Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/459,787

ELECTRONIC PARKING BRAKE APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102§Other
Filed
Sep 01, 2023
Examiner
HSIAO, JAMES K
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
597 granted / 780 resolved
+24.5% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
821
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
§102
41.5%
+1.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 780 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Park (US-20220185255). Regarding claim 1, Park discloses an electronic parking brake apparatus for a vehicle (fig 1), comprising: a drum (12); a backing plate disposed within the drum (fig 1, [0031]); a cylinder (13) attached to a surface of the backing plate (fig 1, [0031]); a motor (M) configured to expand or contract the cylinder ([0031-0032]); a pair of brake shoes (11ab) respectively coupled to first and second sides of the cylinder fig 1); a lining attached to an outer circumferential surface of each brake shoe ([0030]); a spring (18) coupled between the pair of brake shoes; and a control unit (20) configured to control a contraction operation of the cylinder when a parking brake of the vehicle is released (fig 2), wherein the control unit is configured to determine, based on a temperature of the electric motor (at least [0081] wherein the target motor current directly correlates to the drum temperature and [0083] wherein compensation for a release time of the electric drum brake 10 according to a temperature of the electric drum brake 10, wherein the motor is part of the drum brake 10 and therefore thermally coupled inside the brake drum) or a hydraulic pressure of a master cylinder of the vehicle an end time of the contraction operation of the cylinder in order to control contraction of the cylinder (at least [0009]), and wherein the control unit is configured to delay the end time of the contraction operation when the temperature of the motor is lower than a predetermined temperature or the hydraulic pressure of the master cylinder is higher than a predetermined pressure (at least [0081] wherein the target motor current directly correlates to the drum temperature and wherein when the motor current reaches the target current, the controller 20 determines the parking release time which is a period of time while the motor current maintains the target current, based on the temperature of the drum 12. The controller 20 may estimate the temperature of the drum 12 from wheel speed information and braking pressure information, or directly detect the temperature of the drum 12 through a temperature sensor, and [0083] wherein compensation for a release time of the electric drum brake 10 according to a temperature of the electric drum brake 10, wherein the motor is part of the drum brake 10). Regarding claim 2, Park discloses wherein the control unit is configured to determine the end time further based on at least one of a temperature of the drum ([0056-0057] including an alternative method wherein the temperature of the drum can be directly detected using a temperature sensor). Regarding claim 3, Park discloses wherein the control unit is configured to, in response to the temperature of the drum being higher than a predetermined temperature, delay the end time for contracting the cylinder ([0011], wherein the controller is configured to determine the parking release time when the temperature of the drum is high to be longer than the parking release time when the temperature of the drum is low). Regarding claim 6, Park discloses wherein the control unit is capable of determining the end time of the contraction operation based on a temperature of the lining ([0057 at least wherein a mathematical model for calculating the temperature of the drum 12 may be created using the above conversion process of thermal energy. The frictional energy generated from the frictional force is converted into the thermal energy and absorbed by the drum 12. The thermal energy generated by the frictional force may be expressed as a function of a friction coefficient of the brake linings, braking pressure, wheel speed, and the like). Regarding claim 7, Park discloses wherein the control unit is configured to determine the end time of the contraction operation based on an ambient temperature ([0057 at least wherein a mathematical model for calculating the temperature of the drum 12 may be created using the above conversion process of thermal energy including an atmospheric temperature. The frictional energy generated from the frictional force is converted into the thermal energy and absorbed by the drum 12. The thermal energy generated by the frictional force may be expressed as a function of a friction coefficient of the brake linings, braking pressure, wheel speed, and the like). Regarding claim 8, Park discloses wherein the control unit (20) is configured to control a rotation speed of the motor to adjust a contraction distance of the cylinder (figs 2, 4 and 5). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 9 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 1/30/2006 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding claim 1, Applicant argues that the prior art of record lacks wherein the control unit is configured to determine, based on a temperature of the motor or a hydraulic pressure of a master cylinder of the vehicle, an end time of the contraction operation of the cylinder in order to control contraction of the cylinder, and wherein the control unit is configured to delay the end time of the contraction operation when the temperature of the motor is lower than a predetermined temperature or the hydraulic pressure of the master cylinder is higher than a predetermined pressure, because Park discloses compensation for a release time of the electric drum brake according to a temperature of the drum and not the motor, Examiner respectfully disagrees. As set forth above, it has been interpreted electric motor current directly correlates to the temperature of the drum at least in that the target current in based on drum temperature. Park also discloses in at least [0083] wherein the electric drum brake system and the control method thereof can prevent drag of a vehicle by compensating for a release time of the electric drum brake 10 according to a temperature of the electric drum brake 10. It has been interpreted that the motor 13 is within and thermally coupled to the drum 12 (fig 1) and therefore in a shared thermal environment wherein it would be reasonable to expect that the temperature of the drum is effectively representative of the electric motor temperature. Park also discloses an alternative method of detecting temperature using a temperature sensor located within the drum, it has also been interpreted that at least by proximity and thermal coupling, a temperature sensor detecting temperature within the drum would also be effectively representative of the electric motor temperature. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES K HSIAO whose telephone number is (571)272-6259. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at 571-272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.K.H/Examiner, Art Unit 3616 /Robert A. Siconolfi/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3616
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 01, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §Other
Jan 30, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595834
SEALING DEVICE AND DAMPER FOR HYDRAULIC EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576680
SYNTHETIC ELASTOMERIC AIR SPRING WITHOUT REINFORCING FIBERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12545093
Hydro-Mount
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12537125
SOLENOID, DAMPING FORCE ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM, AND DAMPING FORCE ADJUSTABLE SHOCK ABSORBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12529408
VIBRATION DAMPER HAVING TWO ADJUSTABLE DAMPING VALVE DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+15.3%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 780 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month