2023 — JP 2023-044720
Examiner
WILLIAMS, ARUN C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1159 granted / 1412 resolved
+22.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1435
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
30.4%
-9.6% vs TC avg
§112
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1412 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102 §112
DETAILED ACTION This is a first action on the merits, in response to the claims received 8/30/2023. Claims 1-24 are pending for prosecution below. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) file on 8/30/2023 has been considered by the examiner. An initialed copy is attached herewith. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-20,22-24 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is not supported by either a specific and substantial asserted utility or a well-established utility. Claims lacks any recitation of structure, let alone a recitation which creates a substantial tie so as to impose meaningful limitations on the claim scope because is merely a set of instructions. There is nothing of record which clearly indicates that the method recited is not directed to an abstract idea. Claims 1-20,22-24 also rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph. Specifically, because the claimed invention is not supported by either a specific and substantial asserted utility or a well-established utility for the reasons set forth above, one skilled in the art clearly would not know how to use the claimed invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6,21-24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mannepalli, (USNO.2022/0305942) As for claim 1, Mannepalli discloses and shows in Fig. 1 an information processing apparatus, comprising: a processing circuitry (ref’s server) configured to acquire information of a first connection time period during which a mobile object is connected to a charge connector among a first period (via trial period), the charge connector configured to become capable of control of charge and discharge and measurement of a remaining charge amount of a storage battery (ref’s SOC) included in the mobile object when the mobile object is connected to the charge connector, and information on a remaining charge amount of the storage battery measured during the first connection time period (via trial period), and estimate a second connection time period (via ref’s scheduled period) during which the mobile object is connected to the charge connector among the second period and a remaining charge amount of the storage battery during the second connection time period, based on the information of the first connection time period and the information on the remaining charge amount of the storage battery (via users provided or uploaded vehicle charging information) (par.[0046-0050,0053,0078]). As for claim 2, Mannepalli discloses and shows in Fig. 1 the processing circuitry is configured to estimate the second connection time period and a remaining charge amount of the storage battery based on information on a first non-connection time period during which the mobile object is not connected (via built in memory) to the charge connector. As for claim 3, Mannepalli discloses and shows in Fig. 1 the processing circuitry is configured to estimate a second non-connection time period during which the mobile object is not connected to the charge connector in the second period. As for claim 4, Mannepalli discloses and shows in Fig. 1 the information on the battery remaining charge amount includes the battery remaining charge amount and a measurement time of day of the battery remaining charge amount, and the processing circuitry is configured to estimate the battery remaining charge amount in the second connection time period for each time of day (par.[0047]) As for claim 5, Mannepalli discloses and shows in Fig. 1 the second period is a period that is temporally posterior to the first period. As for claim 6, Mannepalli discloses and shows in Fig. 1 a battery remaining charge amount measurer configured to acquire, by measuring the battery remaining charge amount of the mobile object connected to the charge connector during the first period, information on the battery remaining charge amount and information on the first non-connection time period As for claim 21, Mannepalli discloses and shows in Fig. 1a charge/discharge controller configured to control charge and discharge of the storage battery of the mobile object connected to the charge connector As for claim 22, Mannepalli discloses and shows in Fig. 1 an information processing method, comprising: acquiring information (via ref’s server) of a first connection time period during (ref’s trial period) which acquiring information of a first connection time period during which a mobile object is connected to a charge connector among a first period, the charge connector configured to become capable of control of charge and discharge and measurement of a remaining charge amount of a storage (ref’s SOC) battery included in the mobile object when the mobile object is connected to the charge connector, and information on a remaining charge amount of the storage battery measured during the first connection time period; and estimating a second connection time period (via ref’s scheduled period) during which the mobile object is connected to the charge connector among the second period and a remaining charge amount of the storage battery during the second connection time period, based on the information of the first connection time period and the information on the remaining charge amount of the storage battery (via users provided or uploaded vehicle charging information) (par.[0046-0050,0053,0078]). As for claim 23, Mannepalli discloses and shows in Fig. 1 a non-transitory computer readable medium storing a computer program stored therein which causes a computer to perform processes comprising: acquiring information (via ref’s server) of a first connection time period (ref’s trial period) during which a mobile object is connected to a charge connector among a first period, the charge connector configured to become capable of control of charge and discharge and measurement of a remaining charge amount of a storage battery included in the mobile object when the mobile object is connected to the charge connector, and information on a remaining charge amount of the storage battery measured during the first connection time period; and estimating a second connection time period (via ref’s scheduled period) during which the mobile object is connected to the charge connector among the second period and a remaining charge amount of the storage battery during the second connection time period, based on the information of the first connection time period and the information on the remaining charge amount of the storage battery (via users provided or uploaded vehicle charging information) (par.[0046-0050,0053,0078]). As for claim 24, Mannepalli discloses and shows in Fig. 1 an information processing method, comprising: a mobile object having a storage battery, in response to being the a mobile object connected to a charge connector, which becomes capable of control of charge and discharge and measurement of a remaining charge amount of the storage battery (ref’s SOC) included in the mobile object; and a processing circuitry (via ref’s server) configured to acquire information of a first connection time period (ref’s trial period) during which the mobile object is connected to a charge connector among a first period, and information on a remaining charge amount of the storage battery measured during the first connection time period; and estimate a second connection time period (via ref’s scheduled period) during which the mobile object is connected to the charge connector among the second period and a remaining charge amount of the storage battery during the second connection time period, based on the information of the first estimate a second connection time period, based on the information of the first connection time period and the information on the remaining charge amount of the storage battery (via users provided or uploaded vehicle charging information) (par.[0046-0050,0053,0078]). Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARUN C WILLIAMS whose telephone number is (571)272-9765. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9 a.m. - 6 p.m.. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julian Huffman can be reached on 571-272-2147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ARUN C WILLIAMS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 30, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700626
INDUCTIVE HEATING OF BATTERIES FOR CHARGING
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12654888
Base Stations For Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12642309
E-Cigarette Rechargeable Battery Charging Case
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12646963
CHARGER FOR A VAPORIZER DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12640589
CIRCUIT OF WIRELESS CHARGING AND METHOD OF CHARGING BATTERY
3y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+16.3%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1412 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month